smokey0625
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2012
- Messages
- 3,850
- Likes
- 2,205
I just don't see it.
Blowout losses to Vanderbilt and Alabama. 3 in a row for Bama.
Bad secondary play. We lose our best cover guy.
Bad O line play, they all return this year.
Lose both top DE's that accounted for 19 sacks.
Lose best Wideout.
Freshman QB.
This all points to a down year, even more so than 2016.
We would have been 3-8 or 4-7 without Dobbs.
This.
Dobbs accounted for 13 total touchdowns rushing and receiving. He had three more rushing touchdowns than Kamara at 9, and overall accounted for 22% of the total touchdowns by the team in 2016 as a rusher or receiver.
Fans that think we won't accutely feel his absence in the 2017 season, or that Guarantano or Dormady will be able to produce on the same level, are deluding themselves to maintain unbridled optimism in the face of those statistics.
...and then there are the fans that can see those numbers and see them for what they are. Statistics from last season. A sane person can look at those numbers and understand that we probably not going to have 13 les touchdowns next year because Dobbs is gone. Or lose 22% of our Offensive touchdowns and productivity.
Yes. Dobbs had a lot of rushing TD's. What Dobbs did not do so much was...scramble, then throw the ball down field. If he scrambled, you could just about lay a bet that he was going to run with it. Was it effective? Yes. Does that mean every QB has to do it? No. A more pure passing QB, who can scramble can be just as effective. There were a lot of instances where Dobbs could have thrown the ball but didn't, that other QB's would have been able to make something happen through the air.
Is losing Dobbs going to effect the game? Sure. But to act like we're doomed because of it, without taking into account that gameplans will be changed to more suit the personnel we have now is just as asinine as people having "unbridled optimism".
Those stats are exactly that. Stats...from last season.
...and then there are the fans that can see those numbers and see them for what they are. Statistics from last season. A sane person can look at those numbers and understand that we probably not going to have 13 les touchdowns next year because Dobbs is gone. Or lose 22% of our Offensive touchdowns and productivity.
Yes. Dobbs had a lot of rushing TD's. What Dobbs did not do so much was...scramble, then throw the ball down field. If he scrambled, you could just about lay a bet that he was going to run with it. Was it effective? Yes. Does that mean every QB has to do it? No. A more pure passing QB, who can scramble can be just as effective. There were a lot of instances where Dobbs could have thrown the ball but didn't, that other QB's would have been able to make something happen through the air.
Is losing Dobbs going to effect the game? Sure. But to act like we're doomed because of it, without taking into account that gameplans will be changed to more suit the personnel we have now is just as asinine as people having "unbridled optimism".
Those stats are exactly that. Stats...from last season.
"unbridled optimism" is not asinine.
...and then there are the fans that can see those numbers and see them for what they are. Statistics from last season. A sane person can look at those numbers and understand that we probably not going to have 13 les touchdowns next year because Dobbs is gone. Or lose 22% of our Offensive touchdowns and productivity.
Yes. Dobbs had a lot of rushing TD's. What Dobbs did not do so much was...scramble, then throw the ball down field. If he scrambled, you could just about lay a bet that he was going to run with it. Was it effective? Yes. Does that mean every QB has to do it? No. A more pure passing QB, who can scramble can be just as effective. There were a lot of instances where Dobbs could have thrown the ball but didn't, that other QB's would have been able to make something happen through the air.
Is losing Dobbs going to effect the game? Sure. But to act like we're doomed because of it, without taking into account that gameplans will be changed to more suit the personnel we have now is just as asinine as people having "unbridled optimism".
Those stats are exactly that. Stats...from last season.
I would have to say that I definitely lean more in the direction of unbridled optimism than I do constant doom and gloom. I try not to lean to far in either direction, but if I have to choose...optimism is definitely more fun.
Hell, looking at things the way some people on here do...I was in the hospital for a week a little over a week ago with some pretty serious problems. Based off the way they look at past statistics, and predict the future based off of them, I'll be dead next week.
