War in Ukraine

[IluvdoubleD's]

 

[tnmarktx]

Enter mysterious Ukraine sniper who will take out Russians on the level of Fedir Dyachenko.

Maybe it's the ghost of Kyiv 2.0.

 

[IluvdoubleD's]

 

[IluvdoubleD's]

Enter mysterious Ukraine sniper who will take out Russians on the level of Fedir Dyachenko.

He's already in Ukraine, and coincidentally the world record holder for the longest sniper kill of approx. 2 miles in Iraq.

 

[Rasputin_Vol]

Beijing Tells Chinese Business-People To Fill Void In Russian Market Amid Ukraine Crisis | ZeroHedge

Ambassador Zhang Hanhui urged Chinese businessmen in Moscow to make good use of the current Russia–Ukraine war as he met with representatives earlier this week. According to a March 21 social media post by the Russian Confucius Culture Promotion Association, the ambassador told business heads to waste no time and “fill the void” in the Russian economy.

 

[allvol123]

Those Chinese are going to be very disappointed in the quantity of Russian ideas and inventions worthy of stealing.

 

[tvolsfan]

Those Chinese are going to be very disappointed in the quantity of Russian ideas and inventions worthy of stealing.

And the Russians are going to be disappointed by their alternative business partners.

 

[Rasputin_Vol]

And the Russians are going to be disappointed by their alternative business partners.

We shall see...

 

[Rasputin_Vol]

They made the mistake of giving out unbiased reporting. That is why they were banned/blocked in the first place.

After 12 hours of campaign and 25K posts in support, tech giant YouTube unblocks WION

 

[luthervol]

They made the mistake of giving out unbiased reporting. That is why they were banned/blocked in the first place.

After 12 hours of campaign and 25K posts in support, tech giant YouTube unblocks WION

Seems to me YouTube followed their guidelines by blocking them. They were banned because they provided video of the Russian foreign minister saying "We did not attack Ukraine either. We explained on numerous occasions that there was a situation that posed a direct threat to the security of the Russian Federation."

YouTube's guidelines: "Our community guidelines prohibit content denying, minimizing, or trivialising well-documented violent events, including the Russian invasion of Ukraine, adding,"Under this policy, we have removed content, for example, denying that Russia invaded Ukraine or alleging that Ukrainian victims are crisis actors."

 

[Rasputin_Vol]

Seems to me YouTube followed their guidelines by blocking them. They were banned because they provided video of the Russian foreign minister saying "We did not attack Ukraine either. We explained on numerous occasions that there was a situation that posed a direct threat to the security of the Russian Federation."

YouTube's guidelines: "Our community guidelines prohibit content denying, minimizing, or trivialising well-documented violent events, including the Russian invasion of Ukraine, adding,"Under this policy, we have removed content, for example, denying that Russia invaded Ukraine or alleging that Ukrainian victims are crisis actors."

Yeah, their community guidelines. I don't care about rules, guidelines or laws if those rules, guidelines and laws are unjust.

 

[luthervol]

Yeah, their community guidelines. I don't care about rules, guidelines or laws if those rules, guidelines and laws are unjust.

I think it is 100% justifiable for a company to refuse to provide a platform for known propaganda if they wish.

 

[volgr]

I think it is 100% justifiable for a company to refuse to provide a platform for known propaganda if they wish.

Whose to say what is propaganda and what isnt? Also, everyone know these guidelines arent enforced equally. You can go on YouTube and talk about all sorts of pro Ukrainian propaganda, hell YouTube will likely propogate it themselves and bump it into your feed as recommended.

 

[IluvdoubleD's]

 

[Hunerwadel]

I think it is 100% justifiable for a company to refuse to provide a platform for known propaganda if they wish.

I think it's 100% justifiable for a private company to refuse to provide a platform to anyone they choose for any reason they choose.

 

[IluvdoubleD's]

 

[Paper_Towel]

 

[Paper_Towel]

 

[BreatheUT]

Those Chinese are going to be very disappointed in the quantity of Russian ideas and inventions worthy of stealing.

True, but that's what were for.

 

[BreatheUT]

We shall see...

Right. Like Russia and China aren't clear eyed about what each of them are.

 

[volgr]

I think it's 100% justifiable for a private company to refuse to provide a platform to anyone they choose for any reason they choose.

People can always go to MySpace if they don't like Facebook. By the way, how is MySpace doing these days?

 

[BreatheUT]

I think it is 100% justifiable for a company to refuse to provide a platform for known propaganda if they wish.

Weren't you saying in the last couple years the US was ready for their Bolshevik Revolution?

 

[lawgator1]

Seems to me YouTube followed their guidelines by blocking them. They were banned because they provided video of the Russian foreign minister saying "We did not attack Ukraine either. We explained on numerous occasions that there was a situation that posed a direct threat to the security of the Russian Federation."

YouTube's guidelines: "Our community guidelines prohibit content denying, minimizing, or trivialising well-documented violent events, including the Russian invasion of Ukraine, adding,"Under this policy, we have removed content, for example, denying that Russia invaded Ukraine or alleging that Ukrainian victims are crisis actors."

Was that Tucker's channel on youtube?

 

[BreatheUT]

Was that Tucker's channel on youtube?

Lol...you want to report him? That's right dammit. Take matters in your own hands.

 

[davethevol]

It was nice knowing you all. No way this doesn’t escalate things to the point of no return.
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/03/26/bid...ng-speech-on-russian-invasion-of-ukraine.html