volfanhill
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2011
- Messages
- 37,208
- Likes
- 67,965
Watch the video again and pay close attention to the right side/hand of the victim. As the crazy dude brings the gun out, he blades ever so slightly to where his right side isnt visible to the crazy dude. If I am the guy on the ground, I see a man who has just assaulted me, I draw my weapon and he blades to me to where I cannot see his hands, I am shooting the guy as soon as he makes a move. The visibility of hands is the most important aspect of self defense. Hands are what hurt you. Hands hold weapons, either real, or imagined. If you cannot see his hands, you have no way of knowing. Compliance is key.
There is a lot of stupid to go around in this one. The lady parking the car where she shouldnt as well as the crazy dude playing Barney fife. The guy coming out and assaulting the man. This was a disastrous situation all the way around.
I generally agree and I try to live my life by the sticks and stones motto, however I am pointing out that others have indicated in previous topics their willingness to whoop some ass in order to teach a lesson to someone who was not necessarily being violent. That whole macho man attitude runs counter to the defense of the shooter that we are seeing now.
Again....getting pushed to the ground is not enough reason to justify you shooting someone. If your first instinct to getting punched or pushed is to shoot someone you are a timid snowflake.
Let me know what food you like, I'll give recommendations
Again....getting pushed to the ground is not enough reason to justify you shooting someone. If your first instinct to getting punched or pushed is to shoot someone you are a timid snowflake.
Especially IF the guy is standing over him, prior to pulling the gun, and saying that he is going to kill him.......he was attacked in a public place and out numbered.......we can all say that none of us would have pulled the trigger on a guy backing away, but the truth is, we do not know exactly what we would do and the emotions of the situation.....
We went to a baseball game a couple weeks ago and sat in general admission. We got there late but found some spaces. 15 minutes later this dude sits behind us and starts saying I guess I lost my seats, etc to the people beside him. Then he starts saying roll tide to my kid. I couldnt care less, my wife says were UT fans. Not helpful. Oh you guys shouldnt have stolen Pruitt, hell be back at Bama soon, etc. I just said ok. Then he says something else and I ignored him. Then he started that hey man Im trying to talk to you stuff. So my choice was engage this 50ish drunk who came alone to a baseball game and sprung $5 for the ticket or move. I picked move. Theres no upside for me.
This is very true. It's why I don't carry...he should never carry again either. Have to be able to self evaluate. I own guns, and don't hunt. I bought them specifically to kill someone should they break in my home, or harm my wife or children to the point that I am willing to lose my life in order to take theirs. I leave them at home, because I have a temper. Ride home to get a gun would be a mandatory cooling off period. We have to be smart enough to know how stupid we can be at times.
Here are some places I've visited:
CHEZ VINCENT
INFUSION TEA
Winter Park Fish Company
THE RAVENOUS PIG
I will try almost any type of food. Not too fond of Ethiopian.
Recommendations would be great. They do not all have to be upscale. I love locally owned rustic places also.
Thank you.
Because you can't suffer bodily harm by yelling at someone. It's been admitted that the shove could have killed him. That's the difference. The dude escalated it to it being physical.
But the shove didn't kill him, so that's totally irrelevant. The shove caused slightly more harm than the yelling. The shooting caused way more harm than the shove. One of them escalated more than the other. Can we agree on that?
Sure, that's the way it turned out. It's not irrelevant. It goes to whether the shooter was threatened. If you are threatened physically, your instinct is to protect yourself. But what if he'd shot him in the leg. The gun shot had the potential to be less deadly too. What if he'd just grazed him with the round? Both actions had the potential to be lethal. One turned out to be lethal. Exchanging of words had zero chance to be lethal. Can we agree on that? That guy that pushed the other guy made it physical. He's the one that crossed the line.