Just stats, numbers when not positive, to be disregarded until they cast an orange glow of WGWTFA? Right?
Guess how many rushing TDs Justin Worley had in his career at UT, 3. Guess how many rushing TDs Tyler Bray had at UT, 1. Guess how many rushing TDs Matt Simms had at Ut, 2. Guess how many rushing TDs Jonathan Crompton had, 3.Guess how many rushing TDs Eric Ainge had at UT, 1.
Josh Dobbs had more rushing TDs in one season, than the previous 5 starting QBs had in their entire careers at UT combined. There are several games in the 2016 season alone that would more than likely have been losses if not for Josh Dobbs' ability to rush for TDs. The idea that QD or JG is going to come in and perform anywhere near the same level as Dobbs in the area of rushing TDs is comically absurd.
Dobbs was a mediocre passer at best, but I doubt we'll ever see another QB at UT who can scramble out of bad plays, and score with his legs as well as him.
I just don't see it.
Blowout losses to Vanderbilt and Alabama. 3 in a row for Bama.
Bad secondary play. We lose our best cover guy.
Bad O line play, they all return this year.
Lose both top DE's that accounted for 19 sacks.
Lose best Wideout.
Freshman QB.
This all points to a down year, even more so than 2016.
Just stats, numbers when not positive, to be disregarded until they cast an orange glow of WGWTFA? Right?
Guess how many rushing TDs Justin Worley had in his career at UT, 3. Guess how many rushing TDs Tyler Bray had at UT, 1. Guess how many rushing TDs Matt Simms had at Ut, 2. Guess how many rushing TDs Jonathan Crompton had, 3.Guess how many rushing TDs Eric Ainge had at UT, 1.
Josh Dobbs had more rushing TDs in one season, than the previous 5 starting QBs had in their entire careers at UT combined. There are several games in the 2016 season alone that would more than likely have been losses if not for Josh Dobbs' ability to rush for TDs. The idea that QD or JG is going to come in and perform anywhere near the same level as Dobbs in the area of rushing TDs is comically absurd.
Dobbs was a mediocre passer at best, but I doubt we'll ever see another QB at UT who can scramble out of bad plays, and score with his legs as well as him.
You're wound up pretty tight about QB's running for TD's aren't you? Is there something wrong with scrambling out of a bad play and passing the ball these days?
Josh Dobbs had as many rushing TD's in a season as Manning had in his career here. Guess what? Dobbs had 53 passing TD's in his career...Manning had 89. All of Dobbs TD's (passing,rushing and receiving) combined don't equal Manning's passing TD's. Falls short by two. That's not counting Manning's 12 rushing TD's.
Dobbs 53 passing TD's
Ainge 72 passing TD's
Bray 69 Passing TD's
Crompton only started one full season...guess what? He matched Dobb's best season for passing TD's with 27...had 36 total, but only played in 7,7,8 games prior to starting his senior year.
Worley and Simms both sucked pretty much all around. Worley was tough as nails, but that did not translate into being a good QB.
Casey Clausen passed for 75 TD's, ran for 6.
In two years as a starter, Tee Martin passed for 31 TD's and ran for 16. You have to go all the way back to 98-99 to find a comparable QB to Dobbs as far as running vs passing. Yet most of those teams (excluding the really sucky QB's, put up pretty decent numbers in spite of not having a running QB.
We can play numbers games all day long...it does not change the fact that next year is a different year and using prior stats to predict next year will do you absolutely no good.
You can maintain the "We gonna lose our ******* asses" attitude all you want. In the end it is really just making you look like a fool since those numbers you're trying to use as a basis for UT's success or failure have been proven to be an exception rather than a rule. In the past 20+ years UT has had 2 suck ass QB's, 2 really good/great DT QB's and several really good/great passing QB's.
None of which is going to make a damn bit of difference next season.
So you are saying that the sheer act of Jalen Hurd quitting the team on 10/31/2016, caused the UT offense to not be able to score more than 3 points in the second half of the Vanderbilt game on 11/26/2016? :thud: