RavinDave
Live to ride. Ride to live.
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2017
- Messages
- 11,144
- Likes
- 16,261
Trump has outstanding civil sexual harassment lawsuits, should he be forced to testify. That ever moving bar that I was speaking of.When has lied under oath? You are projecting. And Clinton was forced to testify bc of a civil suit.
If he testifies and lies then burn him down. How is this difficult?Trump has outstanding civil sexual harassment lawsuits, should he be forced to testify. That ever moving bar that I was speaking of.
Trump’s attempt to dismiss defamation lawsuit from sexual assault accuser shot down by judge
It will be interesting to see how this process goes down and what new information might be brought to light during the process.If he testifies and lies then burn him down. How is this difficult?
Cry me a f***ing river.It will be interesting to see how this process goes down and what new information might be brought to light during the process.
I can tell you he's a lying, cheating, corrupt President that abused his office and obstructed congress. That's just what we know about this one event.
Trump has outstanding civil sexual harassment lawsuits, should he be forced to testify. That ever moving bar that I was speaking of.
Trump’s attempt to dismiss defamation lawsuit from sexual assault accuser shot down by judge
Hillary had nothing to do with the primaries Ace.
The Democrats didn't want the impeachment proceedings to bleed into the general election campaign and so they moved forward without trying to compel witness testimony through the federal court system. It is a political process, with political considerations being made. It's true that Democrats would not allow Republicans to call witnesses such as Alexandra Chalupa, Adam Schiff and the Bidens, but those witnesses were not germane to the core issue of whether or not Donald Trump withheld military aid to the Ukraine in exchange for a campaign favor. The Republicans were trying to deflect and shift the focus away from Trump. The Democrats didn't allow it. I suppose it's reasonable to call that "unfair" because in an actual trial, the defense is allowed to deflect and shift the focus away from the defendant. It's what a good defense team tries to do. The Democrats were in a position to keep that from happening, and so they did.
Is this executive privilege we are talking about, or entitlement? The White House's refusal to comply with the essential function of oversight will set a bad precedent for future administrations to follow... and could come back to bite Republicans one day. Eventually, there will be a President from the Democratic Party again, with a Republican-controlled House of Representatives. Good luck ever getting a subpoena complied with when that day comes.
And just imagine where that 409k (as Trump calls it) would be under Obama!
The S&P 500 Is at an All Time High—But It Still Performed Far Better Under Obama Than Trump
No doubt. Plus, it was rehearsed, chopped up, and Maddow even said they were working on that interview for months. I think this whole Lev deal was fined up perfectly to convince Rep senators that they have to allow more witnesses. The idea is this guy has some crucial and potentially damaging info that we have to hear what he has to say and then the Dems would use him to bust the witness door wide open. That’s what’s going on here.I”ll hazard a guess on that . I’m betting it has something to do with spending all political and media clout for over three years telling the public ... we’ve got him now . The left started filing impeachment articles in July of 2017 , the threat of impeachment never let up until they had enough votes to get it done . This ( IMO) is why people brush it off .
Translation: You're acting like a baby that wastes time bemoaning the fact that you didn't get your way.
Golf trips? It all counts but $7200 isn't even worth the comment