Special counsel Mueller charges 12 Russian intelligence officers with hacking Democra

#201
#201
BowlBrother85 said:
Our intelligence agencies and justice department investigators have proven guilt of Russia's involvement in the interference which occurred during the 2016 Presidential campaign as much as it can be proven. It's not like this can end up in an American courtroom.

And why is having a positive relationship with Russia such a bad thing? It's not a possible thing as long as they are trying to sow discord and distrust in our democratic process. They have no business meddling in our elections but the absolutely did and Trump has shown no desire to hold them accountable for that.

This should all be common sense but because of the tribal atmosphere which currently exists in this country, some people really would just like to pretend that this Russian meddling didn't happen. Not because they like Russia but because it forces them to face some very uncomfortable truths about Donald Trump.
Click to expand...

Then why did the ignorant bloody bastards just indict 12 more of them today!?

Still waiting on that page and paragraph... other than paragraph 22 which I posted and shows absolutely nothing about July 27 2016 relevant to Trump.
 
#202
#202
NorthDallas40 said:
Then why did the ignorant bloody bastards just indict 12 more of them today!?

Still waiting on that page and paragraph... other than paragraph 22 which I posted and shows absolutely nothing about July 27, 2016 relevant to Trump.
Click to expand...

These indictments were about holding those responsible for the meddling publicly accountable, which Donald Trump refuses to do.

And we know what July 27, 2016 represents. Not everyone needs it spelled out for them like yourself. The Mueller indictment mentioned that specific date; not out of the blue but because that was the day that Trump called for Russian hacking of Clinton e-mails and they did it! The time of day was even referenced (after hours) as an obvious sign of what was being suggested! His speech was in the morning - the hacking was done later that day in response to his speech. Quit playing dumb.
 
Last edited:
#203
#203
luthervol said:
I've got nine days. The next major point on my timeline will be the conclusion of the Mueller investigation and the release of the findings.

A second Trump term has a 0,2% probability of happening.
Click to expand...

Kind of like that Hillary landslide victory?

:eek:lol::eek:lol::eek:lol::eek:lol::eek:lol::eek:lol:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#204
#204
UT_VOLS13 said:
Why didn't the previous administration do something about the Russian meddling?
Click to expand...

That is fair and well deserved criticism of the Obama administration. They dropped the ball by assuming that Clinton would win anyway.

Unlike any conservative is able to do on here with Trump, I can and often do criticize Obama. He dropped the ball several times during his Presidency. This was one of them.
 
#205
#205
BowlBrother85 said:
These indictments were about holding those responsible for the meddling publicly accountable, which Donald Trump refuses to do.

And we know what July 26, 2017 represents. Not everyone needs it spelled out for them like yourself. The Mueller indictment mentioned that specific date; not out of the blue but because that was the day that Trump called for Russian hacking of Clinton e-mails and they did it! The time of day was even referenced (after hours) as an obvious sign of what was being suggested! His speech was in the morning - the hacking was done later that day in response to his speech. Quit playing dumb.
Click to expand...

In or around. Learn to read.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#207
#207
BowlBrother85 said:
These indictments were about holding those responsible for the meddling publicly accountable, which Donald Trump refuses to do.

And we know what July 26, 2017 represents. Not everyone needs it spelled out for them like yourself. The Mueller indictment mentioned that specific date; not out of the blue but because that was the day that Trump called for Russian hacking of Clinton e-mails and they did it! The time of day was even referenced (after hours) as an obvious sign of what was being suggested! His speech was in the morning - the hacking was done later that day in response to his speech. Quit playing dumb.
Click to expand...

You are absolutely full of it. Here is the paragraph.

22. The Conspirators spearfished individuals affiliated with the Clinton Campaign throughout the summer of 2016. For example, on or about July 27, 2016, the Conspirators attempted after hours to spearfish for the first time email accounts at a domain hosted by a third-party provider and used by Clinton's personal office. At or around the same time, they also targeted seventy-six email addresses at the domain for the Clinton Campaign.
Click to expand...

You are absolutely correct about the importance of the reference to July 27 though. That is the paragraph that specifically references Clinton’s email server which was illegal for use for government business. Sadly I guess I have to spell this out for someone like yourself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#208
#208
So Trump tells Russia in a campaign speech to hack Hillary on national TV and they do it in a matter of hours because Trump told them to. But the FBI and all the others couldn't find them in years of looking.

Yea that's believable, I've got some ocean front property in Nashville I need to sell a lot of you.

We all know the Russians owned Hillary, untold millions they've given her and would have controlled her in the White House. She helped them greatly as SOS, uranium one deal, etc. So why would they want her defeated? Trump owes no one anything. He has an America first agenda...noted by the media all the time like it's a bad thing.

I think this is all a cover up by Mueller and the deep state.

First, the day Trump tells Russia to find the emails, they claim the Russians do just that.

