luthervol
rational (x) and reasonable (y)
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2016
- Messages
- 48,505
- Likes
- 20,975
Have you heard anyone on here argue the cops weren't completely justified in taking that turd's weapons up to or even more than a year prior to the incident?
Furthermore, do you really support such idiotic knee jerk reactions in the aftermath?
What did this kid do wrong? What illegal act did he commit? Do you support the school questioning him without having his parents present?
The schools don't patrol social media, they hear about it from other students and parents. Schools get multiple calls a day from parents and students about things posted on social media.
and apparently the cops didn't go to the source media before talking to the kid to see if there was an issue. they immediately pull him and treat him in an unfriendly manner. again 3 to 1 is too much. I find their actions much more threatening than any post on a media site.
if it was 1 guy, this is a non issue in my book. if the parents were there, non issue. if it was just a check in instead of an interrogation, non issue. the adults screwed the pooch on this.
The schools don't patrol social media, they hear about it from other students and parents. Schools get multiple calls a day from parents and students about things posted on social media.
Had they treated the kid who shot up the school this way a few months ago, we'd all be thrilled.
I said they may have over reacted. We do not know the kid's past.
Do you condone a student making a political statement about the 2A? You do this time right? Besides the cops were completely justified in following up on an issue that was seen as threatening by other students. Determining if it was or wasn't is their job.
Not that you would know anything about it.
Do you condone a student making a political statement about the 2A? You do this time right? Besides the cops were completely justified in following up on an issue that was seen as threatening by other students. Determining if it was or wasn't is their job.
Not that you would know anything about it.
So now you're doubling down on being wrong by making an assertion of knowing how common something is that you didn't know was happening at all?
