there's ?'s pretty much everywhere on the roster, sure. but i think if the OL were in better shape, most everyone's opinion of the roster as a whole would be better than it is today.
No doubt there are questions at all positions but the biggest difference in this roster and other years where we have been undermanned is in every single position there are highly recruited talented players that if they step up we are fine. That hasn't been the case before.
The roster doesn't worry me at all. The transition to a new scheme and a lockeroom that lacks confidence worries me much more