Second, 3 days before Trump and Putin are scheduled to meet this big indictment comes out to undermine the meeting.

This Witch hunt is so obvious and they are not worried about making it somewhat credible. They know half the country(dems) will blindly and dumbly follow them and believe every word.

Trump has shown that the government is vastly more corrupt than I could have ever imagined it was. I never imagined the swamp ran this deep and wide.



Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 people
#209
#209
From the indictment:
The conspirators spearphished individuals affiliated with the Clinton campaign through the summer of 2016. For example, on or about July 27, 2016, the conspirators attempted after hours to spearphish for the first time email accounts at a domain hosted by a third-party provider and used by Clinton’s personal office. At or around the same time, they also targeted seventy-six email addresses at the domain for the Clinton campaign.
Click to expand...

What you loons dont realize is that Russia was hammering them MONTHS before. The indictment mentions a specific date as an example literally just to get yall frothing at the mouth. Well, mission accomplished Mueller! Trolled the libs yet again.
 
#210
#210
Its almost like anti Trump news is like sea monkeys to Liberals. They get it and are amazed then it just dies off into nothingness and they realize they were just tiny shrimps...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#211
#211
FLVOL_79 said:
From the indictment:


What you loons dont realize is that Russia was hammering them MONTHS before. The indictment mentions a specific date as an example literally just to get yall frothing at the mouth. Well, mission accomplished Mueller! Trolled the libs yet again.
Click to expand...

Yes, but as the indictment also points out, July 27, 2016 was the first time that Russian hackers targeted Hillary Clinton's personal e-mail account. Coincidence? I think not.
 
#212
#212
BowlBrother85 said:
Yes, but as the indictment also points out, July 27, 2016 was the first time that Russian hackers targeted Hillary Clinton's personal e-mail account. Coincidence? I think not.
Click to expand...

So, wait...

Trump has control over the Russian Intel agencies? I thought they had control over him?
 
Last edited:
#214
#214
Grand Vol said:
So, wait...

Trump has control over three Russian Intel agencies? I thought they had control over him?
Click to expand...

I didn't say he had control over Russian Intel agencies. Russian Intel agencies were damn sure trying to help him win though, (I think this is so they could exercise leverage over him while he was President), you can believe what you wish. However, the Russians had a clear preference for Trump as President and resorted to some extreme measures to help him reach that end.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#215
#215
BowlBrother85 said:
I didn't say they had control over Russian Intel agencies. Russian Intel agencies were damn sure trying to help him win though, (I think this is so they could exercise leverage over him while he was President), you can believe what you wish. However, the Russians had a clear preference for Trump as President and resorted to some extreme measures to help him reach that end.
Click to expand...
I am honestly worried that people think like this
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#217
#217
BowlBrother85 said:
I didn't say he had control over Russian Intel agencies. Russian Intel agencies were damn sure trying to help him win though, (I think this is so they could exercise leverage over him while he was President), you can believe what you wish. However, the Russians had a clear preference for Trump as President and resorted to some extreme measures to help him reach that end.
Click to expand...

You know who else had a clear preference for Trump?

The States with 304 electoral votes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#218
#218
BearCat204 said:
I am honestly worried that people think like this
Click to expand...

This is the old condescending remark which disputes something but is completely void of substance in the process. You want people to believe you are intellectually superior without actually saying anything of substance as a rebuttal. Weak.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#219
#219
evillawyer said:
Not claiming that at all. Just that the timing of the Trump Tower meeting, the promise of dirt on Hillary, Donny's open desire to get that dirt, and then the launching of DC Leaks website should be looked into. Maybe a coincidence, but something that should be ferreted out.
Click to expand...

Agreed
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#222
#222
BowlBrother85 said:
This is the old condescending remark which disputes something but is completely void of substance in the process. You want people to believe you are intellectually superior without actually saying anything of substance as a rebuttal. Weak.
Click to expand...

You think your babble of ridiculous reaches is anything close to containing substance? It's so far out there for anyone who isn't hell-bent on finding anything possible as a negative about a man. There's nothing there, yet you managed to make something of it.
 
#223
#223
FLVOL_79 said:
Its almost like anti Trump news is like sea monkeys to Liberals. They get it and are amazed then it just dies off into nothingness and they realize they were just tiny shrimps...
Click to expand...

Lol. I think we are really close in age, you were born in 79 right? I'm a year or 2 older depending on what month. You are good at getting these loons all riled up. Lmao
 
#225
#225
BowlBrother85 said:
Yes, but as the indictment also points out, July 27, 2016 was the first time that Russian hackers targeted Hillary Clinton's personal e-mail account. Coincidence? I think not.
Click to expand...

From the article

The indictment says the spearfishing attack on Clinton's personal office started for the first time on or about July, 27, 2016.

On OR about? Seems very indecisive to me. I mean this investigation was able to determine details like using crypto but it couldnt lock down a date?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top