The Hunter Biden Thread

#726
#726
hUTch2002 said:
Maybe I’m missing something here but where does it say anything about the laptop being Hunter Biden’s? Just having an attorney for Hunter contact the shop doesn’t mean the laptop was his as any attorney would be investigating the source of the story in this case. Maybe I’m missing part of the email.
Click to expand...
I think they talked on the phone and this is an email for contact information. Not 100% sure.
 
#727
#727
Electric Orange said:
I think they talked on the phone and this is an email for contact information. Not 100% sure.
Click to expand...
Gotcha. Yeah, that’ll be dismissed quickly. I was wondering how in the world Rudy could have documentation of the attorney asking for Hunter’s laptop. Maybe there’s a letter out there somewhere. Maybe the shop owner is claiming that’s what the attorney said. I’m not sure. We shall see.
 
#728
#728
davethevol said:
Take it for what it’s worth, but I learned from someone that’s connected to the elite that the FBI is indeed working on a coup against Trump. Without going into much detail, this person hated Trump and was a huge liberal until about a week ago when their high level FBI source gave them a heads up. It’s apparently shaken this persons beliefs to the core. I’ve got some interesting connections that most would never believe and I don’t really expect them to. Just know that the FBI is more corrupt than we could have ever imagined.
Click to expand...
I have imagined it and believed it. We keep focusing on the FBI when the CIA is also neck deep in all of this. Their connections with the parent company of Google should disturb everyone. The CIA Gov contacts should also pertrify people. The CIA has created so much dark money they can do whatever they please. No way to track them and their assets. Not to mention their dark interference with every independent nation that has failed in the last 70 years. We are stuck with agencies with no accountability whatsoever.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and OldVolMan
#730
#730
Septic said:
Remember when the right used to support a private businesses right to make its own decisions?

th
Click to expand...

Remember when private companies actually showed some responsibility and didn't control and suppressed the information we got by showing obvious political bias requiring the federal government to get involved?

Yeah, good times.

We're in a digital age these days and the lack of <cough cough> neutrality showed by Twitter and Facebook is something that obviously needs to be addressed at this point in time. I mean, they brought it on themselves getting Congress involved.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary and AM64
#732
#732
Septic said:
Was a law broken? Are people legally entitled to post whenever and whatever they want?

Apparently the right has decided that a private business decision is in fact subject to congressional oversight.

I thought the right was migrating over to Parler? If people don't like Jack Dorseys policy's, leave. Seems simple enough.
Click to expand...
Big tech petitioned the gov't to label them as platforms instead of publishers, testifying that they did not make editorial decisions. We see now that that was a lie, and it looks like Congress wants to talk to them about that.

And Congress has always had the right to oversee and act against political censorship by the private media, which the Supreme Court upheld, due to the fact that political discourse is so important to the Republic. As a matter of fact, until Clinton there were laws on the books that limited one sided media narratives by limiting ownership of media companies.

Here's what's truly interesting. The left claim Russia interfered with our elections by running a few thousand dollars worth of political ads on social media. The left also cheers the social media platforms themselves interfering with elections in MUCH more sever ways.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, marcusluvsvols and hUTch2002
#733
#733
NurseGoodVol said:
I have imagined it and believed it. We keep focusing on the FBI when the CIA is also neck deep in all of this. Their connections with the parent company of Google should disturb everyone. The CIA Gov contacts should also pertrify people. The CIA has created so much dark money they can do whatever they please. No way to track them and their assets. Not to mention their dark interference with every independent nation that has failed in the last 70 years. We are stuck with agencies with no accountability whatsoever.
Click to expand...
Why should the CIA connections to Google matter? Everyone gives all privacy away with all these smart devices and posting every move they make and every breath they take on social media. It’s amazing how today’s generation has zero thought as to the dangers of these things and the dangers of downloading everything they see.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#735
#735
Orange_Crush said:
Big tech petitioned the gov't to label them as platforms instead of publishers, testifying that they did not make editorial decisions. We see now that that was a lie, and it looks like Congress wants to talk to them about that.

And Congress has always had the right to oversee and act against political censorship by the private media, which the Supreme Court upheld, due to the fact that political discourse is so important to the Republic. As a matter of fact, until Clinton there were laws on the books that limited one sided media narratives by limiting ownership of media companies.

Here's what's truly interesting. The left claim Russia interfered with our elections by running a few thousand dollars worth of political ads on social media. The left also cheers the social media platforms themselves interfering with elections in MUCH more sever ways.
Click to expand...
Exactly. Sure, Twitter, FB, and the lot can decide to remove any posts they like but they lose their legal protections. It’s that simple.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols, Orangeburst, Orange_Crush and 1 other person
#736
#736
Septic said:
I just heard you say that you are cool with American tax dollars being squandered to a employ a wholly unqualified senior WH advisor and that it is somehow less offensive for the tax payer than a dude who is getting paid by a private overseas entity. I assume it's because 'he aInT QuAlifi3d!'

That about right?
Click to expand...
It’s far less than the dollars spent perpetuating the ridiculous Russian hoax, absurd Ukrainian phone call impeachment, and other equally crazy initiatives on behalf of both sides in DC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols, OldVolMan and BigOrangeD
#740
#740
hUTch2002 said:
Exactly. Sure, Twitter, FB, and the lot can decide to remove any posts they like but they lose their legal protections. It’s that simple.
Click to expand...
I think there's also a danger of them being torn apart, and they know it. I suspect the next step will be antitrust litigation--especially when it comes to the subject of free public political discourse.

Have they gotten too powerful when it comes to the dissemination of information for the public to make informed decisions? They're blocking news outlets and .gov websites.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#745
#745
Jxn Vol said:
I can’t believe we are having to ask why the media isn’t ask Joe about this.

This thing could be bigger than Watergate and the media’s reaction is painfully slow.
Click to expand...

Did u see Blitzer interview Pelosi? She was rather outraged to even be challenged by the media and suggested CNN was biased against her.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ajvol01, StarRaider, AM64 and 3 others
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top