We are an entitled, petty, barbaric country: Handicapped parking shooting

#677
#677
k-town_king said:
COULD have killed him. He was fine though and the guy was walking away. Then shot him in cold blood. There was no threat when he pulled out his gun. And since you want to play hypothetical how do we know he didn't threaten her life so the victim pushed the murderer?
Click to expand...

How do you know he did. I've stated several times the audio would complete the puzzle. My problem with your stance is you're not open to other possibilities other than the guy killed him in cold blood. You nor I know that.

What if the guy had shot him in the leg and just wounded him? Would that be ok?
 
#678
#678
k-town_king said:
You are lying. He didn't run out there. He walked up so he could hear what was being said. When he realized the disrespect occurring he told the shooter to leave her alone. Then he pushed him and walked away. Then the guy shot him.
Click to expand...

Where did you get the audio? I'd love to hear it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#679
#679
k-town_king said:
You are lying. He didn't run out there. He walked up so he could hear what was being said. When he realized the disrespect occurring he told the shooter to leave her alone. Then he pushed him and walked away. Then the guy shot him.
Click to expand...

You are lying. I didn’t say run. I said straight. You make it so easy.

He didn’t listen to anything. You lie again.

“Disprespect” is no reason to violently shove a guy to the ground from the blind side like a *****.

The b**** got what he asked for. The shooter may pay the price but the dead guy went b**** and got what he asked for.

Didn’t you say you carry? You shouldn’t carry. You’re way too angry and delusional and irrational to make good decisions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#680
#680
InVOLuntary said:
How do you know he did. I've stated several times the audio would complete the puzzle. My problem with your stance is you're not open to other possibilities other than the guy killed him in cold blood. You nor I know that.

What if the guy had shot him in the leg and just wounded him? Would that be ok?
Click to expand...

InVOLuntary said:
Where did you get the audio? I'd love to hear it.
Click to expand...

Witness statements.

No it would not be right. It's not ok to shoot someone because they shoved you. If it was there would be thousands of kids getting shot in school or on the playground each day.

Why be open to other possibilities when it is in the video? He got pushed. Boo freaking whoo. Then he contemplates it and pulls his gun out to shoot a guy walking away.
 
#681
#681
I’d like to take this time to point out to everyone that K-town and I go back years and this is what I have to deal with every time we get in a thread. The dude is way out there.
 
#682
#682
tumscalcium said:
You are lying. I didn’t say run. I said straight. You make it so easy.

He didn’t listen to anything. You lie again.

“Disprespect” is no reason to violently shove a guy to the ground from the blind side like a *****.

The b**** got what he asked for. The shooter may pay the price but the dead guy went b**** and got what he asked for.

Didn’t you say you carry? You shouldn’t carry. You’re way too angry and delusional and irrational to make good decisions.
Click to expand...

I love how he makes up this scenario and then acuses others of making sh!t up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#683
#683
k-town_king said:
Witness statements.

No it would not be right. It's not ok to shoot someone because they shoved you. If it was there would be thousands of kids getting shot in school or on the playground each day.

Why be open to other possibilities when it is in the video? He got pushed. Boo freaking whoo. Then he contemplates it and pulls his gun out to shoot a guy walking away.
Click to expand...

How many seconds?
 
#684
#684
k-town_king said:
Witness statements.

No it would not be right. It's not ok to shoot someone because they shoved you. If it was there would be thousands of kids getting shot in school or on the playground each day.

Why be open to other possibilities when it is in the video? He got pushed. Boo freaking whoo. Then he contemplates it and pulls his gun out to shoot a guy walking away.
Click to expand...

But because he was in a verbal altercation with his wife it was ok for him to shove him, possibly killing him? Gotcha.
 
#685
#685
I just don't understand where getting pushed down means your life was in danger? Your a** may have been in danger of being whooped for letting your mouth overload your a**.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#686
#686
***RoadVol*** said:
I just don't understand where getting pushed down means your life was in danger? Your a** may have been in danger of being whooped for letting your mouth overload your a**.
Click to expand...

How unlikely might be debatable but people have absolutely died hitting their head on the pavement. Also, your life doesn't have to be in danger to use self defense. Bodily harm is enough to justify it.
 
