Unconditional Surrender
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2017
- Messages
- 3,375
- Likes
- 6,034
I believe Q needs a second look and a chance to stay at home. JMHO as always!
Hold on dude I was only giving an opinion!!! Who is that....comfortable with that group!Hey, Barnes is being paid good money to make these decisions. If he decides to head into next season with Turner and James as the options at point, that's his call. If we got another PG, that would give him some flexibility with James. Gotta say I'm not that comfortable with what we have with Walker, Burns, Pons, Fulkerson and Kent....and hell, that's almost half the roster.
What about Burns makes you uncomfortable?Hey, Barnes is being paid good money to make these decisions. If he decides to head into next season with Turner and James as the options at point, that's his call. If we got another PG, that would give him some flexibility with James. Gotta say I'm not that comfortable with what we have with Walker, Burns, Pons, Fulkerson and Kent....and hell, that's almost half the roster.
Geez...uncomfortable with the 2 highest rated players on our team. Rest easy, chicken little.
I provided you Bone and Turner's respective stats during the 6 postseason games in an earlier post. At worst, they played equally well. I'd argue Turner outplayed him when I consider both ends of the court. Sure, we'd all love some additional depth, and we will most likely wind up getting some.I wasn't impressed with Turner running the offense when he spelled Bone. He was fine defensively. James is a true freshman. Don't care how high he's rated, he's yet to prove anything as a college player in the SEC. The same could be said for any freshman coming in. I'd feel much better if we had another proven/experienced PG on the roster. Just think we need to find someone from the transfer portal to add a little extra depth at the spot.
I am an Alum of Saint Louis University and I also follow the Billikens Basketball team as well as the Vols. The following was posted today about a potential rule change the NCAA may make for the 5th year grad transfers. I was just wondering if anyone else was aware of this possible change? I am copying this from the Billikens fan website.
In two weeks, the N.C.A.A.’s primary legislative body, the Division I Council, will vote on a measure that could severely restrict graduate transfers. The proposed rule change would require that colleges accepting graduate transfers be docked a scholarship the next year if the transfer does not earn his secondary degree within a year.
The proposal, which could go into effect as soon as Aug. 1, would apply to only three sports — football, women’s basketball and men’s basketball — but appears particularly aimed at men’s basketball.
Justin Sell conceded objections about practicality (many graduate programs take two years to complete) and fairness (the rule does not apply to athletes who compete as graduate students without transferring) were fair, but said his group’s intent was to “manage behavior.”
I'd rather just see them do away with grad transfers instead, if given those two options. It doesn't seem fair to punish the school for a kid refusing to fulfill his academic requirements to obtain a degree. The schools have no manner of leverage in which to enforce a student to return for a year once his eligibility is up.