The Impeachment Thread

#23,426
#23,426
GVF said:
Trump has accomplshed more in 3 years than the previous presidents since Clinton. Worst performing president in modern history would be Carter.

The divisiveness was born, bred, and doled out by the libs. Trump will not roll over, and will fight the fight in whatever manner it is took to him.

If him being worst president ever is personal, not professional, grow up.
Click to expand...
They hate him because he has pushed policies that are great for the people and because he fights back. They enjoyed and were used to calling Rs anything they want and them just take it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
#23,428
#23,428
luthervol said:
That's the spirit.
The left gave us Obama. Period. We own it.
The right gave us Trump. Period. You guys should own it.

That's all I'm asking.
Quit trying to blame Trump on the left.
Click to expand...

We own it. And will own it again in 2020. He has your number. Calls you 20 times a day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfanjustin
#23,430
#23,430
luthervol said:
Trump isn't a horse but a pig who enjoys the mud.
What Trump has delivered is the most divisive, embarrassing, and harmful term in modern history.
He will always be remembered as one of the worst, if not the worst, presidents ever.
Click to expand...
Your boy barry was the most divisive, worst President in the history of our country, and yet you all trying to double down and will nominate someone even worse, and I never thought that was possible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
#23,431
#23,431
DinkinFlicka said:
This response is pure conjecture and has no basis in anything anyone has said. Try again.
Click to expand...

You try again. He did not say who Obama did talk like, so how can you judge his comment as bigoted. If you are saying he meant Obama talked white, that would conjecture. Now, if you would care to ask him what he meant, then draw a conclusion of your own, then by all means go ahead. I would even choose to agree depending on the answer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfanjustin
#23,432
#23,432
GVF said:
You try again. He did not say who Obama did talk like, so how can you judge his comment as bigoted. If you are saying he meant Obama talked white, that would conjecture. Now, if you would care to ask him what he meant, then draw a conclusion of your own, then by all means go ahead. I would even choose to agree depending on the answer.
Click to expand...

Lmao. He said "like no other black man," you ****ing rube. How much more specific did he need to be before you finally take the blinders off?
 
#23,433
#23,433
volfanjustin said:
Your boy barry was the most divisive, worst President in the history of our country, and yet you all trying to double down and will nominate someone even worse, and I never thought that was possible.
Click to expand...

Exactly. There was more racial tension, divide, racial violence, fake racial violence, spawn of racial groups under Obama than any other president has or ever will preside over.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood and volfanjustin
#23,436
#23,436
midnight orange said:
“Forensicators first decisive findings, made public in the paper dated July 9, concerned the volume of the supposedly hacked material and what is called the transfer rate—the time a remote hack would require. The metadata established several facts in this regard with granular precision: On the evening of July 5, 2016, 1,976 megabytes of data were downloaded from the DNC’s server. The operation took 87 seconds. This yields a transfer rate of 22.7 megabytes per second.
These statistics are matters of record and essential to disproving the hack theory. No Internet service provider, such as a hacker would have had to use in mid-2016, was capable of downloading data at this speed. Compounding this contradiction, Guccifer claimed to have run his hack from Romania, which, for numerous reasons technically called delivery overheads, would slow down the speed of a hack even further from maximum achievable speeds.”

Time stamps in the metadata indicate the download occurred somewhere on the East Coast of the United States—not Russia, Romania, or anywhere else outside the EDT zone.


Click to expand...

It is so sad how easily duped you guys are. There are about 50 things wrong with this paragraph, but mainly who ever put this together knows not thing one about the internet.

Even average global mobile phone download speeds are faster than that (edit: this part was wrong, except in a very few places, but certainly not globally). For ethernet, I throttle between 100mb and 250mb downloads for my end users at work and we have been at that level for many years.

My home network has been above 50 mbs since at least 2015. I know because my daughter started playing competitive player versus player games then and your lag time can't be noticeable or you get destroyed.

Of course, 5 seconds of research would have revealed this humorous stupidity, but you guys are more committed to your narrative than finding the facts.

Also, his "guccifer claimed" narrative is pretty stupid. Romania has super fast consumer internet, but Guccifer also left his fingerprints on the hack purposefully as cover. The NSA knows every Russian intelligence person involved, which is why they let Mueller publish their real names and addresses in his indictments. It was a huge slap to say "your not as smart as you think you are." Of course, they only have to be smarter that the average Trumplican.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: luthervol
#23,437
#23,437
W.TN.Orange Blood said:
Lol..........you believe in polls that agree to your false hope and stupid agenda.
Click to expand...