#687
#687
tumscalcium said:
You are lying. I didn’t say run. I said straight. You make it so easy.

He didn’t listen to anything. You lie again.

“Disprespect” is no reason to violently shove a guy to the ground from the blind side like a *****.

The b**** got what he asked for. The shooter may pay the price but the dead guy went b**** and got what he asked for.

Didn’t you say you carry? You shouldn’t carry. You’re way too angry and delusional and irrational to make good decisions.
Click to expand...
Wow, the mother of all ironies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#690
#690
How many here would get into a fight with someone for burning a flag or publicly ****ting on soldiers or harassing their wife and young kids (Non-violent but surely aggravating)? I know some have said they would. There are countless examples of this tough talk about whooping folks' asses for non violent behavior. How many here would support the flag burner for shooting a patriot that shoved him in that scenario?

Deadly force should always be a citizens' right in the correct situation. Unfortunately when the situation doesn't call for it, the gun grabbers get more ammo. I do not think deadly force was justified here and it will be exaggerated by the far left to kingdom come. Irresponsible gun owners are responsible gun owners' worst enemies.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#691
#691
VolFaninFla said:
I go to Winter Park every 4-6 weeks. There is a restaurant on Lee Road called George's. I never pass up an opportunity to stop there for lunch.
The Alfond Inn is a great hotel there. I agree, the downtown area is beautiful.
Click to expand...

Let me know what food you like, I'll give recommendations
 
#692
#692
1972 Grad said:
Maybe he tried and the safety was on.
Click to expand...

Watched the video multiple times and if you follow the firearm movement it really looks like he sweeps her as the closest threat and then moves to his assaulter as she hustles around the back of the car. That seems to be the time lapse everyone is talking about.
 
#694
#694
MercyPercy said:
How many here would get into a fight with someone for burning a flag or publicly ****ting on soldiers or harassing their wife and young kids (Non-violent but surely aggravating)? I know some have said they would. There are countkess examples of this tough talk about whooping folks' asses for non violent behavior. How many here would support the flag burner for shooting a patriot that shoved him in that scenario?

Deadly force should always be a citizens' right in the correct situation. Unfortunately when the situation doesn't call for it, the gun grabbers get more ammo. I do not think deadly force was justified here and it will be exaggerated by the far left to kingdom come. Irresponsible gun owners are responsible gun owners' worst enemies.
Click to expand...

A lot of truth in this
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#695
#695
k-town_king said:
Yep. I always come with the truth.

Some punk thug wanna be cop murdered someone.

Attacks a woman and gets scared when a man shows up. Typical b++++ move.
Click to expand...
How did he "attack" the woman? Have you heard a recording that the rest of us haven't? I don't see a physical attack on the film.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#696
#696
InVOLuntary said:
How unlikely might be debatable but people have absolutely died hitting their head on the pavement. Also, your life doesn't have to be in danger to use self defense. Bodily harm is enough to justify it.
Click to expand...

I dont agree that bodily harm is the same or a reason to shoot someone UNLESS is was unprovoked. That was clearly not the case here. If the guy had hit his head and died the other guy would be in jail.
 
#698
#698
MercyPercy said:
How many here would get into a fight with someone for burning a flag or publicly ****ting on soldiers or harassing their wife and young kids (Non-violent but surely aggravating)? I know some have said they would. There are countless examples of this tough talk about whooping folks' asses for non violent behavior. How many here would support the flag burner for shooting a patriot that shoved him in that scenario?

Deadly force should always be a citizens' right in the correct situation. Unfortunately when the situation doesn't call for it, the gun grabbers get more ammo. I do not think deadly force was justified here and it will be exaggerated by the far left to kingdom come. Irresponsible gun owners are responsible gun owners' worst enemies.
Click to expand...

If words bring you to violence you must not have much going for you. I have too much stuff to fight some ******* over his mean words.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#700
#700
1972 Grad said:
How did he "attack" the woman? Have you heard a recording that the rest of us haven't? I don't see a physical attack on the film.
Click to expand...

The woman should have locked the doors and stayed in the car. Call the cops if it’s that big a threat. There was no need for her to get out. I doubt the dead guy shoves the dude of the woman isn’t standing there.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top