Head of Burisma Indicted

#76
#76
So the tittle of this article is the head of Burisma is indicted and “sub-title” is Biden is going to prison. Neither of these things is backed up by the article in the original post.
Correct. Just suspicion. Nothing concrete as of now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tvolsfan
#78
#78
Zero experience in Ukraine. Zero experience in energy. Didn’t relocate to Ukraine.

$83,333.33 per month ($1 million per year) for 38 months ($3.167 million) for his last name and the access/influence that name could leverage.

The media and Democrats won’t even admit an appearance of a conflict of interest.

Are you seriously trying to defend this?
Oh I don't know, kinda sounds like a quid pro quo to me.
 
#79
#79
Press conference..you can use Google translate...mentions Biden and receiving criminal funds with help in money laundering...we shouldn't be giving Ukraine any money and the case against Burisma shouldn't have been closed..rumor is they bribed the prosecutor to end it
 
  • Like
Reactions: Obsessed
#80
#80
Press conference..you can use Google translate...mentions Biden and receiving criminal funds with help in money laundering...we shouldn't be giving Ukraine any money and the case against Burisma shouldn't have been closed..rumor is they bribed the prosecutor to end it


Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolnJC
#81
#81
Also Hunter is a daddy!

Yup...
Hillary-Clinton-Baby-Playing-with-Carriage-on-the-Beach-86761.jpg
 
#89
#89
And for the record, there was suspicion of the founder well before Hunter Biden ever worked there.
No doubt... but it’s not exactly a giant leap to connect the dots here. It’s absolutely insane that red flags didnt get raised when the sitting VP’s son got added to the board of a Ukrainian company.
 
#90
#90
No doubt... but it’s not exactly a giant leap to connect the dots here. It’s absolutely insane that red flags didnt get raised when the sitting VP’s son got added to the board of a Ukrainian company.
It looks swampy, but I’ve yet to see any reason for investigation of the Biden’s, other than one man thinks it will help his re-election campaign.
 
#94
#94
Dare I say... It's obvious quid pro quo.
Are you talking about Joe Biden? Because there’s no reason to think his demanding the prosecutor get fired was for his self interest. The prosecutor himself had let the case against Burisma stall, and the EU, IMF, and even Republican senators wanted him fired. Surely you can’t think that was all about protecting Hunter Biden.
 
#97
#97
Are you talking about Joe Biden? Because there’s no reason to think his demanding the prosecutor get fired was for his self interest. The prosecutor himself had let the case against Burisma stall, and the EU, IMF, and even Republican senators wanted him fired. Surely you can’t think that was all about protecting Hunter Biden.
LMAO again! 🤣
 
It's plain as the nose on your face that the Bidens used Joe's office for personal gain and Joe applied political pressure to help his son.
So why did senators Rob Portman and Ron Johnson support the move? Why did other Western European countries support the move? Why would he want to fire a prosecutor who had basically stalled the investigation if it was about protecting his son?
 

Advertisement



Back
Top