I don't put as much stock in polls as I used to because the data is more easily skewed these days but I do trust Vegas to get things right the majority of the time and they have, as of Saturday, a -240/+120 line on impeached/not impeached respectively.
 
#23,438
#23,438
hog88 said:
It takes two to tango and you guys have willingly jumped into the pigpen with him.
Click to expand...
Yep. That was inevitable and completely predictable.
Trump intentionally lowered the level of public discourse and ripped apart the already frayed fabric of society.
Exactly the opposite was needed.
 
#23,439
#23,439
luthervol said:
Yep. That was inevitable and completely predictable.
Trump intentionally lowered the level of public discourse and ripped apart the already frayed fabric of society.
Exactly the opposite was needed.
Click to expand...
You all started that during the Bush years. You all just can't handle this guy fighting back
 
#23,440
#23,440
Rifleman said:
It is so sad how easily duped you guys are. There are about 50 things wrong with this paragraph, but mainly who ever put this together knows not thing one about the internet.

Even average global mobile phone download speeds are faster than that. For ethernet, I throttle between 100mb and 250mb downloads for my end users at work and we have been at that level for many years.

My home network has been above 50 mbs since at least 2015. I know because my daughter started playing competitive player versus player games then and your lag time can't be noticeable or you get destroyed.

Of course, 5 seconds of research would have revealed this humorous stupidity, but you guys are more committed to your narrative than finding the facts.

Also, his "guccifer claimed" narrative is pretty stupid. Romania has super fast consumer internet, but Guccifer also left his fingerprints on the hack purposefully as cover. The NSA knows every Russian intelligence person involved, which is why they let Mueller publish their real names and addresses in his indictments. It was a huge slap to say "your not as smart as you think you are." Of course, they only have to be smarter that the average Trumplican.
Click to expand...
I didn't finish reading this post because i was embarrassed for you. If you're going to condescend, you'd darn well better not show yourself ignorant of the subject.

They calculated it to be in megabytes. Bytes. Not bits, which are smaller, and the measurement used for internet specs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst and NorthDallas40
#23,443
#23,443
DinkinFlicka said:
Lmao. He said "like no other black man," you ****ing rube. How much more specific did he need to be before you finally take the blinders off?
Click to expand...

And he got elected because he was "eloquent." You f***ing rube. It sure wasn't Al Sharpton on that dem ticket. Take your blinders off. How intelligent do you have to be to know that. Same reason you'll never see the Duck Callers on a national ticket. A person has to have "electable qualities", by white standards.
 
#23,444
#23,444
DinkinFlicka said:
I know you're a little slow and you're kind of a firecracker when attempting anything outside the echo chamber, but you should know that this is an incredibly bigoted statement.

Now, I know all you're seeing is "Dink quoted me" or "someone's calling me racist" and you'll likewise be authoring some response about bartending, smoking weed, or that you must be racist if you don't agree with me, but just stop for a second and think about what you just said. You literally implied that all black folks speak a certain (uneducated) way. While I understand where you grew up (remember, I did too), Jackson is not exactly the best sample size to judge any group of people. I know I usually talk smack and make fart jokes, but I'm legitimately trying to point out something inherently ignorant that you said.
Click to expand...
"I mean, you got the first mainstream African American who is articulate and bright and clean, and a nice looking guy." Who said that? Was that WTOB? No, it was Joe Biden.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst, VolnJC and GVF
#23,446
#23,446
Orange_Crush said:
I didn't finish reading this post because i was embarrassed for you. If you're going to condescend, you'd darn well better not show yourself ignorant of the subject.

They calculated it to be in megabytes. Bytes. Not bits, which are smaller, and the measurement used for internet specs.
Click to expand...
Also local network download speeds vs internet backbone which would be used for remote access.

My hardwired home network is GigE and I’ve verified those myself. So local computer to computer would hit those speeds. 125MBps, 1000Mbps. But once you pass thru the firewall that plummets ... just like a remote download would also. And that is consistent with what was reported in your article
 
#23,447
#23,447
Rifleman said:
It is so sad how easily duped you guys are. There are about 50 things wrong with this paragraph, but mainly who ever put this together knows not thing one about the internet.

Even average global mobile phone download speeds are faster than that. For ethernet, I throttle between 100mb and 250mb downloads for my end users at work and we have been at that level for many years.

My home network has been above 50 mbs since at least 2015. I know because my daughter started playing competitive player versus player games then and your lag time can't be noticeable or you get destroyed.

Of course, 5 seconds of research would have revealed this humorous stupidity, but you guys are more committed to your narrative than finding the facts.

