Amateur Hour Continues

#34,101
#34,101
evillawyer said:
Click to expand...

I would guess most politicians would struggle with a Constitution basics test like my 3rd grader aced last month.

Of course some of the ideas I shared with him may not make him very popular with a liberal teacher but thankfully his seemed to be in the same page
 
#34,104
#34,104
What happened to the wig?

Emu9s8AVoAAr5YM
 
#34,109
#34,109
Orangeslice13 said:
I think the process does have to play out for him to be legitimate. I think it will play out. And nobody will be able to complain when it’s over. It’s how things should be handled. Just like in Bush Vs Gore. The system has a job to do and it will get done eventually
Click to expand...
Big difference in what’s going on now versus the Bush/Gore situation. But you know this.
 
#34,117
#34,117
utvolpj said:
I would guess most politicians would struggle with a Constitution basics test like my 3rd grader aced last month.

Of course some of the ideas I shared with him may not make him very popular with a liberal teacher but thankfully his seemed to be in the same page
Click to expand...
Quite a few posters on here would struggle with a test on the Constitution, and several claim to be lawyers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MG1968, Orangeslice13 and FLVOL_79
#34,120
#34,120
RockyTop85 said:
I still don’t think the plan is to get the courts to do anything. That’s been one institution that has generally continued to function well.
Click to expand...
It's not surprising that there's no coherent legal strategy when we've had four years of "tweet first, and figure out the legal details later."
 
#34,121
#34,121
Velo Vol said:
It's not surprising that there's no coherent legal strategy when we've had four years of "tweet first, and figure out the legal details later."
Click to expand...
I think the strategy is based around the people who will accept any statement that offers confirmation of what they want as a true statement, even if it’s false. (See e.g. the voter fraud thread and the election thread).

Rile them up, create a loyalty test, and see if the state legislatures will cave to the pressure of a primary challenge in which they aren’t the Trumpiest. Exactly the same model he’s used for the senate since 2018.

FWIW (not much at this point, IMO)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: tvolsfan
#34,122
#34,122
RockyTop85 said:
I think the strategy is based around the people who will accept any statement that offers confirmation of what they want as a true statement, even if it’s false. (See e.g. the voter fraud thread and the election thread).

Rile them up, create a loyalty test, and see if the state legislatures will cave to the pressure of a primary challenge in which they aren’t the Trumpiest. Exactly the same model he’s used for the senate since 2018.

FWIW (not much at this point, IMO)
Click to expand...

They should take a stand if no fraud is found.
EC should vote the will of the people.
 
#34,123
#34,123
RockyTop85 said:
I think the strategy is based around the people who will accept any statement that offers confirmation of what they want as a true statement, even if it’s false. (See e.g. the voter fraud thread and the election thread).

Rile them up, create a loyalty test, and see if the state legislatures will cave to the pressure of a primary challenge in which they aren’t the Trumpiest. Exactly the same model he’s used for the senate since 2018.

FWIW (not much at this point, IMO)
Click to expand...

Hopefully they stand by that when the bold happens.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top