rocytop2624
The 411 Guy.
- Joined
- May 1, 2011
- Messages
- 21,307
- Likes
- 26,248
Ah yea. I remember seeing other posts about that. I can’t speak to that, i haven’t heard that happening. But, if your doctors think you are safe to get it, that’s all that would matter to me. But I’m just a random Internet guy. Hope it works out for you. And your sonI was joking about Ron. She got really sick and can't smell our taste.
Taters are good. Cool kewl ku Kool noogaAh yea. I remember seeing other posts about that. I can’t speak to that, i haven’t heard that happening. But, if your doctors think you are safe to get it, that’s all that would matter to me. But I’m just a random Internet guy. Hope it works out for you. And your son
I never contradicted myself nor asked (or cared) what your beliefs are. If your religion preaches anti-vax, then I'm fine with using a religious exemption. If your religion doesn't preach it, you get flu vaccines, your kids get vaccinated, then I think claiming a religious exemption is BS. The majority fall into the latter.
Regarding the religious reasons, most of those claiming that are full of it. Approximately 1% of schoolage kids do not get vaccinations due to religious reasons. It is estimated that 15-20% of the workforce would claim religious reasons in the event of a forced vaccination.
I believe most people are trying to use "religion" as a strawman defense as a reason not to get vaccinated.
Most who are using this excuse aren't using it because they are mis-informed or actually have those beliefs, its because they think its the way to keep from having a forced vaccination.
I have no issue if a core doctrine of your religion is anti-vaccination. If that's your belief, then that's your belief. I have an issue if you are lying. Problem is, its not too easy to tell who has these beliefs and who is making it up.
A guy I work with that is doing it is for real he home schools and is real religious type.Pretty consistent that I said legitimate religious beliefs are OK and lying is not OK. Given 20% of employees at mandated companies are expected to claim religious exemptions now and 1% previously claimed them (based on vaccinations for their kids), then there's a lot of lying to be expected...
Pretty consistent that I said legitimate religious beliefs are OK and lying is not OK. Given 20% of employees at mandated companies are expected to claim religious exemptions now and 1% previously claimed them (based on vaccinations for their kids), then there's a lot of lying to be expected...
I can’t control those people and I am not willing to use the type of force against my fellow Tennesseans that it would take to make them all take the precautions that you reference. From my perspective, someone who expects everyone else to bend to her will so she can feel safe is the one who thinks the world revolves around her.If I looked out my window and saw four dozen automatic rifles pointed my way, I’d move. Seeing people wandering around without masks doesn’t rise to that level.
I don’t believe that unvaccinated/unmasked people are likely to kill me, because I take basic precautions (vaccinated, masked, wary about enclosed places with lots of people.) I DO believe that they are likely to seriously sicken and perhaps kill other people. Kids under 12. Immunocompromised. Old people. And young random folks who thought they would only get a bad cold.
That bothers me. It doesn’t bother you? It’s only about you? I real am mystified.
You said Most are using it as an excuse then said it's hard to tell who's lying. Which is it?
My religious beliefs are non of your business.
So "historically" 1% has possibly lied but you don't know, you just think it's probable.It's both. Historically 1% has claimed a religious exemption for vaccinations. Now, its expected to be 20% for the COVID vaccine (and still 1-2% for school vaccinations). With 100 people, 1 person has a legitimate excuse and 19 are making it up.
And yes, the hard part is figuring out of the 20 people is telling the truth.
This is a super slippery slope and I do not know the right answer.
Yes, since the logical fallacies card was being played pretty heavily in this thread a la "strawman" and "slippery slope," I was wondering when we could talk about "hasty generalization," "invalid analogy," or "false premise."So "historically" 1% has possibly lied but you don't know, you just think it's probable.
Now it's "expected" that the probable liars will jump up to 20%.
That was my whole point, which I was trolling more than anything, but generalizations, especially about religious beliefs interests me. And you kept saying "your" which I assumed was another generalization but you used it so many times I wasn't sure.
