Special counsel Mueller charges 12 Russian intelligence officers with hacking Democra

#277
#277
SLICKYINC said:
This could be true or somebody popped off trying to help out a buddy that has already dug a hole so deep that he's now covering his own self up. Only to get called on it and now has become a mute.

BB, do your boy a solid and help him out.
Click to expand...

Did I miss something?
 
#279
#279
BowlBrother85 said:
Yes, but as the indictment also points out, July 27, 2016 was the first time that Russian hackers targeted Hillary Clinton's personal e-mail account. Coincidence? I think not.
Click to expand...

SLICKYINC said:
It said ON OR ABOUT July 27, 2016.


Whoop that horse rain man!
Click to expand...

volfanhill said:
In legal docs you always say “on or about”
Click to expand...

SLICKYINC said:
Why?

I know why, but I'm curious what you think.
Click to expand...

SLICKYINC said:
I'm still waiting on the lawyers to explain the use of On or About in legal terms and why the phrase is used.
Click to expand...


Did I miss something?
Click to expand...

You're all caught up now AV.
 
#280
#280
evillawyer said:
Doesn't Dershowitz have to assume that Mueller has nothing left to bring? Otherwise, I don't see how he can conclude a special counsel was not needed. And of course he's not privy to what Mueller has left in his cannon.
Click to expand...

It’s pretty clear he has nothing left to bring
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#281
#281
NorthDallas40 said:
Bravo Alan! Still pointing out to your party just how FOS they are over this whole damn ordeal!
Click to expand...

It's funny what a darling he is on Fox News right now. Will that still be the case in two years when he's endorsing Trump's opponent and donating money to the opponent? Fox will drop him like a hot potato.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#282
#282
evillawyer said:
Doesn't Dershowitz have to assume that Mueller has nothing left to bring? Otherwise, I don't see how he can conclude a special counsel was not needed. And of course he's not privy to what Mueller has left in his cannon.
Click to expand...

Mueller only has cob webs in his cannon. He’s shooting blanks, like you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#283
#283
evillawyer said:
Doesn't Dershowitz have to assume that Mueller has nothing left to bring? Otherwise, I don't see how he can conclude a special counsel was not needed. And of course he's not privy to what Mueller has left in his cannon.
Click to expand...

Yawn... nah. This is Muellers victory lap. bravo... *slow golf clap*
 
#287
#287
So just a couple of dumb questions. Has anybody actually seen a GRU org chart right down to worker bees before? And how could Mueller know what the GRU worker bees were doing if he didn't have a team of hackers doing what he's accusing the Russians of doing?

Then there's the other point that this took place on team Obama's watch, and O and all his three letter organizations organizations assured us that the Russians couldn't tamper with the election, and now the same three letter orgs are telling us specifically who within the Russian three letter spy agency was doing it ... and Trump is the complicit one? The swamp is getting really ripe; I'd recommend a respirator with air tanks if you go anywhere near Mueller's team.
 
Last edited:
#288
#288
evillawyer said:
Guess you've undertaken some recent up close and personal investigative work on how Mueller's cannon is functioning?
Click to expand...

Actually it’s easy to see, take off your pink blinders.

Tell us Evil, if you think he had anything on Trump don’t you think it wouldn’t take almost 2 years to let us know? He’s looking in the wrong places and he knows it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#289
#289
evillawyer said:
Doesn't Dershowitz have to assume that Mueller has nothing left to bring? Otherwise, I don't see how he can conclude a special counsel was not needed. And of course he's not privy to what Mueller has left in his cannon.
Click to expand...

Hint.... One does not indict someone who is fully expected to never be arrested to gain more information. Jesus, do you even lawyer?

Also, why blow your wad with these indictments? Its almost impotent.
 
#290
#290
BowlBrother85 said:
"I'll use what-about-ism when I have nothing else."
Click to expand...

I'm sorry, but do you realize how dumb you look spouting this over and over? You keep making quantitative statements about Trump being the "worst ever" so you yourself are inviting comparison. When people indulge, you scream "whataboutism!", a tactic you yourself use when it suits you. You talk about moral outrage, but where were those morals when Democrats were breaking and bending rules? True moral outrage spans partisanship and results in you condemning the actions no matter who commits them. Allowing your partisanship to interfere turns you into a hypocrite.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#291
#291
AirVol said:
Actually it’s easy to see, take off your pink blinders.

Tell us Evil, if you think he had anything on Trump don’t you think it wouldn’t take almost 2 years to let us know? He’s looking in the wrong places and he knows it.
Click to expand...

Don't think he's done with the indictments.
 
#292
#292
tim said:
Hint.... One does not indict someone who is fully expected to never be arrested to gain more information. Jesus, do you even lawyer?

Also, why blow your wad with these indictments? Its almost impotent.
Click to expand...

Not following you there Cardozo.
 
#294
#294
Earlier today, Trump said that we would have a really good relationship with Russia if it wasn't for the Mueller investigation. Think about that for a minute. He just said that we would have a really good relationship with a country who meddled in our most recent Presidential election if we weren't trying to hold the individuals responsible for the meddling, accountable for it. Nowhere in Trump's statements today did he say that we would have a better relationship with Russia if they hadn't meddled in the 2016 Presidential election to begin with.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#295
#295
BowlBrother85 said:
Earlier today, Trump said that we would have a really good relationship with Russia if it wasn't for the Mueller investigation. Think about that for a minute. He just said that we would have a really good relationship with a country who meddled in our most recent Presidential election if we weren't trying to hold the individuals responsible for the meddling, accountable for it. Nowhere in Trump's statements today did he say that we would have a better relationship with Russia if they hadn't meddled in the 2016 Presidential election to begin with.
Click to expand...

$$
 

Attachments

  • 50D3709F-8E76-4C77-A6BE-E0967570BB09.jpeg
    50D3709F-8E76-4C77-A6BE-E0967570BB09.jpeg
    65.4 KB · Views: 1
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top