Vol8188
revolUTion in the air!
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2011
- Messages
- 52,598
- Likes
- 52,401
And lol at kicking gang bangers and drug dealers out as a negative impact on the economy
I think most of those against it don't care about the method, they don't want it in the first place.
That's a nice story stoked. Hopefully your friends stay on the straight and narrow, b/c I'd hate to see them go but the gangs which are big in metropolitan areas need to go immediately. Once the hard core criminals are gone, then we can figure out what to do with your friends
But there lies the problem. It's a pipe dream that the American taxpayer will end up footing the bill on. I would love to see far stricter immigration enforcement, but not as $20 billion worth to build this wonderful wall. Because tariff or no tariff, Mexico isn't paying for it.
However, the idea and concept of Mexico paying for it "or else" is nothing more than red meat to the masses.
But there lies the problem. It's a pipe dream that the American taxpayer will end up footing the bill on. I would love to see far stricter immigration enforcement, but not as $20 billion worth to build this wonderful wall. Because tariff or no tariff, Mexico isn't paying for it.
However, the idea and concept of Mexico paying for it "or else" is nothing more than red meat to the masses.
Im not sure how you took what I posted and got there. Im not arguing that. Only that most that are against a wall don't want it even if its free.
And that's something I agree with. But I think others are pragmatic in their opposition because they know the bill will end up right back where it started. And the taxpayer getting bent over.
Again, I'm not in opposition to the wall or enhanced security. What I am in opposition to is the way it's being advertised. Sorry if you took my post as you inferring anything other than you wrote. It was not my intention.
How smart is Donald J. Trump?
He's not only somehow duped serious national media into legitimizing and dignifying his campaign of casual bigotry and hate by treating him as a serious presidential candidate, but he's also duped millions of Americans into thinking that illegal immigration, a problem that was much more demanding two decades ago, is the biggest problem facing this country today.
So either Donald J. Trump is smarter than the rest of us, or we're all just so stupid it doesn't make any difference whether he's smarter or not.
How is that any different than Cankles?How smart is Donald J. Trump?
He's not only somehow duped serious national media into legitimizing and dignifying his campaign of casual bigotry and hate by treating him as a serious presidential candidate, but he's also duped millions of Americans into thinking that illegal immigration, a problem that was much more demanding two decades ago, is the biggest problem facing this country today.
So either Donald J. Trump is smarter than the rest of us, or we're all just so stupid it doesn't make any difference whether he's smarter or not.
How smart is Donald J. Trump?
He's not only somehow duped serious national media into legitimizing and dignifying his campaign of casual bigotry and hate by treating him as a serious presidential candidate, but he's also duped millions of Americans into thinking that illegal immigration, a problem that was much more demanding two decades ago, is the biggest problem facing this country today.
So either Donald J. Trump is smarter than the rest of us, or we're all just so stupid it doesn't make any difference whether he's smarter or not.
I'm a Cruz guy and will vote for him in Florida. But he has made mistakes and those have hurt him. After Iowa, he should've have done far more to reach out to Libertarian voters in general and Rand Paul voters specifically. Instead, he continued in an overly-narrow focus on evangelical voters.
A large part of Cruz's message should have been about religious, social, and economic freedom and the threat the establishment poses against those freedoms and the Bill of Rights. This message would have been well-received on both religious and secular fronts.
His decision to focus his efforts on the evangelical voter have boxed him in much the same way they got Huckabee in the previous election cycles.
Another thing that turns people off about Cruz is his need to convince people he is the smartest man in the room at all times. This leads to lengthy answers in debates and lengthy speeches after campaigns that people tend to tune out. Trump and Rubio understand the importance of the short sound-byte. Cruz has yet to get it.
The other thing is this: you can't engage in Marquess of Queensbury rules in a hockey brawl. You can put yourself on a pedestal and proclaim yourself above the fray. But that doesn't do you any good when Dave Schultz or Bob Probert shows up to jack your jaw with either his fist or his CCM stick.
You aren't going to win votes in a nasty election getting your ass kicked by the goon in an effort to look "presidential." Your side will feel sorry for you. But that will not win you any extra support. If playing nice won this kind of election, then Ben Carson would be leading in a landslide.
That's what always cracks me up about his constant references to "I've only spent $X amount on campaign and Candidate Y spent enough to choke a rhino."
No kidding guy, you don't need to spend money when the media is constantly saying "WTF did Donald just say?" and reporting on it for days on end. So wham, bam, thank you ma'am, free coverage and free campaign exposure. And other than the Pope comments the other day, he really hasn't gone off the deep end making comments since getting a comfortable lead. He has run a brilliant campaign by making the media report on him and give him the most exposure of any candidate.
So yes, he is really smart by making as controversial comments as he can and letting the media campaign for him.
