butchna
Sit down and tell me all about it...way over there
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2013
- Messages
- 106,825
- Likes
- 224,291
Did you really just compare Keller Chryst, a career 55% completion guy in a conference that doesn’t play defense, while he played in the same backfield with perennial Heisman running backs, to Peyton Manning? Lol.I, personally, am a fan of playing the best player who provides the best opportunity to win. With that said, I was at Fan Day yesterday, I particularly watched the QBs. and came away with the following observations and opinions:
JQ: If you are a fan of a "gunslinger" then JG is your QB. When he threads the needle he looks good but when he tries to thread the needle in double/triple coverage he looks pathetic. In my opinion, he wants to rely too much on his strong arm than go through his progressions. Also, he still tends to throw behind the receiver. JQ kind of reminds me of Tyler Bray.
KC: If you are a fan of a "game manager" then KC is your QB. KC is quick to go through progressions and finding the open receiver. If each receiver is covered, he tucks the ball and runs. KC does not appear to be the type of QB who relies on arm strength to thread a needle but knowledge to find an open receiver. KC kind of reminds me of Peyton.
Personally, I think the biggest differences between JQ and KC is experience meaning KC will manage the game and produce positive yardage each play in a controlled manner versus trying to make a big play by throwing in tight coverage thus getting behind in down and distance which will cause having to throw in tight coverage again and again but when a pass is completed it should be for good yardage.
I am not a coach, but just a fan who wants to win, and I fully believe Coach Pruitt and Coach Helton will play the QB that gives the best opportunity to win.
64 harmony bobkat. Barn find at 60 bucks at a pawn shop in savannah, tn. The delicious, coveted, DeArmond pickups alone can go for $150 to $250 apiece. Thats for originals.
The guitar, once cheap and part of the sears silvertone series, is very much a cult classic guitar makers are now doing remakes of both the guitar and the pickups. I think it was around $60 msrp in 1964 it was like i entered a twilight zone time warp when i walked into that pawn shop. It was the only guitar they had.
They are very hard to find, mine was in rough shape. So i lovingly stripped it down and refinished it with a cherry orange sunburst.
64 harmony bobkat. Barn find at 60 bucks at a pawn shop in savannah, tn. The delicious, coveted, DeArmond pickups alone can go for $150 to $250 apiece. Thats for originals.
The guitar, once cheap and part of the sears silvertone series, is very much a cult classic guitar makers are now doing remakes of both the guitar and the pickups. I think it was around $60 msrp in 1964 it was like i entered a twilight zone time warp when i walked into that pawn shop. It was the only guitar they had.
They are very hard to find, mine was in rough shape. So i lovingly stripped it down and refinished it with a cherry orange sunburst.
I know this isn't popular... but the Pac12 isn't Pop Warner. They do actually have a few good players.... JG couldn't beat out a guy who now plays for a mid-major... and then only after he was playing hurt. Chryst lost his job to a guy making some pre-season Heisman lists. Longshot for sure... but if you are on a list in CFB with only about 25 other names on it... that's pretty good company. And to be perfectly honest, there are several back ups in top tier programs around the country who would be good candidates or even favorites to win UT's QB job.
I've seen speculation and it could be true. But there have been others with access who still think it is a battle.Solid argument sjt18 as usual, but he is already significantly behind the guy who couldn’t start ahead of Dormady last year (to borrow from your argument). What does that say about Chryst? Maybe he will catch up quick but most observers have put JG decisively ahead right now
Can we please add in the empirical fact that JG completed 61% of his passes last year in actual live game action? The number jumps to 65% (71-109) in SEC play. You don’t complete 65% of your passes in the SEC if you don’t understand when and how to take something off your passes when needed. So Ubben can chart all he wants and give his opinions, but JG has the added benefit of a more successful completion % under dire circumstances as a freshman/first year player last year. Then throw in Austin Price’s, John Brice’s and Erik Ainge’s comments about who they think leads and will ultimately be Tennessee’s starter come the WVa game....
Thanks Fingers et al for the great videos!
Based on the new scrimmage videos posted later today, if I had to pick a guy that looked pretty good so far at QB, it would be Shrout. He did throw a pick, but so did the other guys. Here are just a few things I noticed:
- He has a controlled leadership presence about him.
- His play action fakes were much better than the rest. The other guys were just just going through the motions.
