Not at all. Honestly, what is lewd, offensive, or objectionable material? The Bible tells us that neither slavery nor genocide is necessarily bad. Yet, I'm sure some students will seek recourse in the Old Testament. Why isn't this objectionable? I find this much more objectionable, quite frankly, than a student whose religion promotes drug use. But I guess Rastafaris and certain Native American peyote religions don't count under this law. Meanwhile, those who persecute against people who eat pork get to run amok.
I don't see how you think I'm stretching. This is just common sense. Who gets to decide what religious perspective is lewd, offensive, or objectionable? This is a legal nightmare, and it won't hold up in courts, no matter how much you think I hate Christians. And by the way, I don't hate Christians. I do, however, despise the Old Testament and Paul. I don't think Christians have ever fully known what to do with either one of them.