Recruiting Forum Football Talk [RIP 9.3.2019]

Status
Not open for further replies.
#64,678
#64,678
Was just looking at other coaches that run a variation of the Briles system and didn’t realize that Dino Babers runs a variation of it or at least uses some principles from it from when he was at Baylor coaching WRs. His supposedly is leaned more towards Air-raid mixed with Briles principles.

I know some of have wondered about whether or not it can work in the SEC and they should read these articles. Talks about how Briles especially loved massive OL and wanted a downhill physical run game to complement the spread passing attack so teams that who would try and line up 3-3-5 or had a strong front 4 and wanted to leave the leave the box bare to protect the pass would get run down and abused in the trenches. This eliminates teams from moving a DE and LBs towards the hashes to be able to help on the edge of the field. Kendall puts a much bigger emphasis, like his father did, in downhill running that is needed in the SE

I really think this can be an offense that not only survives but thrives in the SEC. Hopefully someone that knows more about Xs and Os can expand on this.

What will 2018 hold for the Veer and Shoot?

The Dino Babers offense
 
  • Like
Reactions: nicksjuzunk, BennesseeVols, Paper_Towel and 2 others
#64,679
#64,679
OGbabyaviVol said:
Who cares! What is it going to take for everyone to understand that until we start winning consistently, the media is going to find anything they can to be negative about and bash our program, because it drives clicks which makes them money. When we are winning again, then they will be more positive, because that will drive clicks as well, which makes them more money. Just win!
Click to expand...
hes-right-you-know-32476920.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: OGbabyaviVol and GoBigOrangeUT
#64,684
#64,684
BruinVol said:
I think jg would do great as a passer under Briles but I just can't see him approaching 500 yards as a rusher. Maybe that offense doesn't need that QB rushing but from history it seems that way
Click to expand...

If it’s Briles I think there’s gonna be quite a few adjustments from what he’s run before, this might be a part.

He has the offensive mind to do it
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vols410
#64,693
#64,693
Bassmaster_Vol said:
No. First of all, Schiano sucks and we were right to not want him on that point. But secondly, his name was mentioned UNDER OATH, as witnessing it and saying nothing. That, added on to his suckiness, made him unhireable. The only thing against Kendall is that his last name is Briles. It’s a lot different
Click to expand...

No, it's not. I don't like Schiano as a coach and think he would have been a terrible fit here, but the whole Penn State thing was blown out of proportion. McQeary said he was told by another person that Schiano knew, years after the fact I believe. When the person who supposedly told McQeary was asked, he said he never told McQeary that. It was all second hand, never proven information.

Your defense of Briles is rooted solely in him being a good coach. His father was crooked, and the son knew nothing? Far less plausible than the Schiano situation.

If you want to be dishonest with yourself and not look at the facts of each case, go ahead, but it makes you look extremely foolish.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KokoBVol
#64,696
#64,696
BruinVol said:
But doesn't the QB run a lot under briles?
Click to expand...

Under Montgomery as OC with Briles the QBs ran more. It isn’t a necessity in the Briles system. Bryce Petty looked like an all star in the system and only ran for like 100 yards one year and 200 another year.
 
#64,699
#64,699
Weezer said:
No, it's not. I don't like Schiano as a coach and think he would have been a terrible fit here, but the whole Penn State thing was blown out of proportion. McQeary said he was told by another person that Schiano knew, years after the fact I believe. When the person who supposedly told McQeary was asked, he said he never told McQeary that. It was all second hand, never proven information.

Your defense of Briles is rooted solely in him being a good coach. His father was crooked, and the son knew nothing? Far less plausible than the Schiano situation.

If you want to be dishonest with yourself and not look at the facts of each case, go ahead, but it makes you look extremely foolish.
Click to expand...
No, what’s foolish is making assumptions about someone with no factual support or even any evidence and trying to keep them from working. Which is what you’re doing.

Briles wasn’t named, wasn’t convicted, or even accused. If his name wasn’t Briles there would be nothing here.

But anyway, for the majority of us, we didn’t want Schiano because he sucks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Paper_Towel, barrylee, B EaZy40 and 2 others
#64,700
#64,700
I wonder how he will be recruiting? He’ll have to have his facts together and be able to deliver that message coherently.

Also, I wonder what bailey thinks of this? No playbook in a very atypical offense doesn’t prepare you in some aspects of being an NFL QB. Gotta think he’ll be enticed by offensive production though
 
New posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement



Back
Top