To be fair he didn't say he would win the heisman he said he was the greatest running back he'd ever seen.. fwiw kiper has Barkley as the number one player on his board ...
Understand that. My point is that the greatest running back in the history of GOD didnt even get a Heisman invite because he couldnt run for 100 yards in more than 4 of 12 games/only averaged more than 5 yards per carry in 5 of 12 games. The greatest running backs Ive ever seen play in college simply couldnt be stopped, they were dominant. Barkley has been very good, at times spectacular, multidimensional. But he hasnt proven that he belongs anywhere near the discussion of all time greatest.
And I hate that Barkley is a pawn in this debate here, because I dont really mean to disparage him, hes obviously very talented and Ive said before that hes one of the best collegiate running backs in the country THIS YEAR, perhaps even the best. Just pointing out that all the evidence points out that D4H is once again horribly wrong with his player evaluations.....so arrogant, so smug, yet has no earthly idea what hes seeing/watching.