The fact that he couldn't understand that he'd lost some portion of the fanbase merely for not firing Butch quickly enough or that he couldn't forsee a huge backlash to a guy with (admittedly loose and questionably accurate) ties to the Sandusky tragedy coming off Butch Jones and a Title IX investigation is borderline malpractice.
Agreed. Curries plan to hire Schiano is an example of a specific kind of myopia seen among management consultants, performance coaches, and executive search firms obsession with things that look great on paper.
On paper, Schiano has the three most important things the Tennessee AD was looking for in a head coach:
1) Proven record building a winning program Rutgers was a worse job than Vandy or Purdue and he made them respectable (went something like 1-21 in the two years prior to his arrival);
2) Proven expertise on one side of the ball, regardless of one game duds OSU has been in the top 25 or so on defense in both of his years and apparently hes respected in the NFL for his defensive chops; and,
3) Proven elite Recruiting he pulled numerous guys from Florida at Rutgers and he kept most of the NJ guys home. Oh, and hes the #2 recruiter on 247 for 2017.
The problem with all that, of course, is that hes Butch 2: To Tha Extreme, even if we set aside the unproven Sandusky/Penn State allegations**. No one associated with Tennessee football wants another coach with control issues (Schiano allegedly filmed his players on the sideline to review their demeanor), injury and training room concerns (MRSA outbreak that players and trainers blamed him for), and a penchant for out-of-touch rah-rah soundbites.
If Schiano is the hire in 2013 instead of Jones, maybe the Vols are in a better place right now recruiting is probably similar or better, in-game coaching couldnt be worse, and maybe the defense is decent but no one wants a Butch retread, even if hes Super Butch.
**Sidenote: everyone involved in the Penn State mess has incentive to claim they knew nothing and Sandusky was a master manipulator. Who would you trust: the guy who came forward and had his reputation tarnished, or the guys who have legal liability and professional interest in claiming ignorance?