The Hunter Biden Thread

How pathetic of you to skip to the last thing I posted on the subject and leave the rest out. But you can stay in the shallow end if you feel more comfortable there.
What, your made-up ******** that everyone else has kindly taken the time to refute repeatedly or your totally irrelevant rant about "orphaned" kids at the border?

You appear to be only interested in openly promoting pedophilia, rape, destruction, and oppression in the name of your little hurt fee fees because orange man bad. And for some reason you're choosing to do it in a Hunter Biden thread. Gross.
 
The Department of Justice should have handled any investigation of an American citizen which needed to be conducted... and Trump should have steered clear of any such investigation into a potential opponent of his in the next election. But he didn't. It was a conflict of interest on Trump's part, and an infringement of Joe Biden's Constitutional right to equal protection under the law.

The Department of Justice should have investigated corruption in Ukraine?

Joe Biden has a constitutional right not to be investigated by the Ukrainians?

Trump should have steered clear of any investigation that involved a political opponent? That was a conflict of interest that makes him unfit for office? But Biden didn't need to steer clear of any investigation that involved his son? And you're voting for him to be President?

Thanks in advance for your clarification. And thanks for your earlier clarification.

Everything else just concerns whether or not the Bidens were selling political influence. It is not good if they were, but it's also not exactly anything earth shattering when talking about a career politician like Joe Biden.
 
As an American citizen, Joe Biden has the Constitutional right to not have the scales of justice tipped against him by the President of the United States, who stood to gain professionally from the outcome of any such investigation into him. Trump had a very clear conflict of interest and he should not have made himself a part of any investigation into Joe Biden.

At that time Biden was not an opponent so what did Trump have to gain?

But I guess Trump should have just ordered a drone strike on Biden, that's not a violation of the constitution according to Biden.
 
Yeah... pointing to the Constitutional rights of an American citizen to equal protection under the law, and the obvious conflict of interest associated with a President soliciting an investigation into an opponent of his, is really going to the "ends of the earth", isn't it? LOL!
:)
 
The Department of Justice should have investigated corruption in Ukraine?

Joe Biden has a constitutional right not to be investigated by the Ukrainians?

Trump should have steered clear of any investigation that involved a political opponent? That was a conflict of interest that makes him unfit for office? But Biden didn't need to steer clear of any investigation that involved his son? And you're voting for him to be President?

Thanks in advance for your clarification. And thanks for your earlier clarification.
If it involved an American citizen, and needed the cooperation of a foreign government? The FBI Director, Christopher Wray, should have been the one to request that cooperation from the Ukraine and the one to conduct that investigation. Trump had no business soliciting the President of Ukraine for an investigation into Joe Biden. It was a very clear conflict of interest, and completely avoidable.
 
As an American citizen, Joe Biden has the Constitutional right to not have the scales of justice tipped against him by the President of the United States, who stood to gain professionally from the outcome of any such investigation into him. Trump had a very clear conflict of interest and he should not have made himself a part of any investigation into Joe Biden.
Biden has the constitutional right in regards to the Ukrainian justice system?

Trump had a Ukrainian conflict of interest, so he was/is unfit for office?

You're voting for Biden, who blackmailed Ukraine to fire the prosecutor who was investigating the energy company that was paying his son $80,000/mo, and you're voting for him to be president.

Thanks in adnace for your clarification. And for your previous clarification.

Everything else just concerns whether or not the Bidens were selling political influence. It is not good if they were, but it's also not exactly anything earth shattering when talking about a career politician like Joe Biden.
 
Last edited:
At that time Biden was not an opponent so what did Trump have to gain?

But I guess Trump should have just ordered a drone strike on Biden, that's not a violation of the constitution according to Biden.
He was the most likely opponent of Donald Trump's in the 2020 election. Don't play dumb. You know that Biden led in all of the polls last year.
 
Obama droning Americans, lefties pooping all over 1A, 2A, 4A as a matter of policy, Kamala hiding evidence that would release people, and on and on... a-ok.

Trump suggesting a criminal be investigated (investigated, not droned) for allegedly taking bribes and colluding with foreign entities while in office- CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS.

