Magic8Vol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2012
- Messages
- 1,513
- Likes
- 856
Lol, I'm glad Im not snorting whatever you are that makes you obsessed with with this stupit chit.
Exactly what Ive been saying. This fiasco is a serious black eye on the university and administration whether we want to believe it or not. I sent emails and signed the petitions too but Im looking at this without my orange shades on and the national perception of this is an unprecedented revolt by fans that didnt agree with a hire. Do any of you think any other decent coach is gonna take that same risk? This set us back years, maybe decades, or quite possibly killed this program. Fans did the right thing but this is not gonna end well.
UTVolinExile liked this, it was kind of late in the previous thread this morning, so I thought I would post it again for those who didn't see it.
My guess (condensed version), based on info here, at what happened:
A group of boosters wanted Jon Gruden as coach. The Haslems, Currie and Davenport feigned support of the initiative. The booster group proceed to gauge Gruden's interest and what it would take to get him to UT. They came to general agreement over three weeks ago and even celebrated the agreement on Thursday in Dunwoody, GA two weeks ago. While legal matters were being worked out, the Haslems, Currie and Davenport were pursuing their own agenda to maintain complete control of UT athletics. The Haslems, thinking they alone know what is best for UT, were enamored with Schiano when he previously interviewed for the Browns coaching job(this was before the release of the previously sealed testimony of the Sandusky case implicating Schiano, thus the lack of due diligence on Schiano, because they had already vetted him). They thought he was a better fit for UT than Gruden. They knew they couldn't sell Schiano to the other boosters, so they kept Currie and Davenport on a short leash and thought they could have the deal done before the other boosters could do anything about it. Once announced, the other boosters would be obliged to support their new coach. It would have worked except a member of the AD staff leaked the deal to other boosters and they mobilized the support of the UT BOT and legislators and Currie was forced to back down--for the time being.
Now you know what kind of person Haslam is.
UTVolinExile liked this, it was kind of late in the previous thread this morning, so I thought I would post it again for those who didn't see it.
My guess (condensed version), based on info here, at what happened:
A group of boosters wanted Jon Gruden as coach. The Haslems, Currie and Davenport feigned support of the initiative. The booster group proceed to gauge Gruden's interest and what it would take to get him to UT. They came to general agreement over three weeks ago and even celebrated the agreement on Thursday in Dunwoody, GA two weeks ago. While legal matters were being worked out, the Haslems, Currie and Davenport were pursuing their own agenda to maintain complete control of UT athletics. The Haslems, thinking they alone know what is best for UT, were enamored with Schiano when he previously interviewed for the Browns coaching job(this was before the release of the previously sealed testimony of the Sandusky case implicating Schiano, thus the lack of due diligence on Schiano, because they had already vetted him). They thought he was a better fit for UT than Gruden. They knew they couldn't sell Schiano to the other boosters, so they kept Currie and Davenport on a short leash and thought they could have the deal done before the other boosters could do anything about it. Once announced, the other boosters would be obliged to support their new coach. It would have worked except a member of the AD staff leaked the deal to other boosters and they mobilized the support of the UT BOT and legislators and Currie was forced to back down--for the time being.
You know, it's not just the Penn State thing.
The man is not a good coach. Has the idiot media even stopped to think that perhaps it's a combination of completely undesirable traits that had Volnation in an uproar?
Again, why aren't they whining about UF passing him over? Why isn't be being mentioned in the ATM job opening? Arizona State? Moo State?
We were looking at Butch 2.0 with him at the helm.
I am not saying that Schiano was a good hire. I don't at all. You can't touch a person who was involved with PSU during those years and not think it will come up. What I am saying is that we have unfortunately created a narrative that the reason we said "NO" to the hire is that we are morally upright...when in truth the main reason we were all angry is that the hire was horrible for a variety of reasons.
D. Mcnabb on ESPN radio said after this debacle UT is last on the list of all open jobs. Thats why people are saying Tee. Because he might actually say yes. The big splash hires arent gonna happen now. JMO.
at this point we may actually be desperate, again. I agree with your buyout option
Obsessed with reality?? I am guilty of that. Im so sick of seeing the Gruden name for 5 years straight. Not happening. Lets focus our energy at an attainable coach and try to crawl out of this orange and white landfill.
come on now. This isn't SMU, or Penn State. If those programs can survive UT isn't dying because a fanbase stood up.
Bull. This whole thing that went down with Schiano had absolutely nothing to do with his past. The truth is that Tennessee fans didn't want him because we felt as though he was not a good enough of a coach to coach Tennessee. And that is probably true. That is why fans revolted. We were angry because it wasn't Gruden, Petersen, Patterson, etc. I have no problem saying, "We don't think GS is good enough of a coach for Tennessee," but to make all of this about an issue that you and I have absolutely no clue about and every court/lawyer/person involved has given passing remarks to GS in regards to this issue is shameful. Let's not make ourselves out to be heroes on some moral high ground when all it really was was that we wanted a better coach.