Vol4ever
Junior Member
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2005
- Messages
- 2,515
- Likes
- 1,692
This is the most bull**** statement I've ever read from you. There's 0 ZERO CERO ZILCH NADA guarantee these students athletes make it in whatever professional sports they are lucky enough to be drafted into.Yeah but if you’re an economist you get something out of sitting through Econ 101. There’s literally no reason for a football player to be there.
except there is. he's on scholarship at a university. and to get the exposure and beneifts that come allong with being a scholarship athelete, you have to maintain your grades.Yeah but if you’re an economist you get something out of sitting through Econ 101. There’s literally no reason for a football player to be there.
I just don’t understand why football players don’t have the rights of other adults and specifically other students.
If you’re unhappy in your job, you find another job. If a college student is unhappy at TN Tech, they transfer to Austin Peay or UT. It’s not complicated.
Why do we punish football players and not allow them to do what literally everyone else is allowed to do?
That’s not what I asked. You said:They have a buyout that needs to be paid. Whether they pay it or the school they're going to pays it. Most of the time the buyout that's getting paid is more than what goes into 1 year of a student athlete's scholarship.
so how do you feel about coaches leaving for better opportunities?He should stick with his school/commitment until he graduates. When that happens his commitment is done and he can go to another school.
Well, what I’m saying is players who want to go pro should be allowed to do so immediately. If they don’t make it then they don’t make it. But that is fair - and allows the free market to make the decision.except there is. he's on scholarship at a university. and to get the exposure and beneifts that come allong with being a scholarship athelete, you have to maintain your grades.
so are you advocating that scholarship atheltes simply move on to campus for 3-4 years and do nothing but play their respective sport?
what about the ones that wont' go pro? how do we determine which ones wont' and which ones will? who should go to class and who doesn't?
they just live there, play football and in 3-4 years, they're done.......? what happens after for hte ones that didn't go pro?
well, that sucks for them. it's still not a reason to change the whole system.Because for many that is a benefit that does not matter to them and they do not want.
So being unhappy is being unhappy.
when, just now? cuase that's not what you've been saying. you've been saying these guys shoudl be able to do whatever they want.....or don't want...to do.Well, what I’m saying is players who want to go pro should be allowed to do so immediately. If they don’t make it then they don’t make it. But that is fair - and allows the free market to make the decision.
If you are someone who wants to go to college - and play football while doing so - then it is a great option for you and Tennessee would love to have you.
A degree is useless for most of those guys. If we’re getting down to it the biggest issue is that they’re made to go to college to advance their professional prospects.
It’d be like if I told you the only way to be an astronaut would be if you did 4 years as a welders apprentice.
Uh, I am sorry, but a degree is not useless for anyone ever. It may not lead to the career that someone really wants, but it's better to have it than not have it.A degree is useless for most of those guys. If we’re getting down to it the biggest issue is that they’re made to go to college to advance their professional prospects.
It’d be like if I told you the only way to be an astronaut would be if you did 4 years as a welders apprentice.
no, apparently you should have just played football better. cause then, it shouldn't matter what you do. you can do whatever you want.Well, in order to practice law, I had to have both a bachelor's degree and a JD degree. So, I guess I should have been upset that they required me to do that to "advance my professional prospects."
What difference does it make what they are told their whole lives? When they sign a legal and binding contract for 4 years, including the University committing to 4 years, then you can babble about them “sticking with their commitment”. Someone mentioned earlier something about scholarships being a 4 year agreement and after research, they aren’t. They are 1 year agreements that the University can break after any year without penalty .Because they're not believing that. These kids have been told they're A #1 their whole lives and then want to quit or transfer when reality hits. Fields chose Georgia. He should stick with his school/commitment until he graduates. When that happens his commitment is done and he can go to another school.
but it's not unfair. everyone operates under the same rules. it's completely fair.It is if the system is unfair to a certain group of people.
I think you kinda missed his point.Well, in order to practice law, I had to have both a bachelor's degree and a JD degree. So, I guess I should have been upset that they required me to do that to "advance my professional prospects."