Also, his "guccifer claimed" narrative is pretty stupid. Romania has super fast consumer internet, but Guccifer also left his fingerprints on the hack purposefully as cover. The NSA knows every Russian intelligence person involved, which is why they let Mueller publish their real names and addresses in his indictments. It was a huge slap to say "your not as smart as you think you are." Of course, they only have to be smarter that the average Trumplican.
Click to expand...

Like I said, I’m not an expert in digital forensics. I’m also not a Trump supporter or a partisan cheerleader. That being said, what are the errors made in the following paragraph taken from the article?

“What is the maximum achievable speed? Forensicator recently ran a test download of a comparable data volume (and using a server speed not available in 2016) 40 miles from his computer via a server 20 miles away and came up with a speed of 11.8 megabytes per second—half what the DNC operation would need were it a hack. Other investigators have built on this finding. Folden and Edward Loomis say a survey published August 3, 2016, by www.speedtest.net/reports is highly reliable and use it as their thumbnail index. It indicated that the highest average ISP speeds of first-half 2016 were achieved by Xfinity and Cox Communications. These speeds averaged 15.6 megabytes per second and 14.7 megabytes per second, respectively. Peak speeds at higher rates were recorded intermittently but still did not reach the required 22.7 megabytes per second.

“A speed of 22.7 megabytes is simply unobtainable, especially if we are talking about a transoceanic data transfer,” Folden said. “Based on the data we now have, what we’ve been calling a hack is impossible.” Last week Forensicator reported on a speed test he conducted more recently. It tightens the case considerably. “Transfer rates of 23 MB/s (Mega Bytes per second) are not just highly unlikely, but effectively impossible to accomplish when communicating over the Internet at any significant distance,” he wrote. “Further, local copy speeds are measured, demonstrating that 23 MB/s is a typical transfer rate when using a USB–2 flash device (thumb drive).”
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40
#23,448
#23,448
luthervol said:
Yep. That was inevitable and completely predictable.
Trump intentionally lowered the level of public discourse and ripped apart the already frayed fabric of society.
Exactly the opposite was needed.
Click to expand...

To do as you say he has to have a willing opposition to participate.
 
#23,449
#23,449
Orange_Crush said:
I didn't finish reading this post because i was embarrassed for you. If you're going to condescend, you'd darn well better not show yourself ignorant of the subject.

They calculated it to be in megabytes. Bytes. Not bits, which are smaller, and the measurement used for internet specs.
Click to expand...

No, your source for this is an idiot. Make up anything you want, but super fast internet speeds have been around forever. You could download the entirety of the DNC data fairly quickly remotely, or within the network. That one guy says one speedy download existed is proof of a vast conspiracy for you I'm sure, but it is not better than Pizzagate or Q-Anon trash.

The FBI has a full image and all the traffic logs. The NSA monitors all this. You are making stuff up so you can get a narrative that you like.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mick
#23,450
#23,450
midnight orange said:
Like I said, I’m not an expert in digital forensics. I’m also not a Trump supporter or a partisan cheerleader. That being said, what are the errors made in the following paragraph taken from the article?

“What is the maximum achievable speed? Forensicator recently ran a test download of a comparable data volume (and using a server speed not available in 2016) 40 miles from his computer via a server 20 miles away and came up with a speed of 11.8 megabytes per second—half what the DNC operation would need were it a hack. Other investigators have built on this finding. Folden and Edward Loomis say a survey published August 3, 2016, by www.speedtest.net/reports is highly reliable and use it as their thumbnail index. It indicated that the highest average ISP speeds of first-half 2016 were achieved by Xfinity and Cox Communications. These speeds averaged 15.6 megabytes per second and 14.7 megabytes per second, respectively. Peak speeds at higher rates were recorded intermittently but still did not reach the required 22.7 megabytes per second.

“A speed of 22.7 megabytes is simply unobtainable, especially if we are talking about a transoceanic data transfer,” Folden said. “Based on the data we now have, what we’ve been calling a hack is impossible.” Last week Forensicator reported on a speed test he conducted more recently. It tightens the case considerably. “Transfer rates of 23 MB/s (Mega Bytes per second) are not just highly unlikely, but effectively impossible to accomplish when communicating over the Internet at any significant distance,” he wrote. “Further, local copy speeds are measured, demonstrating that 23 MB/s is a typical transfer rate when using a USB–2 flash device (thumb drive).”
Click to expand...
Yep when doing local transfers the network speed isn’t always the driver. For a thumb drive using EEPROMs their write speeds will throttle the transfer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: midnight orange
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top