Vol_Doc
Vol in "The Ville"
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2011
- Messages
- 3,826
- Likes
- 2,440
Well that didn't last long
http://thehill.com/policy/national-...-contempt-after?amp&__twitter_impression=true
Bwahahaha....the guy caught multiple times plagiarizing other's thoughts....I mean having um..."iphone keyboard disturbances"..... is going to prattle on about independent thinking. That's richer than grandma's German chocolate cake.Isnt it funny how the Dems all stick together straight down party lines, zero independent thinkers, at least publicly.
Guess youd call it sticking with the mob mentality, regardless of what you believe.
On "America's Newsroom," Dershowitz, a Harvard Law professor emeritus, reiterated what he wrote in his book, "The Case Against Impeaching Trump." He said evidence of specific crimes must be present in order to move forward with impeachment, whether it's Rosenstein or Trump.
He emphasized that the process cannot be based on political differences, blasting Republicans for a "short-sighted" and "stupid" maneuver.
"If you don't like the way Rod Rosenstein is responding to your subpoena, charge him with contempt of court. Bring him to court. But do not use impeachment. That just helps the Democrats who are trying to impeach Trump. It's a dumb, dumb decision," he said, adding Republicans' impeachment articles do not charge crimes.
Isnt it funny how the Dems all stick together straight down party lines, zero independent thinkers, at least publicly.
Guess youd call it sticking with the mob mentality, regardless of what you believe.
Well that didn't last long
http://thehill.com/policy/national-...-contempt-after?amp&__twitter_impression=true
LOL...says the cult-like Trump stooges. Pot-kettle. He isn't your representative to make that claim even if it was valid.
What are you talking about? I haven't been anywhere, you fraudulent dolt.
awe ur painties just get in a wad when you cannot answer questions, or your narrative get's debunked...care to try again with the substantive questions i posed?
What do the Democrats plan to run on? I know House Dems conjured up a slogan: 'For the people'. What does that mean exactly? I just cant seem to find the specifics of a central Dem message that most Americans care about.
Heres the GOPs pitch, which one of these dont Dems support?:
Better Off Now
awe ur painties just get in a wad when you cannot answer questions, or your narrative get's debunked...care to try again with the substantive questions i posed?
What do the Democrats plan to run on? I know House Dems conjured up a slogan: 'For the people'. What does that mean exactly? I just cant seem to find the specifics of a central Dem message that most Americans care about.
Heres the GOPs pitch, which one of these dont Dems support?:
Better Off Now
Impeachment would be a stupid move. Just hold him in contempt of congress and pressure (oh what's his name) the guy holding the AG job to file the charges.
Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) says he is tabling his efforts to impeach Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein after having several meetings with Republican leadership, stating that he would instead pursue contempt if the Justice Department (DOJ) does not turn over documents Congress is seeking.
Conservatives blast republicans all the time, republicans have a hard time getting legislation passed because they don't agree even when they are the majority. Hardly ever do you hear Dems criticizing Dems and when they are in the majority they stay in lockstep to pass legislation.
That's a big reason I won't consider voting for Bredesen, he'll just fall in line and do as he's told.