Kyle Rittenhouse - The Truth in 11 Minutes

I was not speaking to their innocence or guilt. Again, I think this kid is going to get a not guilty on the most serious charges. However, I listened to him questioned regarding his desire to be a hero. I watched him fake cry. I think he’s innocent, but also full of sh1t. And I’ve been doing this awhile. I think he acted in self defense, but he put himself in a bad situation. This kid isn’t dumb and he will have to shoulder his decisions.
If you think he acted in self defense then what is all of this nonsense you keep spewing? I think most people agree he put himself in a bad situation. Literally no one that I know is arguing that.
 
Last edited:
Judge Bruce Schroeder is too aware of the cameras, and it looks like he is auditioning to replace "Judge Judy" when she retires. He is really hamming it up.
 
Joseph Rosenbaum & Anthony Huber Criminal Records Explored
I'm surprised leftist media hasn't labeled them 'The Kenosha Choirboy Killings"

Joseph Rosenbaum criminal record:
Newly released documents obtained by Wisconsin Right Now from the Pima County (Arizona) Clerk of Courts confirm Rosenbaum was charged by a grand jury with 11 counts of child molestation and inappropriate sexual activity with children, including anal rape. The victims were five boys ranging in age from nine to 11 years old. He was convicted of two amended counts as part of a plea deal. See those documents here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Gaige Grosskreutz Criminal record:
He confirmed in court that he has one criminal conviction. It’s for this:

gaige.png


Online records show he’s affiliated with The People’s Revolution, the Milwaukee-area protest group that has been protesting at Mayfair Mall and elsewhere. The man accused of attacking and shooting at Wauwatosa Police Officer Joseph Mensah was also affiliated with that group. Grosskreutz was charged with second-offense drunk driving after the shootings, but the case was dismissed on a prosecution motion right before the Rittenhouse trial.

He was also accused of prowling by West Allis police. The police report accuses him of “lurking” in an area where police keep their private vehicles, videotaping them. We have a call into municipal court to obtain the disposition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jonathan Huber criminal record:
Huber had a disorderly conduct conviction from 2018 as a domestic abuse repeater, which is a misdemeanor. He gave a Kenosha address. Here are the charges in that case.
940.19(1) Battery Misd. A Dismissed on Prosecutor’s Motion
Modifier: 939.62(1)(a) Repeater
Modifier: 968.075(1)(a) Domestic Abuse

2 947.01(1) Disorderly Conduct Misd. B Guilty Due to Guilty Plea
Modifier: 968.075(1)(a) Domestic Abuse
Modifier: 939.62(1)(a) Repeater

He also had a forfeiture case for possessing drug paraphernalia.
He also had a case from 2012 with these charges:

1 941.30(2) 2nd-Degree Recklessly Endangering Safety Felony G Charge Dismissed but Read In
Modifier: 939.63(1)(c) Use of a Dangerous Weapon
Modifier: 968.075(1)(a) Domestic Abuse

2 940.235(1) Strangulation and Suffocation Felony H Guilty Due to Guilty Plea
Modifier: 968.075(1)(a) Domestic Abuse

3 940.30 False Imprisonment Felony H Guilty Due to Guilty Plea
Modifier: 968.075(1)(a) Domestic Abuse
Modifier: 939.63(1)(b) Use of a Dangerous Weapon

4 940.19(1) Battery Misd. A Charge Dismissed but Read In
Modifier: 968.075(1)(a) Domestic Abuse
Modifier: 939.63(1)(a) Use of a Dangerous Weapon

5 947.01(1) Disorderly Conduct Misd. B Charge Dismissed but Read In
Modifier: 968.075(1)(a) Domestic Abuse
Modifier: 939.63(1)(a) Use of a Dangerous Weapon

6 947.01(1) Disorderly Conduct Misd. B Charge Dismissed but Read In
Modifier: 968.075(1)(a) Domestic Abuse
Typical BLM protestors
 
It's pretty pathetic that this is the case that would cause anybody to think think our judicial system is becoming draconian. As far as injustices go, this is a nothing burger. He shot people and we had a trial to see if he was justified. Big fkn deal. God, do you guys even know what happens every day in the CJS? Innocent people go to prison all the time. We make criminals out of thin air by limiting basic freedoms. But bc Rittenhouse shot people and had to face a trial, we have a banana republic all of a sudden. You can't make this **** up.

Lol, you have the president weighing on this "nothing burger" get a clue dude
 
Lol, you have the president weighing on this "nothing burger" get a clue dude

What in the hell does that have to do with the point? Do you feel validated because sleepy Joe spoke on this? Doesn't make this trial the birth of a dictatorship or whatever nonsense I was refuting.
 
So media outlets have said they were black?

They heavily insinuated it. Also, I've had quite a few of my left-leaning friends tell me they were surprised by the details of this case after watching some of the trial. I'm still wondering why they had an opinion on a case in which they didn't watch the video for themselves, but ya know people still accept fake news as truth.
 
