The Hunter Biden Thread

#1,977
#1,977
BowlBrother85 said:
Are you saying that its Trump's job to enforce Ukrainian law? Trump solicited the President of the Ukraine for an investigation into Joe Biden. Not the other way around.
Click to expand...
It's Trump's job to apply foreign policy, which means that it's his job not to invest our tax dollars into corrupt countries and systems.


That was the excuse Biden used for his quid pro quo.
 
#1,978
#1,978
Orangeburst said:
200.gif
Click to expand...
Barr better call Wray in his office and tell him they will never get his foot out of Wray’s ass it will be up there so far if Wray stalls even 5 minutes
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#1,979
#1,979
Orange_Crush said:
The FBI's jurisdiction is Ukrainian crimes and corruption? What does the FBI, DoJ or any US-based federal law enforcement agency have to do with Ukrainian crime? You're claiming that Trump needs to work through the FBI to affect foreign policy?

Trump "had no business"...? That sounds like feelz and opinions, when you've been appealing to law and constitution. Can we get back to those claims?

Also... I can't help but notice that the list of your answers is shrinking as the list of my questions grows. I'll help, and multi-quote all these clarifications that I've asked for, and you don't seem to be answering.
Click to expand...
I've made my point clear. Trump should have allowed any investigating which was justified into Joe Biden, to be conducted by the U.S. Department of Justice. That includes his appointed Attorney General and his appointed FBI Director. As it played out, Trump was guilty of a very clear conflict of interest in soliciting an investigation into a potential opponent of his in his next election, and he also violated Joe Biden's Constitutional right to equal protection under the law. That has nothing to do with foreign policy. It has to do with abiding by the U.S. Constitution and protecting the rights of an American citizen.
 
#1,982
#1,982
Orange_Crush said:
It's Trump's job to apply foreign policy, which means that it's his job not to invest our tax dollars into corrupt countries and systems.


That was the excuse Biden used for his quid pro quo.
Click to expand...
This didn't concern foreign policy. It concerned the rights of an American citizen and a very obvious conflict of interest on Trump's part.
 
#1,984
#1,984
BowlBrother85 said:
This didn't concern foreign policy. It concerned the rights of an American citizen and a very obvious conflict of interest on Trump's part.
Click to expand...

Imagine only caring about 'rights' when they can be thrown around meaninglessly for a member of The Teamâ„¢.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hog88
#1,985
#1,985
NorthDallas40 said:
Barr better call Wray in his office and tell him they will never get his foot out of Wray’s ass it will be up there so far if Wray stalls even 5 minutes
Click to expand...

I am still awaiting Barr's investigation of Epstein's death. Rather pizzes me to be honest as he said there would be an investigation and would let the people know
 
#1,986
#1,986
BowlBrother85 said:
This didn't have to concern foreign policy. Trump made it that way by withholding aid to the Ukraine. It was very improper.
Click to expand...
😂 going from memory it was Punxsutawney Joe that made that threat unless a prosecutor was fired which he was. However the Trump admin delivered the aid with no investigation womp womp 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: tennvols77
#1,990
#1,990
Wireless1 said:
Originally I thought the same but since there isn't any refuting from the left and the press, makes me think they'll get him across the finish line then jettison him like spoiled meat.
I'm wondering who really is behind this.
Click to expand...
That’s what I’m guessing too. By December Harris will be president
 
#1,991
#1,991
BowlBrother85 said:
I've made my point clear. Trump should have allowed any investigating which was justified into Joe Biden, to be conducted by the U.S. Department of Justice. That includes his appointed Attorney General and his appointed FBI Director. As it played out, Trump was guilty of a very clear conflict of interest in soliciting an investigation into a potential opponent of his in his next election, and he also violated Joe Biden's Constitutional right to equal protection under the law. That has nothing to do with foreign policy. It has to do with abiding by the U.S. Constitution and protecting the rights of an American citizen.
Click to expand...
I asked very specific questions that you didn't answer. You just repeated the same questionable claims.

How is Ukrainian crimes and corruption the jurisdiction of US Federal law enforcement? Claiming it is is just...well...making useless bald assertions.

You're back to "should haves" when you had been appealing to law and constitution...accusing infringement on Constitutional rights. Kindly move away from "should haves", and get specific on WHY he should have. The Constitution and law.

Again... That will directly relate to US jurisdiction and whether the US Constitution protects a US Citizen from foreign laws, investigations per foreign crimes.

And the call WAS ABOUT FOREIGN POLICY. Your accusation is about the supposed withholding of foreign aid money and loan guarantees. Guess what? Your accusations are about foreign policy.

So, you've claimed that Trump should have gone through the FBI to implement his foreign policy, and that Trump should have allowed the FBI and US DoJ to investigate Ukrainian crimes and corruption. Further, you've claimed that it was robbing a US citizen of his constitutional rights for a President to suggest that Ukraine investigate Ukrainian crimes and corruption.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tennvols77, AM64 and ButchPlz
#1,994
#1,994
Orange_Crush said:
I asked very specific questions that you didn't answer. You just repeated the same questionable claims.

How is Ukrainian crimes and corruption the jurisdiction of US Federal law enforcement? Claiming it is is just...well...making useless bald assertions.

You're back to "should haves" when you had been appealing to law and constitution...accusing infringement on Constitutional rights. Kindly move away from "should haves", and get specific on WHY he should have. The Constitution and law.

Again... That will directly relate to US jurisdiction and whether the US Constitution protects a US Citizen from foreign laws, investigations per foreign crimes.

And the call WAS ABOUT FOREIGN POLICY. Your accusation is about the supposed withholding of foreign aid money and loan guarantees. Guess what? Your accusations are about foreign policy.

So, you've claimed that Trump should have gone through the FBI to implement his foreign policy, and that Trump should have allowed the FBI and US DoJ to investigate Ukrainian crimes and corruption. Further, you've claimed that it was robbing a US citizen of his constitutional rights for a President to suggest that Ukraine investigate Ukrainian crimes and corruption.
Click to expand...
2ih3nl9ltgs21.png
 
#1,997
#1,997
BowlBrother85 said:
This didn't concern foreign policy. It concerned the rights of an American citizen and a very obvious conflict of interest on Trump's part.
Click to expand...

Whether or not to invest US money as aid to corrupt countries and systems is by-def foreign policy. It's malpractice not to take those things into consideration.

Concerning "...the rights..." of American citizens? What rights? Constitutional, as you've claimed and retreated from? Or the rights of an American citizen per their actions in another country? An American somehow has the right not to be investigated by a foreign country, by that countries laws? Again... Can you reference the international code that specifies that?

Those poor guys that got caned in the Philippines for vandalism should have made that appeal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ButchPlz
#1,998
#1,998
BowlBrother85 said:
He was the most likely opponent of Donald Trump's in the 2020 election. Don't play dumb. You know that Biden led in all of the polls last year.
Click to expand...

Don’t matter, he wasn’t an opponent until he won the nomination. But like I said, trump should have just ordered a drone strike. Couldn’t even impeach him for that.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top