Kavanaugh Confirmation

[LouderVol]

Don't worry grasshopper. The GOP members of the Judiciary Committee have already said "they'll hear the lady out," but it's not going to make a difference in how they vote.

can you blame them with how shady she has been? Whatever inconsistencies Kavanaugh has had in his statements, she has been far worse. if this hadn't been a clear political hack job they might have handled it differently. unfortunately the democrats made it a political hack job.

 

[golfballs]

See, here's a case with actual evidence
Police Report: Polis Pushed Female Employee

The Dem candidate for governor of Colorado shoved a woman and left her bruised. Wait... this story broke yesterday! Did any MSM outlet cover this?? Of course not.

 

[evillawyer]

Breaking. Avenatti has submitted a sworn declaration from his client to counsel for the judiciary committee. Name is Julie Swetnick.

Sorry if this is locked for you

 

[Squints]

 

[volinbham]

strong accusations.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Delay, delay, delay.

Oh, and respect her privacy. LULZ

 

[txbo]

That I agree with. He wasn’t force to add those factual statements.

In fact if the moonbats would actually attack that angle and point to a lack of critical thinking on Ks part I’d give them credit.

Yep. It gave me flashbacks of watching Bill and Hillary talking about their marriage.

 

[Stew Cook]

I only have one opinion to go along with my one vote so I’m going to use it to cancel Mics out now ... I don’t give a Sh*t what you liberals think , I don’t care if you cry , whine ,kick ,and scream , lie or delay . He should be voted onto the SC just because of the way your party of emotional infants have acted .

Wow, for every action there is exponentially greater reaction, on here.

I think Mick had suggested that he thought he Ford was probably telling the truth and only suggested that he didn't care what goofballs thought about the Dems motives, after he was called an idiot minion.

It didn't take long for that to get spun-up to democrats don't mind to destroy an innocent man's reputation.. etc

 

[evillawyer]

strong accusations.

Yep.

 

[Stew Cook]

Meanwhile, back at the batty cave...View attachment 169998

I agree, much like a real-life Batman.

 

[Boston Vol]

strong accusations.

So is she saying that she was raped by Kavanaugh? She says in the statement that he was “present” at the party in which she was assaulted. That’s a grey area.

 

[SLICKYINC]

This whole thing is as fake as the 'lawyer' arguing about it in here. There's more proof bigfoot and aliens exist.

 

[evillawyer]

So, how do Swetnick allegations change the landscape? Initial thoughts?

 

[Boston Vol]

Delay, delay, delay.

Oh, and respect her privacy. LULZ

I’m sure it’s a coincidence that he dropped this the day before Ford’s hearing.

 

[Boston Vol]

So, how do Swetnick allegations change the landscape? Initial thoughts?

Will certainly delay things

 

[volfanjustin]

Will certainly delay things

Better not

 

[Obsessed]

This whole thing is as fake as the 'lawyer' arguing about it in here. There's more proof bigfoot and aliens exist.

There’s damn sure more evidence of Bigfoot and aliens

 

[0nelilreb]

Wow, for every action there is exponentially greater reaction, on here.

I think Mick had suggested that he thought he Ford was probably telling the truth and only suggested that he didn't care what goofballs thought about the Dems motives, after he was called an idiot minion.

It didn't take long for that to get spun-up to democrats don't mind to destroy an innocent man's reputation.. etc

Go back and read the post . He said he didn’t give a sh*t because ..... My post wasn’t anymore reactionary as a matter of fact mine wouldn’t destroy anyone name , life or career , only that my vote would just offset his . The whole Dems don’t care if they destroy an innocent man reputation , the media and liberal congressmen and women have already proven that to be true without hearing all the facts .

 

[evillawyer]

Will certainly delay things

I don't know how you just ignore these unless the GOP can immediately shoot her down as a fraud with some hard evidence.

 

[golfballs]

So is she saying that she was raped by Kavanaugh? She says in the statement that he was “present” at the party in which she was assaulted. That’s a grey area.

Clearly not. More BS.

 

[Obsessed]

I don't know how you just ignore these unless the GOP can immediately shoot her down as a fraud with some hard evidence.

How about she provide hard evidence of the crime?

The burden is on the prosecution

 

[volinbham]

So, how do Swetnick allegations change the landscape? Initial thoughts?

Hearing tomorrow should go on as planned. I'm sure questions from the allegations will make their way into the K questioning.

Swetnick and Ramirez should give sworn testimony to the committee in some form. Vote should be delayed a reasonable amount of time (1 week?) to provide this opportunity.

If 1, 2 or all 3 have sufficient credibility after testifying to the committee then an FBI investigation is ordered or K drops out.

 

[SLICKYINC]

So now there is another scallywag who didn't go to the authorities. Imagine that...

 

[golfballs]

I’m sure it’s just a coincidence that Avenatti’s allegation didn’t slot in an alleged date (“Beach Week”) until after Kavanaugh’s calendars were made public, using the exact term he put on his calendar.

 

[Obsessed]

So now there is another scallywag who didn't go to the authorities. Imagine that...

Check(s) finally cleared