"Without double standards, we'd have no standards at all." - Barack Obama, probably.
 
Biden has the constitutional right in regards to the Ukrainian justice system?

Trump had a Ukrainian conflict of interest, so he was/is unfit for office?

You're voting for Biden, who blackmailed Ukraine to fire the prosecutor who was investigating the energy company that was paying his son $80,000/yr, and you;re voting for him to be president.

Thanks in adnave for your clarification. And for your previous clarification.
Are you saying that its Trump's job to enforce Ukrainian law? Trump solicited the President of the Ukraine for an investigation into Joe Biden. Not the other way around.
 
It took us some time to get furniture that we ordered after finishing our house build this Summer. Custom blinds turned out to be a disaster. Went through Lowe's, and they sent a guy from one contractor to measure, and 2 guys from another to install, after about a 2 month wait.

The measurer was planning on hanging the blinds on the wood around the windows, and the installers hung them above the wood into the sheetrock. Of course, they were too short. This was about $5,000 worth of blinds, and we only did about 12 of the windows, which is about half. We left the back of the house with no window treatments because of the views and nobody can see in from there.

After getting them rehung properly from the original measurer, we now have 52 holes in the sheetrock of a new house, and a $500 estimate to fill holes and spot paint. The estimate goes to $1200 if 7 walls have to be totally repainted to match. So far, Lowe's has not agreed. We have just finished spending many, many thousands of dollars with them on the house build, cabinets, tile, wood flooring, etc. We also spent many thousands with them on the mountain house, but a different Lowe's store.
That sounds nightmarish Grad. I feel your pain. Fortunately our blinds came out fine without too much trouble. They forgot to order one set but made it right. And that was the wife's department anyway. Unfortunately I'm stuck with trying to get our old house up to par. We built it new over 35 years ago. It's in need of an update. Fortunately I can see the light at the end of the tunnel.
 
If it involved an American citizen, and needed the cooperation of a foreign government? The FBI Director, Christopher Wray, should have been the one to request that cooperation from the Ukraine and the one to conduct that investigation. Trump had no business soliciting the President of Ukraine for an investigation into Joe Biden. It was a very clear conflict of interest, and completely avoidable.

The FBI's jurisdiction is Ukrainian crimes and corruption? What does the FBI, DoJ or any US-based federal law enforcement agency have to do with Ukrainian crime? You're claiming that Trump needs to work through the FBI to affect foreign policy?

Trump "had no business"...? That sounds like feelz and opinions, when you've been appealing to law and constitution. Can we get back to those claims?

Also... I can't help but notice that the list of your answers is shrinking as the list of my questions grows. I'll help, and multi-quote all these clarifications that I've asked for, and you don't seem to be answering.
 
The Department of Justice should have investigated corruption in Ukraine?

Joe Biden has a constitutional right not to be investigated by the Ukrainians?

Trump should have steered clear of any investigation that involved a political opponent? That was a conflict of interest that makes him unfit for office? But Biden didn't need to steer clear of any investigation that involved his son? And you're voting for him to be President?

Thanks in advance for your clarification. And thanks for your earlier clarification.
Biden has the constitutional right in regards to the Ukrainian justice system?

Trump had a Ukrainian conflict of interest, so he was/is unfit for office?

You're voting for Biden, who blackmailed Ukraine to fire the prosecutor who was investigating the energy company that was paying his son $80,000/yr, and you;re voting for him to be president.

Thanks in adnave for your clarification. And for your previous clarification.
 
Constitutional right to not be investigated by the Ukrainians?

That's the argument you're trotting out?

Is that why you're OK with Daddy Biden's conflict of interest? You're claiming Hunter had a constitutional right not to be investigated by the Ukrainians?
Bump.
 
Oh God theyre gonna get buried and never see the light of day! 😳


200.gif
 
What, your made-up ******** that everyone else has kindly taken the time to refute repeatedly or your totally irrelevant rant about "orphaned" kids at the border?

You appear to be only interested in openly promoting pedophilia, rape, destruction, and oppression in the name of your little hurt fee fees because orange man bad. And for some reason you're choosing to do it in a Hunter Biden thread. Gross.
🤣
 

VN Store



Back
Top