Yeah...I doubt YOU could.
UT Football is NOT the Army, or the country, or the Constitution. But let's lay it out your way. I'm loyal to a fault to my University, and again to the players for the sacrifices they made. When a General in the Army employs poor strategy, shows poor judgement, fails to engender discipline etc....morale of the troops suffers. If this happens long enough, that General is demoted, or removed from his position, or forced into retirement. There is no mention of loyalty, or how the troops should be loyal to him indefinitely.
Back to real world definitions...."the state or quality of being loyal; faithfulness to commitments or obligations."
That sums it up, whether your miopic view allows you to admit it, and it's exactly what I said.
Thanks for your service.
So in your version of "loyalty", we throw tomatoes at our generals throughout the war if they don't do things the way we'd like them to...don't use the right words in speeches, don't win every battle. [Patton didn't win every battle; Ike didn't; MacArthur and Nimitz and Halsey, none of them did either]
If a military leader breaks the law, or acts immorally or unethically, every American should stand up and demand he be fired.
But if he's in the middle of the fight, doing it "the right way," and has more success than not, we Americans ought to have his back. Ought to understand things don't always go our way. Even ought to understand that the general isn't paid for his public speaking prowess, so he might say something that makes you scratch your head from time to time.
As long as he's doing it the right way and generally winning the war, we ought to back him (or her). Right? That's the citizen-to-military element of loyalty.
And then our loyalty to the troops is like our loyalty to the players. Add that on top of our loyalty to our leaders.
But in your view, that general or admiral is making the big bucks, he's a mercenary because he could always go work for General Dynamics or Pratt & Whitney instead. So we owe him no loyalty. We're free to throw tomatoes at him all day long, for any little mistake he makes. Right?
And, by the way, let's throw tomatoes at the troops, too (you know, Guarantano, Jumper, etc.) because they looked sullen in formation or weren't as fast as we wanted them to be.
That's the state of "loyalty" in big parts of this fan forum today.
That's what it would look like translated to our military.
You still favor your version of "loyalty"?