The Impeachment Thread

[evillawyer]

I think he goes by Jizzy Gym Jo now.

I was thinking the duck shape is fitting since he's a quack.

 

[NorthDallas40]

I mean you saw my response to @SpaceCoastVol right?

Dude you’re not gonna be getting much attention and mostly one liners from me for the rest of the day. Been like that since after lunch. Trying to wrap up a code review before I go on a week of leave out of the state.

So no I didn’t or if I did I don’t remember it.

 

[RockyTop85]

So no I didn’t or if I did I don’t remember it.

Exactly.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

Dude you’re not gonna be getting much attention and mostly one liners from me for the rest of the day. Been like that since after lunch. Trying to wrap up a code review before I go on a week of leave out of the state.

So no I didn’t or if I did I don’t remember it.

Frankly my dear.........I wish the two of you would go get a room to talk this out......nobody cares...

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

Document Request: Senate Judiciary Starts Probing Joe and Hunter Biden, Burisma

At the very least, we should see reprimands of some kind.....Dims will dismiss it as a "right-wing conspiracy".

 

[VolnJC]

 

[Velo Vol]

I agree with these things as stated. I don’t see them as incompatible with what I’ve said, but am curious if you do.

Perhaps I seized upon a sentence in one of your posts and took it out of context. But it seemed you were making a conservative "never Trump" argument.

I just had a minor, but meaningful issue with how you framed "conservative" Republicans versus "liberal" Democrats.

You stated that liberals use government to push their morality. Well, that may be somewhat true of the last decade's SJW crowd. But I say a better description of post-New Deal progressives is that they believe in a government with a more managerial role over society, with the goal of limiting harm to individuals. Raising the floor, if you will. Whereas conservatives believe in a more limited role of government, paying particular attention to the "harm" it causes, when it lowers the potential (ceiling) for individual achievement.

Either way you frame it, it's clear Trump isn't a conservative. And furthermore is an overall bad person.

 

[evillawyer]

Document Request: Senate Judiciary Starts Probing Joe and Hunter Biden, Burisma

At the very least, we should see reprimands of some kind.....

Do you guys have some sort of weird blue balls fetish? Is this some masochistic thing Dems don't get?

 

[hUTch2002]

I’m kind of beyond caring what people call it as long as they acknowledge that he clearly did it and that it was clearly wrong.

Tell me why it’s not impeachable, but this idea that it’s unproven at this point is disconnected from reality.

Oh RT you silly thing. “It” is not impeachable. I’m not even sure what “it” you are saying is proven but if you are saying that Trump bribed Zelensky with aid to get him to dig up dirt on Biden so he could win the 2020 election then “it” most certainly is not proven. At best you have that Trump wanted Zelensky to publicly state he would investigate 2016 corruption regarding election interference and Burisma. But he never made the statement and aid was released after multiple meetings to confirm Zelensky was what he purported to be during his campaign.

 

[NorthDallas40]

Exactly.

Yes dear.

Frankly my dear.........I wish the two of you would go get a room to talk this out......nobody cares...

STFU you crotchety old bastard.

 

[GVF]

The Dems were all about moral relativism before Trump got elected.

Now pro-Trump republicans are too.

Very wrong. They abandoned that on many occasions.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

Yes dear.

STFU you crotchety old bastard.

I take that as a badge of honor.....72 will be jealous now.

 

[volinsd]

Gymmy Jo appeals to the insecure wife beaters out there also upset with uppity women.

No one is upset by so called "uppity" women EL. Just ignorant beeches.

 

[GVF]

Document Request: Senate Judiciary Starts Probing Joe and Hunter Biden, Burisma

At the very least, we should see reprimands of some kind.....Dims will dismiss it as a "right-wing conspiracy".

It may not sound like much but it goes on record. But I would be supportive of a censure since this other is a rabbit hole.

 

[hjeagle1vol]

Do you guys have some sort of weird blue balls fetish? Is this some masochistic thing Dems don't get?

Beats the hell out of a drygina full of cat hair. jmo

 

[Orangeburst]

White House backs full Senate trial if House impeaches Trump

Looks like the WH is on board with a full Senate trial. Call in all sorts of people including Hunter, WB, Schiff, whoever. Nancy, lets get this thing started already as the American people deserve to know.

 

[evillawyer]

 

[hUTch2002]

Shadow of a doubt is not a legal standard

Preponderance of the evidence, clear and convincing, or beyond a reasonable doubt are the standards.

Note that impeachment is not criminal, so it's not clear that beyond a reasonable doubt would even be required.

Considering the framers specified high crimes and misdemeanors and the seriousness of removing the President I would say that the criminal requirement of beyond reasonable doubt would be the standard over preponderance of the evidence.

 

[Weezer]

It was still withheld. No harm, no foul does not apply when it comes to bribery.

I'm sorry, this just made me laugh because no harm, no foul was Hillary's defense for her emails and it worked for her and the left ate it up.

 

[NorthDallas40]

Good. Hurry the hell up and get this waste of time over with.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Beats the hell out of a drygina full of cat hair. jmo

Savage

 

[BowlBrother85]

I'm sorry, this just made me laugh because no harm, no foul was Hillary's defense for her emails and it worked for her and the left ate it up.

I believe that she said "What difference does it make?"....

 

[RockyTop85]

Very wrong. They abandoned that on many occasions.

How are you defining moral relativism?

 

[RockyTop85]

Oh RT you silly thing. “It” is not impeachable. I’m not even sure what “it” you are saying is proven but if you are saying that Trump bribed Zelensky with aid to get him to dig up dirt on Biden so he could win the 2020 election then “it” most certainly is not proven. At best you have that Trump wanted Zelensky to publicly state he would investigate 2016 corruption regarding election interference and Burisma. But he never made the statement and aid was released after multiple meetings to confirm Zelensky was what he purported to be during his campaign.

You don’t know what it is but it’s not impeachable.

Let’s do it piece by piece:

1. There was a concerted effort to leverage Ukraine to conduct investigations into crowdstrike and Biden/Burisma.

That has been proven. Agree it disagree?

 

[Orangeburst]

You don’t know what it is but it’s not impeachable.

Let’s do it piece by piece:

1. There was a concerted effort to leverage Ukraine to conduct investigations into crowdstrike and Biden/Burisma.

That has been proven. Agree it disagree?

Joe Biden or Hunter Biden?