#BoycottNRA

Nope. Nobody should have the right to prevent you from defending yourself. The parent has a choice to NOT send their kid to that school.

Try visiting the state capital, or better yet, the White House, and refuse to give up your gun. Good luck.


Plus: I guess the teacher has the right to not work at a place where they can not carry a weapon.
 
How would that work? Stop and frisk? Nope. Liberals call racism. Go into residences without a warrant ? Racist. You can’t have it both ways.

Stop and frisk is a precursor to requesting papers and illegal detainment. Search and seizure without a warrant would spell the death of liberty in America.

It is not a race thing.
 
Ummmm (more m's than you had, which indicates I am more perplexed with your response than are you with mine) yes, serious.

Not sure how you can type that with a straight face.

If those firearms in Chicago are already being sold or obtained illegally, hence your "illegal" designation, it's this a paradox?

"Making guns illegal will reduce illegal guns."

Sounds pretty stupid when I say it that way, no?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
I'm thinking that the students in the classroom also have rights. I think the parents of those students have the obligation to protect the rights of their children.

And I would bet the teacher of those children would agree. Funny thing though they are rights not conveniences.

I respect the premise of burning the American flag as an expression of free speech and believe it should be left alone

I also know I might, MIGHT, get myself in a lot of trouble if it happens in front of men but I’ll own my actions regardless.
 
Stop and frisk is a precursor to requesting papers and illegal detainment. Search and seizure without a warrant would spell the death of liberty in America.

It is not a race thing.

Point being, how do you think we’re getting guns out of the hands of people who shouldn’t have them? This is not a simple solution.
 
Not sure how you can type that with a straight face.

If those firearms in Chicago are already being sold or obtained illegally, hence your "illegal" designation, it's this a paradox?

"Making guns illegal will reduce illegal guns."

Sounds pretty stupid when I say it that way, no?

Didn't we just establish that they were being sold/purchased through the "legal" loophole at gun shows?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
And I would bet the teacher of those children would agree. Funny thing though they are rights not conveniences.

I respect the premise of burning the American flag as an expression of free speech and believe it should be left alone

I also know I might, MIGHT, get myself in a lot of trouble if it happens in front of men but I’ll own my actions regardless.

Not sure how this applies.

But I agree on the flag burning.
 
Try visiting the state capital, or better yet, the White House, and refuse to give up your gun. Good luck.


Plus: I guess the teacher has the right to not work at a place where they can not carry a weapon.

All true.
 
Stop and frisk is a precursor to requesting papers and illegal detainment. Search and seizure without a warrant would spell the death of liberty in America.

It is not a race thing.

I'm with you on stop and frisk. In no way should that be legal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Not sure how this applies.

But I agree on the flag burning.

It’s called an example.

My distaste for disrespecting the American flag does not give me the right to violate another individuals right of free speech for my convenience. It’s in a document somewhere....🤔
 
They become "illegal" when sold by the gun show purchaser to the Chicago drug dealer.

So, legally purchased, then illegally sold. Which makes them...illegal weapons.

Still unsure of where you are trying to go with this. Additionally, I did offer to give your side universal background checks with conditions and trades. You decided to decline.
 
Research the origin of illegal guns confiscated in Chicago and then play with your own dum-dum.

Seeing as you have to have an FOID to buy a gun in Illinois, how do they circumvent the law at a gunshow? Or do the Latin Kings keep a guy on the payroll with a clean record and a bad habit of leaving guns in trap houses?
 
The students rights do not trump the teachers.

The teacher's rights do not trump society's.

How can you justify being forced to give up your gun in order to enter the state capital, or the White House?
 
They become "illegal" when sold by the gun show purchaser to the Chicago drug dealer.

It’s an escalation to use a firearm in commission of a crime almost across the board right? Or is that already universal or in US code? Even a legally purchased one? Man those criminals are dumb.
 
Seeing as you have to have an FOID to buy a gun in Illinois, how do they circumvent the law at a gunshow? Or do the Latin Kings keep a guy on the payroll with a clean record and a bad habit of leaving guns in trap houses?

Most guns confiscated in Chicago do not originate in Illinois. (I think, someone double check)
 
The teacher's rights do not trump society's.

How can you justify being forced to give up your gun in order to enter the state capital, or the White House?

Society doesn’t have rights individuals do. Yes yes I know people form a group group forms a blah blah. It’s still wrong in statement.
 
Most guns confiscated in Chicago do not originate in Illinois. (I think, someone double check)

That's kinda the point we are trying to make.

Legally purchased elsewhere, sold illegally in Illinois. Not sure where the disconnect is here?
 
Advertisement





Back
Top