Recruiting Forum Football Talk III

Status
Not open for further replies.
He should get another year. He will get another year if these violations aren’t tied to him.
I’ve now read all of your posts - interesting that you claim connection with Phil (call him Phillip). I have great respect for Coach Fulmer but completely disagree he thoroughly vetted Pruitt before hiring him. If he had, Freeze would seem like an “angelic“ hire right now compared to what Pruitt was back in 2017. Because of the situation Coach Fulmer was thrown into and his football prowess, I gave the Pruitt hire a chance. What has happened now verifies that he was a bad hire in 2017 and continues to be a bad head coach now and I don’t just mean X’s and O’s. It seems that we/UT may be headed for some sanctions and if that is the case, I would give Coach Freeze and UT Football a chance to rehab their respective reputations together - under a very watchful eye.
 
I’ve now read all of your posts - interesting that you claim connection with Phil (call him Phillip). I have great respect for Coach Fulmer but completely disagree he thoroughly vetted Pruitt before hiring him. If he had, Freeze would seem like an “angelic“ hire right now compared to what Pruitt was back in 2017. Because of the situation Coach Fulmer was thrown into and his football prowess, I gave the Pruitt hire a chance. What has happened now verifies that he was a bad hire in 2017 and continues to be a bad head coach now and I don’t just mean X’s and O’s. It seems that we/UT may be headed for some sanctions and if that is the case, I would give Coach Freeze and UT Football a chance to rehab their respective reputations together - under a very watchful eye.
I’d kill to have Freeze. Would be a slam dunk hire in my mind. Just don’t think it’s going to happen.
 
Protect and defend the university. That's the primary goal.
If they tried to screw him just to save money, then they all deserve to go down with him. I am a Vol, but that slimy backstabbing **** sickens me.

We should have just fired the man for doing a bad job...that was enough of a reason and the right thing to do.
 
Reading this, I'm curious if Bama gave him full control when he was first hired or if he's accrued his power over time with his multiple NC's?

He made stout demands when he was hired and his power has grown with his reputation and record. But he came to Bama with the creds, he was their top choice, he was open to the opportunity and they were in make-it-happen mode.
 
I’ve now read all of your posts - interesting that you claim connection with Phil (call him Phillip). I have great respect for Coach Fulmer but completely disagree he thoroughly vetted Pruitt before hiring him. If he had, Freeze would seem like an “angelic“ hire right now compared to what Pruitt was back in 2017. Because of the situation Coach Fulmer was thrown into and his football prowess, I gave the Pruitt hire a chance. What has happened now verifies that he was a bad hire in 2017 and continues to be a bad head coach now and I don’t just mean X’s and O’s. It seems that we/UT may be headed for some sanctions and if that is the case, I would give Coach Freeze and UT Football a chance to rehab their respective reputations together - under a very watchful eye.
This would make way to much sense for us to do something this smart.
 
If we had a coach that won us 5, possibly soon to be 6, NCs, I'd be all for giving him whatever control he asked for.

And yes, I know he has 6 NCs, but the first one was at LSU. I'm talking about a coach winning that many at one school. If we had a coach like that, I'd say give him whatever he asked for.
 
Referred to McGill as preacher man. Has clearly been around a while since I don't think McGill's ministry involvement has been discussed for quite some time.

So...yes...information is suspect. As much because he's trolling, as when he started doing so.

And on that note, if y'all would do the civilized thing and ignore these people rather than bludgeoning them until they create new accounts, life would be so much simpler.

Ignore..is bliss.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SSVol and bullet20
He made stout demands when he was hired and his power has grown with his reputation and record. But he came to Bama with the creds, he was their top choice, he was open to the opportunity and they were in make-it-happen mode.
They were desperate. They got lucky Rich rod turned then down lol

It's what aTm is hoping will happen with Jimbo... He and saban had similar credentials when they were both hired.

Meyer and stoops are the only two guys that you could justify doing the same for.
 
He made stout demands when he was hired and his power has grown with his reputation and record. But he came to Bama with the creds, he was their top choice, he was open to the opportunity and they were in make-it-happen mode.
So why would Napier think he’s earned this? I’m assuming that from earlier posts about his demands. Saban had won a title at LSU. Track record of winning at a high level. Napier hasn’t proven anything. Sure he has won... in the Sun Belt.

Coaches egos are on another level and I work with doctors 😂
 
It’s going to be Phillip’s call what we do going forward. If major violations are found that are directly tied to Pruitt, he’ll be let go. If not, he’ll be back next season, as he should be.
They both need to be fired. If Pruitt is brought back then UT Football is officially dead
 
  • Like
Reactions: bullet20
I figure Friday. He still has to be interviewed. Maybe just be a formality. We can't stall. Fire for cause. He'll sue. Drag it out like Kansas v. Beaty.
He’s already been interviewed per people I’ve talked to (and insiders on this board.)

My guess he will have another meeting this week in which they present their findings to him.
 
Memphis Mitch’s post sure sounds like he heard specifics. It’s always the same. “You guys won’t believe what I’ve heard that I can’t tell you about yet!”
I think we’ve all heard certain things, but there’s no way to verify the rumors. Mainly because these “allegations” border on schoolhouse gossip - just the nature of the beast with impermissible benefits.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement



Back
Top