Over Signing and the attrition that follows.

#77
#77
I will say that I really don't care about any of this except the hypocrisy. When Alabama and Saban do it, it's wrong.

Well, clearly, the Saban model is in full effect at Tennessee.

Again, not a big deal. Just can't whine about what other schools are doing anymore.
 
Last edited:
#78
#78
Some figures posted by LWS in the FF. Seems relevant here.
e):

2014

UK- 0, 0%
LSU- 0, 0%
VU- 0, 0%
Bama- 1, 4%
Aub- 1, 4%
UF- 1, 4%
UM- 1, 4%
TAM- 1, 5%
Ark- 2, 8%
MU- 3, 11%
MSU- 3, 13%
UGA- 4, 19%
USCe- 5, 24%
UT- 8, 25%



2013


LSU- 2, 8%
Aub- 2, 9%
Bama- 4, 16%
UK- 3, 13%
VU- 4, 15%
Ark- 4, 17%
UF- 5, 17%
MU- 4, 20%
UGA- 9, 27%
MSU- 5, 24%
USCe- 6, 29%
TAM- 10, 31%
UM- 9, 33%
UT- 8, 35%

Total players lost over the past two years:

Bama- 5
Ark-6
Aub- 3
UF- 6
UGA- 13
UK- 3
LSU- 2
UM- 10
MSU- 8
MU- 7
USCe- 11
UT- 16
TAM- 11
VU- 4

That study had the 10 year attrition rates for all SEC teams. No team was below 35% and UT's was about 41%. That included Kiffin's class which was at 79%.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#79
#79
Some figures posted by LWS in the FF. Seems relevant here.
e):

2014

UK- 0, 0%
LSU- 0, 0%
VU- 0, 0%
Bama- 1, 4%
Aub- 1, 4%
UF- 1, 4%
UM- 1, 4%
TAM- 1, 5%
Ark- 2, 8%
MU- 3, 11%
MSU- 3, 13%
UGA- 4, 19%
USCe- 5, 24%
UT- 8, 25%



2013


LSU- 2, 8%
Aub- 2, 9%
Bama- 4, 16%
UK- 3, 13%
VU- 4, 15%
Ark- 4, 17%
UF- 5, 17%
MU- 4, 20%
UGA- 9, 27%
MSU- 5, 24%
USCe- 6, 29%
TAM- 10, 31%
UM- 9, 33%
UT- 8, 35%

Total players lost over the past two years:

Bama- 5
Ark-6
Aub- 3
UF- 6
UGA- 13
UK- 3
LSU- 2
UM- 10
MSU- 8
MU- 7
USCe- 11
UT- 16
TAM- 11
VU- 4

I went back to the study and looked at the first 3 years that Saban was at Bama. They lost 40 players during that time period. It is obvious Saban was clearing the roster and establishing his culture. It looks like this is what is happening for us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#81
#81
That study had the 10 year attrition rates for all SEC teams. No team was below 35% and UT's was about 41%. That included Kiffin's class which was at 79%.

What coaches did attrition wise before Butch got to UT doesn't really factor in Imo to today and Butch's over signing techniques. That's why I used the numbers for the last 2 years. Also other SEC numbers for the last 2 years.

I see folks continue to say "everyone does it".

AU, VU, AR, UK all had coaching changes as well. All those schools combined lost the same 16 UT did by itself.

Obviously not everyone I suppose.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#82
#82
Some people choose to own and operate the corner store. Others choose to rob and burglarize it. They are both OK because others do it too.
 
#83
#83
What coaches did attrition wise before Butch got to UT doesn't really factor in Imo to today and Butch's over signing techniques. That's why I used the numbers for the last 2 years. Also other SEC numbers for the last 2 years.

I see folks continue to say "everyone does it".

AU, VU, AR, UK all had coaching changes as well. All those schools combined lost the same 16 UT did by itself.

Obviously not everyone I suppose.

Do you really think VU and UK are trying to flip their rosters to get to an SEC Championship? They are both happy with competitive. Auburn brought back their OC from just a year or two prior and they always recruited at a high level. Arkansas under Petrino had very good talent so maybe the roster didn't need the massive overhaul that our roster needed, but it is clearly your best argument.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#84
#84
Do you really think VU and UK are trying to flip their rosters to get to an SEC Championship? They are both happy with competitive. Auburn brought back their OC from just a year or two prior and they always recruited at a high level. Arkansas under Petrino had very good talent so maybe the roster didn't need the massive overhaul that our roster needed, but it is clearly your best argument.

I'm not spinning it. You are.
 