They heavily insinuated it. Also, I've had quite a few of my left-leaning friends tell me they were surprised by the details of this case after watching some of the trial. I'm still wondering why they had an opinion on a case in which they didn't watch the video for themselves, but ya know people still accept fake news as truth.

How do they do that? Does anybody have a clip?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BowlBrother85
Gaige Grosskreutz gives 1st interview since testifying in Rittenhouse trial

Clown world: a hall of fame defensive end interviewing an Antifa member who directly contradicts his own testimony from a few hours earlier without any pushback or further probing from the interviewer.

How are we supposed to take these people seriously? It is painfully obvious that they are trying to craft a narrative to manipulate the public opinion. They don't even try to hide it.
 
Clown world: a hall of fame defensive end interviewing an Antifa member who directly contradicts his own testimony from a few hours earlier without any pushback or further probing from the interviewer.

How are we supposed to take these people seriously? It is painfully obvious that they are trying to craft a narrative to manipulate the public opinion. They don't even try to hide it.

I watched that yesterday and it was clearly edited, not live. The only reason ABC would do that is to maintain the message.
 
So media outlets have said they were black?
They heavily insinuated it.
I have seen some coverage of the trial which suggested that Kyle Rittenhouse might be a racist, because he supposedly fraternized in a bar with members of a white supremacist group known as the "Proud Boys", while also flashing white power signs.

I have seen some coverage of the trial which mentioned that Jacob Blake is black, and the police officer who shot him, Rusten Sheskey, is white, but I haven't seen anyone definitively say, or even subtly suggest, that the people who Kyle Rittenhouse shot were black.

I think your sensitivities are heightened over this case, because you sympathize with the defendant.
 
I have seen some coverage of the trial which suggested that Kyle Rittenhouse might be a racist, because he supposedly fraternized in a bar with members of a white supremacist group known as the "Proud Boys", while also flashing white power signs.

I have seen some coverage of the trial which mentioned that Jacob Blake is black, and the police officer who shot him, Rusten Sheskey, is white, but I haven't seen anyone definitively say, or even subtly suggest, that the people who Kyle Rittenhouse shot were black.

I think your sensitivities are heightened over this case, because you sympathize with the defendant.

Maybe so, I do sympathize with someone acting in blatant self-defense being charged with murder. I would have the same thoughts if Kyle was black, but we all know he wouldn't be on trial if that was the case.
 
I have seen some coverage of the trial which suggested that Kyle Rittenhouse might be a racist, because he supposedly fraternized in a bar with members of a white supremacist group known as the "Proud Boys", while also flashing white power signs.

I have seen some coverage of the trial which mentioned that Jacob Blake is black, and the police officer who shot him, Rusten Sheskey, is white, but I haven't seen anyone definitively say, or even subtly suggest, that the people that he shot were black.

I think your sensitivities are heightened over this case, because you sympathize with the defendant.
I think your point here works the other way in proving his point as well. That some of those more liberal in their political leanings believed this was some young, crazed, white nationalist who went on a shooting spree at a peaceful protest. Mainly due to their heightened sensitivities because they sympathize with the people protesting/rioting in this case. But also because the media has gone out of it's way to be generous toward it's coverage of protestors, even these acting violently.
 
Maybe so, I do sympathize with someone acting in blatant self-defense being charged with murder. I would have the same thoughts if Kyle was black, but we all know he wouldn't be on trial if that was the case.
Because he would've been killed by the police during the arrest?
 
Could there be a chance the feds try him if he is acquitted in this trial? I mean Joe already proclaimed him a white supremacist
 
  • Like
Reactions: CagleMtnVol
I have seen some coverage of the trial which suggested that Kyle Rittenhouse might be a racist, because he supposedly fraternized in a bar with members of a white supremacist group known as the "Proud Boys", while also flashing white power signs.

I have seen some coverage of the trial which mentioned that Jacob Blake is black, and the police officer who shot him, Rusten Sheskey, is white, but I haven't seen anyone definitively say, or even subtly suggest, that the people who Kyle Rittenhouse shot were black.

I think your sensitivities are heightened over this case, because you sympathize with the defendant.

I think people hear "BLM protesters" and probably assume they are black but I'm thinking Candace Owens is misleading with her "brainwash" accusation moreso than the MSM has (in this specific case). I'll change my mind if somebody can substantiate her claim.
 
I think people hear "BLM protesters" and assume they are black but I'm thinking Candace Owens is misleading with her "brainwash" accusation moreso than MSN has (in this specific case). I'll change my mind if somebody can substantiate her claim.
I won't speak for her but I think the issue here is people are lazy and tend to listen to people who view the world through a similar lens they do and seek sources that confirm their prejudices. They discount everything else, the need to be right is stronger now than it ever has been it seems.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top