volfanjustin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2009
- Messages
- 22,634
- Likes
- 23,597
Been that way for better part of two weeks now. Obstruct obstruct obstruct... at whatever cost to Kavanaugh and his family.This is sickening to watch happen. I've never seen such overt character assassination in my life. It's unconscionable that 3 accusers just happened to all converge at the end of the confirmation process.
This is sickening to watch happen. I've never seen such overt character assassination in my life. It's unconscionable that 3 accusers just happened to all converge at the end of the confirmation process.
That's what has been said and yet, no one has seen these therapist notes to know if that is even true. Same with the polygraph, no one has seen the results or the questions that were asked during it.Honestly, it's the only thing supporting her story. If this weren't part of the story, the vote would have occurred by now and K would be on the bench.
That's what has been said and yet, no one has seen these therapist notes to know if that is even true. Same with the polygraph, no one has seen the results or the questions that were asked during it.
If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck.... it's a political dirty trick.Is it? So, you think there couldn't be those who were afraid to step up before Ford decided to?
It's not like Kavanaugh has been the nomination for an eternity. Not plausible that people that knew he was not the person he was trying to portray himself, and found the courage to speak out?
It's a big deal to put yourself in the spotlight of a SCOTUS nomination. The confirmation process should allow for these testimonies, I'm guessing this third accuser might make that possible.
If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck.... it's a political dirty trick.
There's a timeline that's been in place for weeks. The Democrats knew that and kept these allegations in their back pocket. Everybody with a shred of intellectual honesty knows it.
Well, the Republicans have been calling this a smear campaign. The fact that she named him six years ago would make this less likely.
I've seen where his name was mentioned recently, but not in 2012. Maybe I missed it.Several people have said she told them including his name as early as 2012 and since then.
Are they lying? Who knows.
Did she tell them because she believes it but is mistaken? Who knows.
Did it really happen? Who knows.
However, it does lend credibility to her statement.