Recruiting Forum Football Talk II

Status
Not open for further replies.
#168,453
#168,453
AF_VOL said:
If I was an opposing team, I would use the local contact tracing policy against us. Let's say I am Muschamp and I say (regardless if it's true) that one of the USCe players has tested positive right after the UT game. It seems like that would put UT in the position to have to quarantine players that might have come in contact during the game. That would put us at a serious disadvantage going forward into the next two games. That would give USCe a shot at a better record overall. We could see some biological warfare this season...
Click to expand...
Wouldn't that also mean USCe would have to falsely quarantine that guy and everyone on their team he interacted with, which could be the whole team? Doesn't sound like a good tradeoff, especially against a team you have already played...
 
  • Like
Reactions: OrangenSC, whitw, OptimusPrimerib and 3 others
#168,459
#168,459
BruinVol said:
Did a poster say this team wasn’t being physical at all at practice ??

Click to expand...


Loved that video.

Earlier I posted that Pruitt in his press availability on Saturday said he was disappointed in the lack of physicality by our defensive line. Given who they’re going up against I sort of took that with a grain of salt. In fact it’s my impression that if there is no blood or broken bones Pruitt ain’t going to be satisfied. I think he believes he can take any kid, even an unrated player, and develop them into a first round draft pick for the NFL. I mean, yeah, okay, so he maybe has done that a few times before but seriously, every kid? If you were to be playing for Pruitt my advice would be don’t fight it, just go out there and completely destroy the guy on the other side of the ball, every single time. It’s probably the only way to get him to shut up. jmo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HeadVol77, VolsDoc81TX, Big Orange#1 and 16 others
#168,463
#168,463
AF_VOL said:
If I was an opposing team, I would use the local contact tracing policy against us. Let's say I am Muschamp and I say (regardless if it's true) that one of the USCe players has tested positive right after the UT game. It seems like that would put UT in the position to have to quarantine players that might have come in contact during the game. That would put us at a serious disadvantage going forward into the next two games. That would give USCe a shot at a better record overall. We could see some biological warfare this season...
Click to expand...

Then let's beat the ish out of SC in anticipation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zhangliao04, VolsDoc81TX, escapegoat2 and 4 others
#168,464
#168,464
Devo182 said:
Wouldn't that also mean USCe would have to falsely quarantine that guy and everyone on their team he interacted with, which could be the whole team? Doesn't sound like a good tradeoff, especially against a team you have already played...
Click to expand...

If the contact tracing requirements differ by state/local government/university like everyone is saying, USCe might just have to quarantine the one player. From what it sounds like, UT is having to quarantine anyone who could have contacted the infected player, regardless of their individual test results. It sounds like other schools can clear their players with just a test. I haven't seen the specifics on each school's policies, but that's how I've interpreted it.
 
#168,470
#168,470
BruinVol said:
Did a poster say this team wasn’t being physical at all at practice ??

Click to expand...

😤 I love it! That’s what I like to see! We’re on our way to being the most physical team in the SEC. saw glimpses of it last year... remember pruitts first press conference, “There was a time and place that this university was feared among the SEC teams. My goal... is to get us back to that point.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: HeadVol77, VolsDoc81TX, Brillovol and 12 others
New posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement





Back
Top