- He was pretty accurate with all his passes.
- He appears to be more dialed in to executing the offense than the others....
Details win or lose games. Shrout definitely won this category today. Not crowning anyone King just yet, just liked what I saw from him today.
Nope. It isn't Shrout.
The early advantage is to JG. One of the key things to watch is who goes with the 1's first and who gets the most reps with them. That fact accurately predicted QD the starter last year.
Have you seen an actual up-to-date depth chart for quarterbacks? I'm sure that through the same number of practices that they had been through Ange and Schaefer would have been the bottom two guys in the year that they took over the jobIf the guy you'd pick is 3rd on our depth chart we are in big big trouble.
Of course he is. Everyone always thinks a QB who hasn’t played yet is the solution to a team’s problems. Shrout will not play this year barring a catastrophic injury situation to both Chryst and JG
Have you seen an actual up-to-date depth chart for quarterbacks? I'm sure that through the same number of practices that they had been through Ange and Schaefer would have been the bottom two guys in the year that they took over the job
Don't agree and especially if Pruitt is the straight shooter many profess him to be. JG didn't do anything to make himself the "de-facto" starter last fall. He struggled. He didn't win games. He showed immaturity. He didn't demonstrate a mastery of the head part of the game. He took sacks. And IMO he was largely protected by the playcalling and scheme.Plain old logic tells you who the starter is.
JG is the de-facto starter (until he sucks really bad on the field and/or gets injured)
Unless you have doubts about wanting JG to be a 3 year starter. If they want Shrout or Maurer or someone else to be "the future"... then why invest 3 years in JG?Chryst is the stop gap/insurance policy in case one of the above happens. You dont bring in a guy with 1 year of eligibility as a grad student to appoint him the starter.
IMO, they want a starter that they can give the keys to. No one has been named "the guy". It appears that JG is leading. They may announce him the starter tomorrow for all I know. But there are enough mixed reports to doubt anything like a lockdown... and they haven't even practiced in pads yet. When it starts being game speed, decisions start being the means of separation rather than throwing a pretty ball.The only way Chryst starts the WV game is if the staff sees a particular tendency of the WV defense that they think Chryst can better exploit. But JG is "the guy" until he proves otherwise on the field.
I think that most vehement guarantano fans form their opinion based on an evaluation that was done by some Brent Hubbs wannabe while he was still in high school. I certainly didn't see anything last year to indicate that he was any kind of a future starthe depth chart is as much about messaging as anything else.
If UT came out and said that 1) a grad transfer who can only play one year or 2) a true freshman was the choice for #1 QB, it would send up huge red flags about the state of the program.
JG is the guy until he isn't the guy. It's gonna have to come out on game day.
Don't agree and especially if Pruitt is the straight shooter many profess him to be. JG didn't do anything to make himself the "de-facto" starter last fall. He struggled. He didn't win games. He showed immaturity. He didn't demonstrate a mastery of the head part of the game. He took sacks. And IMO he was largely protected by the playcalling and scheme.
Unless you have doubts about wanting JG to be a 3 year starter. If they want Shrout or Maurer or someone else to be "the future"... then why invest 3 years in JG?
IMO, they want a starter that they can give the keys to. No one has been named "the guy". It appears that JG is leading. They may announce him the starter tomorrow for all I know. But there are enough mixed reports to doubt anything like a lockdown... and they haven't even practiced in pads yet. When it starts being game speed, decisions start being the means of separation rather than throwing a pretty ball.
I think that most vehement guarantano fans form their opinion based on an evaluation that was done by some Brent Hubbs wannabe while he was still in high school. I certainly didn't see anything last year to indicate that he was any kind of a future star
I would prefer with at least Dijon, maybe with some Wasabi addedYeah, I dont disagree. Dont take my words to mean that I support JG. I dont suppor ANY of them until I see them play. I'm simply laying out the optics of the situation and how I think they will play out. I personally think UT has ZERO great QBs right now and UT is trying to make a decision between eating a sh!t sandwhich and eating a sh!t sandwhich with mustard.
If the guy you'd pick is 3rd on our depth chart we are in big big trouble.
I've seen speculation and it could be true. But there have been others with access who still think it is a battle.
My point in that post though was primarily the Pac12 inferiority notion. I think many would argue that after the SEC's top 2... the teams become more comparable.