#85
#85
Do you really think VU and UK are trying to flip their rosters to get to an SEC Championship? They are both happy with competitive. Auburn brought back their OC from just a year or two prior and they always recruited at a high level. Arkansas under Petrino had very good talent so maybe the roster didn't need the massive overhaul that our roster needed, but it is clearly your best argument.

This.

As usual, he is just framing the argument to fit his agenda.
 
#87
#87
I will say that I really don't care about any of this except the hypocrisy. When Alabama and Saban do it, it's wrong.

Well, clearly, the Saban model is in full effect at Tennessee.

Again, not a big deal. Just can't whine about what other schools are doing anymore.
Word
 
#91
#91
I think it's a blast. Its all in the approach you take to it imo.

Unlike you, some of us are inherently positive people who choose to assume the best about people and situations until it becomes clear the best doesn't apply. The whole reason I hang out in the RF is avoid the constant barrage of negative people in the FF. Sadly, the RF is no longer a safe place either. Well done.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#92
#92
Unlike you, some of us are inherently positive people who choose to assume the best about people and situations until it becomes clear the best doesn't apply. The whole reason I hang out in the RF is avoid the constant barrage of negative people in the FF. Sadly, the RF is no longer a safe place either. Well done.

I'm a very positive person away from VN. On VN there are a lot of positives I speak out about. There are also negatives. Its just the negatives get more responses than the positives. When I say something positive, I'm just "in the group". When something I have an opinion on is views as negative, it seems to be a much larger talking point for the board. I just roll with it. I take the approach of say what ya wanna say and don't really care what others think about it. By doing that, I find it very enjoyable.
 
#93
#93
I'm not as smart as some of the experts on VN but for some reason I would think we need to have a certain amount of attrition to avoid having 15-20 over the 85 limit. If we did sign 25 each year we want to keep about 21 of the very best of them (that means we lose about 4 each class). But if we sign 25-30 each year we need to have a higher attrition rate to avoid having too many, so more have to find another place to go.
Am I missing something or is all this too difficult for the average person to understand?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#94
#94
I'm not as smart as some of the experts on VN but for some reason I would think we need to have a certain amount of attrition to avoid having 15-20 over the 85 limit. If we did sign 25 each year we want to keep about 21 of the very best of them (that means we lose about 4 each class). But if we sign 25-30 each year we need to have a higher attrition rate to avoid having too many, so more have to find another place to go.
Am I missing something or is all this too difficult for the average person to understand?

Attrition is a given and normal to a degree. Leading the conference year after year, not so much. I'm honestly hoping the UT coaches don't have the mindset some fans do(no time to develop Signee's, if they are not starting as a SO, dump em quick). The blueprint thus far IMO doesn't look good. We'll see how it plays out over the next couple years. Butch has signed about 80 kids in 3 classes. Now he is blue shirting forward to the next class so he can take more. Maybe it works. Maybe it blows up in their faces.
 
#96
#96
What coaches did attrition wise before Butch got to UT doesn't really factor in Imo to today and Butch's over signing techniques. That's why I used the numbers for the last 2 years. Also other SEC numbers for the last 2 years.

I see folks continue to say "everyone does it".

AU, VU, AR, UK all had coaching changes as well. All those schools combined lost the same 16 UT did by itself.

Obviously not everyone I suppose.

Any comment on the attrition rate I posted on Saban's first three years at Bama?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#97
#97
I'm not as smart as some of the experts on VN but for some reason I would think we need to have a certain amount of attrition to avoid having 15-20 over the 85 limit. If we did sign 25 each year we want to keep about 21 of the very best of them (that means we lose about 4 each class). But if we sign 25-30 each year we need to have a higher attrition rate to avoid having too many, so more have to find another place to go.
Am I missing something or is all this too difficult for the average person to understand?

With your simplistic reasoning you are missing the grand conspiracy of Butch, who is pursuing a devious recruiting methodology in the football program akin to nothing seen in CFB before. A real Dr. Doom type thing. NCAA waiting on the doorstep to pound him into submission, with parents everywhere hiding their young men when he comes to town. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#98
#98
I'm not trying to start a conspiracy theory, but have any of you ever seen Leb and Barbara Dooley in the same place?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#99
#99
I'm a very positive person away from VN. On VN there are a lot of positives I speak out about. There are also negatives. Its just the negatives get more responses than the positives. When I say something positive, I'm just "in the group". When something I have an opinion on is views as negative, it seems to be a much larger talking point for the board. I just roll with it. I take the approach of say what ya wanna say and don't really care what others think about it. By doing that, I find it very enjoyable.

Thanks for such an enlightened rationalization. It is nice to hear you admit to throwing criticism into the forum just to get noticed.

I don't think we'll be hanging out outside of the forum do I guess I'm going to miss out on mister positivity and have to settle for Crotchety McJudgement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person

VN Store



Back
Top