VolunteerHillbilly
Spike Drinks, Not Trees
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2005
- Messages
- 40,791
- Likes
- 15,246
The lines will put people in close proximity and make them more likely to catch the virus. Absolutely stupid move.
Yea. Back in Jan the models were saying we should be in the multiple millions of dead by now.
A soon as we put a dollar value on human lives, we risk having everyone who disagrees with their valuation taking to the streets. The AOCs and Bernies of this country could really turn this thing from a poopshow into a real nightmare. The economy will come back. It may take awhile for everyone to catch up and feel confident enough to spend freely but it will come back.The problem is that we've handed over the country to the public health officials. It's obvious that this virus is serious, but so is the danger of an economic depression. All due respect to public health officials, but their only focus is the virus. We need others involved to weigh the economic risks as well
No one is putting a $ value on human lives. If you cant see that the longer this shutdown happens, more people will be harmed than the actual virus, you need to re-evaluate. It's a lazy take to say you either want to save the economy or human life. I'm not really referring to you, I just hate that take on twitter and other social media platformsA soon as we put a dollar value on human lives, we risk having everyone who disagrees with their valuation taking to the streets. The AOCs and Bernies of this country could really turn this thing from a poopshow into a real nightmare. The economy will come back. It may take awhile for everyone to catch up and feel confident enough to spend freely but it will come back.
Whether I agree with it or not, that is how the debate has been framed. If we 'reopen', every single death that happens afterwards will be blamed on greed for money.No one is putting a $ value on human lives. If you cant see that the longer this shutdown happens, more people will be harmed than the actual virus, you need to re-evaluate. It's a lazy take to say you either want to save the economy or human life. I'm not really referring to you, I just hate that take on twitter and other social media platforms
I would argue that the economic factor of millions losing health insurance in the near future will exacerbate the future volatility of the virus and its spread/continued existence.Whether I agree with it or not, that is how the debate has been framed. If we 'reopen', every single death that happens afterwards will be blamed on greed for money.
My guess is there will be a vaccine developed from antibodies of recovered victims before we get round two. Not discounting the health insurance issue. There's not a win/win here.I would argue that the economic factor of millions losing health insurance in the near future will exacerbate the future volatility of the virus and its spread/continued existence.
Governor of Alabama issues a stay at home order. We are only allowed out for grocery shopping or doctor appointments
1502 active cases/4,800,000
under 200 hospitalized
99.97% of Alabama residents virus free now locked inside for an indefinite time
Just to show how awful the IHME model is that Drs Fauci and Birx keep referencing...remember these studies are funded by taxpayer dollars
Yesterday it predicted 121k coronavirus patients in the hospital actual number was 31k. Tennessee was projected to have over 2k actual number 200. Let's take a look at future projections. Right now Alabama has 1543 cases with 212 in the hospital. IHME study projects on
4/17 they will have 27,498 in the hospital. So 212/1543=27,498/X= 200,138 cases...which is more than NY, NJ, CA, FL, LA, MI, MA combined....these are the kind of studies that we are using to make public health policy?
View attachment 269959
We will have millions without health insurance in the next couple of months. The vaccine is likely 18 months away, maybe 12 months if miraculous work is done. That is an economic and public health disaster in the months between those two problems.My guess is there will be a vaccine developed from antibodies of recovered victims before we get round two. Not discounting the health insurance issue. There's not a win/win here.
Maybe not models. Someone found estimates back in Jan based on the spread in China and what was being predicted worldwide. This is from late Jan in the politics forums coronavirus thread...Is that true? You mean globally? Because it doesn’t seem like anyone would have been running models back in January that said that the US would be at millions dead by this point. We didn’t even know we had a case until Jan 20. And there weren’t signs of community spread until later here in the US.