To Protect and to Serve II

#3,601
#3,601
DEFENDTHISHOUSE said:
Then let's legalize drugs and get rid of most of the non-violent drug offenders in our prisons to make room for the truly violent that walk among us.
Click to expand...

Most violent crime has drug abuse as an underlying cause. Most of the people in jail with drug charges are not there soley because on drug charges but because of actions, many violent because of addiction. Many committing crimes to support their habit. The idea that legalizing all these heavily addictive drugs is somehow going to solve our problems is wrong imo. I've been a victim of it several times. I've employed them.
 
#3,602
#3,602
InVOLuntary said:
Most violent crime has drug abuse as an underlying cause. Most of the people in jail with drug charges are not there soley because on drug charges but because of actions, many violent because of addiction. Many committing crimes to support their habit. The idea that legalizing all these heavily addictive drugs is somehow going to solve our problems is wrong imo. I've been a victim of it several times. I've employed them.
Click to expand...

https://www.bop.gov/about/statistics/statistics_inmate_offenses.jsp

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/4914884
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#3,603
#3,603
tim said:
And hurts the murderous cartels more than a few hundred pounds of weed or kilos of coke. To be fair they work both sides
Click to expand...

No. It's essentially the same damage. If you get the coke, they don't get the money and you prevented drug consumption (if that is the actual goal of the WoD).
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#3,604
#3,604
#3,605
#3,605
DEFENDTHISHOUSE said:
Question. If all drugs are legalized, why would someone buy something from some guy in a double wide trailer that is untested and potentially dangerous, when they can go to a dispensary and get something that is much safer? I don't think ole boy in the trailer will find much of a market. Of course he will sell a few, so what.
Click to expand...

So how does that work out with moonshine?

And to answer your question: cheaper, more accessible, under age, different buzz, rebellion, etc.....
 
#3,606
#3,606
n_huffhines said:
No. It's essentially the same damage. If you get the coke, they don't get the money and you prevented drug consumption (if that is the actual goal of the WoD).
Click to expand...

The original stated goal of the drug war was to prevent cocaine from causing black men to rape white women in the south and opium was outlawed to prevent single women from cohabiting with Chinese men.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#3,608
#3,608
InVOLuntary said:
You can't go by those statistics. Many of the charges are changed or dropped. One of the guys that robbed me had a previous charge on his record f vandalism. Thought that as odd so I looked into it further. He was actually breaking into an atm machine. Ask any cop. Most of the crimes that are committed having underlying drug addiction issues.
Click to expand...

Perhaps if drugs were legalized, addiction could actually be treated as the medical condition it is. Maybe insurance companies would even cover treatment as part of your policy if there was a market demand for it. Who knows, we first have to take that step.

Crime will happen regardless if drugs are legal or not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#3,609
#3,609
luthervol said:
So how does that work out with moonshine?

And to answer your question: cheaper, more accessible, under age, different buzz, rebellion, etc.....
Click to expand...

Moonshine is so minuscule the figures don't even matter.

If someone takes a dangerous drug that ends up killing them when there are safer alternatives, well, that's simply cleaning up the gene pool.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#3,610
#3,610
DEFENDTHISHOUSE said:
Perhaps if drugs were legalized, addiction could actually be treated as the medical condition it is. Maybe insurance companies would even cover treatment as part of your policy if there was a market demand for it. Who knows, we first have to take that step.

Crime will happen regardless if drugs are legal or not.
Click to expand...

Who's going to pay for the drug treatment? Again, for the most part heroin, meth users can't pay for their drugs and can't even fend for themselves.
 
#3,611
#3,611
InVOLuntary said:
Who's going to pay for the drug treatment? Again, for the most part heroin, meth users can't pay for their drugs and can't even fend for themselves.
Click to expand...

The taxpayer as per usual. Isn't that the usual answer?

If they can't pay for their drugs, how are they still addicted? If they commit a violent crime, they should be locked up, period. They shouldn't be locked up for simple possession.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#3,612
#3,612
DEFENDTHISHOUSE said:
The taxpayer as per usual. Isn't that the usual answer?

If they can't pay for their drugs, how are they still addicted? If they commit a violent crime, they should be locked up, period. They shouldn't be locked up for simple possession.
Click to expand...

You are a second amendment guy like myself, I believe. So do you believe that with the right to keep and bear arms there is a level of responsibility that comes with that?
 
#3,614
#3,614
DEFENDTHISHOUSE said:
Sure.
Click to expand...

I look at drugs the same way. If you can't pay your own way you shouldn't do it. If you can't be responsible for your actions where other do not have to foot the bill, you shouldn't do it, and that includes tax payer dollars. I don't have a problem with legalization of weed because many weed users can work, pay taxes, buy their own weed, pay for there health insurance etc. They can be responsible. My contention is that users meth, heroin, morphine, crack and other hard drugs can't for the most part be responsible drug users. They'll rely on society to take care of them as long as they use.
 
#3,615
#3,615
InVOLuntary said:
I look at drugs the same way. If you can't pay your own way you shouldn't do it. If you can't be responsible for your actions where other do not have to foot the bill, you shouldn't do it, and that includes tax payer dollars. I don't have a problem with legalization of weed because many weed users can work, pay taxes, buy their own weed, pay for there health insurance etc. They can be responsible. My contention is that users meth, heroin, morphine, crack and other hard drugs can't for the most part be responsible drug users. They'll rely on society to take care of them as long as they use.
Click to expand...

I have no real disagreement with anything you posted. However, I am of the opinion that forced taxpayer funded anything is the very definition of theft.
 
#3,622
#3,622
InVOLuntary said:
A military then consisted of a guy and a gun. Totally different today.
Click to expand...

Market forces are no different now than in 1913. If there is a market for something, some enterprising person will build it and the people will pay to use it because it makes their lives better. We don't need to be stolen from by a group of criminals calling themselves government to do it. Besides, it's the gas tax that pays for the roads, not the income tax.
 
#3,624
#3,624
midnight orange said:
What percentage of alcohol sold in the US is moonshine?
Click to expand...

Minuscule, but it's all basically alcohol.

I just heard today that 4 out of 5 opioid addicts started with doctor subscribed drugs. Last year doctors subscribed enough opioids to treat every single adult in the US for 3 weeks. I think they also said that most heroin addicts started with doctor subscribed opioids.

Do you think opioids should be available for purchase by any adult without a doctor's prescription?
 
#3,625
#3,625
DEFENDTHISHOUSE said:
Market forces are no different now than in 1913. If there is a market for something, some enterprising person will build it and the people will pay to use it because it makes their lives better. We don't need to be stolen from by a group of criminals calling themselves government to do it. Besides, it's the gas tax that pays for the roads, not the income tax.
Click to expand...

So you're just against income tax?

So you're saying we don't need a military? Or the military should be privatized?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top