I think in the middle of the 2nd debate between he and Trump, Joe will break down and have a complete dementia moment and stutter to himself, and/or have a breakdown and cry....You and the Dems will have buyer's remorse before this is over.
I think in the middle of the 2nd debate between he and Trump, Joe will break down and have a complete dementia moment and stutter to himself, and/or have a breakdown and cry....
It will be sad and fulfilling at the same time, because the Dems putting him out there at this point is their own doing
Nope. I think the Dem Party decided to get behind Biden because they have nobody else. They probably think they would lose the House and the Presidency with Bernie at the top of the ticket. I am guessing that they think they can hold the House with Biden.You think Sanders has a better chance at defeating Trump?
More of the same video, so Biden tells a voter he's "full of s**t" Listen to first few seconds of the video. What a worthless piece of garbage. He can't handle being challenged
So many issues here:That’s his centrist , union base he talking to like that . It’s always been the Democratic base , he should be very careful here .
I've explained it, you just don't like the explanation because it doesn't end up with Hillary as President. Ask yourself this, and answer it honestly, if Trump had won the popular and Hillary the EC, would you be complaining about it? I don't think you would. I think you'd be perfectly happy with Hillary as your President and you wouldn't be complaining about an "antiquated system" claiming Trump should be President. I'm right, aren't I?
That’s his centrist , union base he talking to like that . It’s always been the Democratic base , he should be very careful here .
So many issues here:
AR-14
You're full of schiff
Pointing his finger within an inch of the guys chest
He's senile and very short tempered. At some point someone is going to knock the schiff out of him
So you’re suggesting large scale gerrymandering to fix the problem? Candidates picking their voters to fix the problem?
This is what happens, the people whom this system benefits argue “it was created this way, so fix it if you want it fixed” instead of actually debating the fairness behind the system.
The onus is on you to change it and your argument of a majority defies the Constitution. If you knew a little about that you'd know that it takes two thirds of a lot of things to change (amend) it. You need to convince a lot of us that the EC needs to change and you're not doing so well.
Biden gets mad too quickly when someone asks or challenges him on issues he has stood for in times past.
He wants to bring back Obama policies from ten years ago & put the same corrupt Obama people in place again to run the country into the ground..
So many issues here:
AR-14
You're full of schiff
Pointing his finger within an inch of the guys chest
He's senile and very short tempered. At some point someone is going to knock the schiff out of him
AR-14 is a real weapon but I still think he misspoke on that, and people in the RNC think this makes Biden look good, not bad.So many issues here:
AR-14
You're full of schiff
Pointing his finger within an inch of the guys chest
He's senile and very short tempered. At some point someone is going to knock the schiff out of him
Have thought a lot about the EC since stumbling into this discussion last night. There is no defense, logical or otherwise, necessary. The onus to defend or prosecute is on those who wish to change the current system.
To answer your second question: just like checks and balances are inherent in our system to ward against tyranny, different pathways to government leadership exist as safeguards from tyranny. Some positions are elected by popular vote, some positions are appointed, and one is elected by appointed Electors. Senators were originally appointed (should still be, imo). Supreme court justices are appointed. There is wisdom in removing the "majority rule" approach as power is condensed. Representatives, have less individual power than Senators, Justices, or the President. Majority rule for Representatives is less dangerous than majority rule for President. Furthermore, the design gives voice to all the governed. The people by Representatives. The states by Senators. And the Federal by the President.