Kavanaugh Confirmation

#5,051
#5,051
volinbham said:
Hearing tomorrow should go on as planned. I'm sure questions from the allegations will make their way into the K questioning.

Swetnick and Ramirez should give sworn testimony to the committee in some form. Vote should be delayed a reasonable amount of time (1 week?) to provide this opportunity.

If 1, 2 or all 3 have sufficient credibility after testifying to the committee then an FBI investigation is ordered or K drops out.
Click to expand...

I think Trump will pull him by 5:00 PM today. They'll move on to Barrett. All the conservative views of Kavanaugh (and then some), but none of the bad boy baggage.
 
#5,052
#5,052
evillawyer said:
I don't know how you just ignore these unless the GOP can immediately shoot her down as a fraud with some hard evidence.
Click to expand...
giphy-downsized-large.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Crush
#5,055
#5,055
0nelilreb said:
Go back and read the post . He said he didn’t give a sh*t because ..... My post wasn’t anymore reactionary as a matter of fact mine wouldn’t destroy anyone name , life or career , only that my vote would just offset his . The whole Dems don’t care if they destroy an innocent man reputation , the media and liberal congressmen and women have already proven that to be true without hearing all the facts .
Click to expand...

You just happened to be on the trailing end of the escalation. Didn't mean to single you out. And yeah it goes both ways, I know.

Most people have picked a favorite in this mess, it's a tough call for me.
 
#5,061
#5,061
Stew Cook said:
You just happened to be on the trailing end of the escalation. Didn't mean to single you out. And yeah it goes both ways, I know.

Most people have picked a favorite in this mess, it's a tough call for me.
Click to expand...

I tried hard to be open and fair to both sides and willing to hear both the accusers account from her own mouth not through a lawyer . We already know K says he didn’t do it . It’s hard to keep an open mind when you hear BSthat you know is BS trying to be passed off like it’s not political . The good thing about what mic posted is he as being honest and I believe that’s how he thinks .
 
#5,063
#5,063
evillawyer said:
From one of the affidavits submitted by Ford:


“Christine did not mention the assault to me again until June 29, 2018, two days after Justice Anthony Kennedy announced his resignation from the Supreme Court of the United States,” he said.

On that day, Koegler said Ford revealed to him in an email that the person who had assaulted her in high school was President Donald Trump’s “favorite for SCOTUS.”

In his response email, Koegler wrote, “I remember you telling me about him, but I don’t remember his name. Do you mind telling me so I can read about him?”

Ford’s emailed response: “Brett Kavanaugh.”
Click to expand...

I guess copies of that email chain will be attached to the affidavit.
 
#5,064
#5,064
evillawyer said:
I
Interesting, but none of the major outlets (CNN, fox, WaPo, nytimes) are running this story yet. Wonder if there's something fishy going on here (Avenatti getting trolled?).
Click to expand...
Avenatti releases client’s identity, allegations against Kavanaugh

“I also witnessed efforts by Mark Judge, Brett Kavanaugh and others to cause girls to become inebriated and disoriented so they could then be ‘gang raped’ in a side room or bedroom by a ‘train’ of numerous boys ... These boys included Mark Judge and Brett Kavanaugh ... In approximately 1982, I became the victim of one of these ‘gang’ or ‘train’ rapes where Mark Judge and Brett Kavanaugh were present,” she added.
 
#5,065
#5,065
0nelilreb said:
I tried hard to be open and fair to both sides and willing to hear both the accusers account from her own mouth not through a lawyer . We already know K says he didn’t do it . It’s hard to keep an open mind when you hear BSthat you know is BS trying to be passed off like it’s not political . The good thing about what mic posted is he as being honest and I believe that’s how he thinks .
Click to expand...

I agree, on all those points. One thing this confirmation process has not been is boring.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 0nelilreb
#5,067
#5,067
evillawyer said:
I
Interesting, but none of the major outlets (CNN, fox, WaPo, nytimes) are running this story yet. Wonder if there's something fishy going on here (Avenatti getting trolled?).
Click to expand...

maybe they are feeling burned by the Ramirez incident and want to dig a little deeper.

in the mean time they can run another "K used to get drunk some times" story quoting the same couple of people.
 
#5,070
#5,070
volinbham said:
maybe they are feeling burned by the Ramirez incident and want to dig a little deeper.

in the mean time they can run another "K used to get drunk some times" story quoting the same couple of people.
Click to expand...
Lots are starting to notice the silence. Thinking Avenatti may have been duped here. Could this be a project veritas type job?

 
#5,075
#5,075
evillawyer said:
So, how do Swetnick allegations change the landscape? Initial thoughts?
Click to expand...
- Found it interesting that this recollection was over roughly a 3 year span (81'.82' and 83')
- She was aware that Judge and Kavanaugh were secretly using drugs and alcohol to subdue females in 81' and 82' to "gang rape" them. This caused her to purposefully stay away from the punch that had been spiked.
- She has a pretty vivid description of boys lining up outside of rooms for their turn.
- Then at some point in 82' she was a victim of this drugging and was gang raped.

Credibility questions that I would have.

1. Given the detail in which you have described these boys intentions and successes to drug and rape unwilling girls at these party's (multiple occasions) was there every a sense of urgency on your part to report it? Would you consider it wrong if you didn't knowing people were being raped and how that was actually happening?

2. Was there ever a point where you thought (considering this wasn't 1 party or instance) that if Im not going to report this or at least advise those that were being raped as to what was happening to them, Im not gonna be a victim of this?

3. Give the years you listed, (81', 82' and 83') as the years you attended over 10 parties. Is it safe to assume since your recollection of your rape was in 82', that you continued to attend these parties even after that event?
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols, TN-POSSUM, davethevol and 1 other person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top