GoBigOrangeVols
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2008
- Messages
- 8,517
- Likes
- 5,320
I've heard people mention "face to face" meetings as being disallowed, but waving a sign at a football game and texting is not "face to face". Or am I wrong about the meaning of the term "face to face"?
I would say that this would be overblown IF there weren't so many secondary violations in the past year. But now, it causes the NCAA to take a serious look into the program. But that doesn't necessarily mean anything will come out of it.
You would think that the NCAA would be circumspect enough to just confirm a general investigation rather than telling the NY Times that its investigation centered on the "use of hostesses," because whether there's anything to this or not, they're pretty much ensuring that our college girls are going to get reputations as whores. Nice.
they were just talking about this on 104.5 here in nashville.
They said we supposedly sent hostesses to a recruits high school game with signs saying come to UT. If that's not legal I can't believe we would do it. That is something that is hard to hide.
Are you serious? Really? Check out how many secondary violations other schools of comparative nature have in the same amount of time before you attempt to act like you know what you are talking about next time.
These NCAA rules are getting ridiculous. What is the rationale behind most of these rules? It honestly seems like they make rules just for the sake of making rules.
Texting is not allowed per NCAA rules in recruiting. Which means that if a representative of the university starts texting a recruit, then things can start going downhill. It's something that people just don't understand about recruiting, is that these kids are protected by the NCAA.
Now pardon my above post. I read the article, sounds fishy. The timing seems as though somethings being orchestrated. Say we turn up clean in Jan, but we've lost 4 guys because of it, what will we get, an apology letter from the NCAA? IMO if they were sure they had us wouldn't they wait til these guys sign and play then come down hard? Who knows? But I definately don't like it.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
We're talking about the NYT, which has be one little more than a leftist opinion paper whose dwindling revenues now drive it to be as sensationalist as possible.
Now pardon my above post. I read the article, sounds fishy. The timing seems as though somethings being orchestrated. Say we turn up clean in Jan, but we've lost 4 guys because of it, what will we get, an apology letter from the NCAA? IMO if they were sure they had us wouldn't they wait til these guys sign and play then come down hard? Who knows? But I definately don't like it.
Posted via VolNation Mobile