Vol_is_Lyfe18
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2014
- Messages
- 2,575
- Likes
- 2,116
No, I didn't. I was mentioning that Dobbs can win in the SEC. He did it as a freshman. Worley beat one team, as a senior, and had to get bailed out by his WR. Worley is nothing special.
Dobbs made his debut in Tuscaloosca, but didn't look amywhere near as bad as Peterman. Peterman literally hasn't shown pontential yet. Dobbs has. That's why there are so little Peterman supporters.
Yeah, But if our below average senior QB always throws INT's and gets himself sacked(always blamed on OL).....what difference does it make? Can Dobbs be worse? no....he can run and may make better decisions.
Dobbs was put in when the game when we were down 5 touchdowns and Alabama had clearly called off the dogs. Not even close to the situations Peterman was put in. Plus Dobbs looked like crap against Mizzou.
How do you draw the conclusion that Dobbs is crap? We saw him for half a season. We've seen Worley for over a season now and he just isn't SEC quality. In no way is Dobbs the savior yet, but counting him out is ignorant.
He was a sad puppy to watch. Like I said I like them all. I like that he has no eyebrows and is a genius and literally a rocket scientist. I envision the star wars crowd and UT engineers being huge fans. He still isn't very good.
So Peterman plays terribly against an eventual 4-8 Florida team and it's okay, but it's unacceptable for Dobbs to play poorly against the eventual SEC east champs? Okay
Well apparently it's ok for you and others to decide Peterman is a bust and has no potential based on little playing time, but Dobbs gets a half season of very underwelming play and you think he's clearly better.
That makes no sense.