JG's completion % = 61.9%
KC's completion % = 54.2%
People have believe this myth that JG can't make smart throws, but his completion % was pretty damn good for a freshman playing behind an Oline with walk-ons "blocking" for him. I just don't understand for the life of me how our fans can judge JG off of last year. Then they think that a senior that got benched, and then outplayed by an underclassman is going to come in and be our savior. JG will win the job and look like a completely different player this year, watch and see!
There's always a reality behind stats. JG was protected by A LOT of short throws and single receiver reads. That limited the O and resulted in a significant drop off in point production after he became the starter. Even in the UMass game Jones sub-d JG in after Dormady had led them to scores on the last two drives of the 1st half and the second drive of the 2nd half. JG led three consecutive drives that netted 10 yards before QD returned and was unable to reestablish rhythm.
The biggest thing to look at with a QB is the effectiveness of the O. In JG's 6 starts, UT avg'd just over 16 ppg. He got LSU and Bama but also the SEC's worst D in Vandy, UK, and Mizzou who all finished 8th or worse in both scoring and total D... plus a pretty bad So Miss team.
Yes there were plenty of OL and WR problems but JG was ineffective also. Taking 26 drive killing sacks was a huge part of that ineffectiveness.
Just for fairness sack... Dormady took 4 sacks in 5 starts. He threw the ball away or got it out quicker because he understood the reads and plays better. Let's say JG just had 1 sack per game and threw 20 away to avoid the losses. His completion % drops into the mid 50's... which you suggest is the reason KC isn't as good.
I'm very hopeful that JG has grown and will be the "guy". He has FAR more physical talent than KC. IMHO, KC is physically limited and it would only get worse against SEC DB's and DC's.
BUT... if you are going to make arguments like the one you did above then you establish a standard that can be turned on JG as well. Neither of these QB's has played well enough in the past to lead UT to a good season. In overall performance to include game management... KC has played a little better and he's won some games as a starter but that's somewhat expected considering he was surrounded by a better team with a better O system and coaching.
We're going to have to see if JG has claimed the job. I hope he has because his ceiling is so much higher than KC. But he's going to have to prove himself. He hasn't yet.