Russia says 60 dead, 145 injured in concert hall raid; Islamic State group claims responsibility

#327
#327
Velo Vol said:
We did it. There's no other possible explanation.

Click to expand...

The Russian media is on orders to put the full court press on. You don't attempt to rally your populace like this unless you either fear you might lose them.........or you are planning something that the people would initially resist. Or some combination of the two.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BeardedVol
#329
#329
  • Like
Reactions: Rasputin_Vol and volgr
#330
#330
Those who live in reality, outside of the western death cult propaganda narrative, knows who was behind this attack.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Rasputin_Vol
#334
#334
Rasputin_Vol said:
Seems like a reasonable response and request.
Click to expand...
no its not. Its typical lawyer drivel. He says a whole lot, while actually saying nothing at all.

he makes a claim, the GUR using ISIS, but provides no information, data, or back up. he doesn't attempt to explain why they would ever need to use ISIS as a cover, they are already at war and have struck plenty of targets inside Russia, including some civilian. He doesn't explain why the GUR would want these guys to try and return, instead of blowing themselves up in typical ISIS fashion. the only person them not killing themselves helped were the potential victims, and Putin.

He says the west provided little information and lied about what it did say, but doesn't provide evidence. and considering ISIS had video of the incident its going to be really hard to refute that or blame the west unless they can prove ISIS got the video from the west.

He says Russia has provided a plethora of information, but provides none of it. he also doesn't give any examples of how the Russian information was better or right. seems if there was so much good evidence, he could have used an example or quoted someone.

he then makes another useless supposition about the bombing at the grave site in Iran. He mentions three months after the war in Gaza, but neither the dead guy nor ISIS has anything to do with the war in Gaza, so that is useless red meat just to get your lather up.

its no wonder you guys get so much stuff wrong if you think this is reasonable. it provided ZERO information, zero context, none of the claims are backed up, and he literally just throws in some completely unrelated conspiracy notes in the typical logical fallacy of those who buy into every conspiratorial matter. If you deny X, you also deny a completely unrelated Y, because I drew some completely arbitrary connection the two. every point needs to stand on its own, otherwise you assigning value where there is none, and making conclusions before you have any real information.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pennheel, UT_Dutchman, MG1968 and 1 other person
#336
#336
LouderVol said:
no its not. Its typical lawyer drivel. He says a whole lot, while actually saying nothing at all.

he makes a claim, the GUR using ISIS, but provides no information, data, or back up. he doesn't attempt to explain why they would ever need to use ISIS as a cover, they are already at war and have struck plenty of targets inside Russia, including some civilian. He doesn't explain why the GUR would want these guys to try and return, instead of blowing themselves up in typical ISIS fashion. the only person them not killing themselves helped were the potential victims, and Putin.

He says the west provided little information and lied about what it did say, but doesn't provide evidence. and considering ISIS had video of the incident its going to be really hard to refute that or blame the west unless they can prove ISIS got the video from the west.

He says Russia has provided a plethora of information, but provides none of it. he also doesn't give any examples of how the Russian information was better or right. seems if there was so much good evidence, he could have used an example or quoted someone.

he then makes another useless supposition about the bombing at the grave site in Iran. He mentions three months after the war in Gaza, but neither the dead guy nor ISIS has anything to do with the war in Gaza, so that is useless red meat just to get your lather up.

its no wonder you guys get so much stuff wrong if you think this is reasonable. it provided ZERO information, zero context, none of the claims are backed up, and he literally just throws in some completely unrelated conspiracy notes in the typical logical fallacy of those who buy into every conspiratorial matter. If you deny X, you also deny a completely unrelated Y, because I drew some completely arbitrary connection the two. every point needs to stand on its own, otherwise you assigning value where there is none, and making conclusions before you have any real information.
Click to expand...

ISIS-K is very likely controlled by western intelligence.
 
#344
#344
Pacer92 said:
We know they’re a western/Mossad conception.

The only time they ever hit Israel with anything…they claimed it was by mistake and apologized immediately after..
Click to expand...
So ISIS and Israel were allegedly shooting at each other in Syria, yet the head chopping terrorists apologized to them? Who believes this nonsense?

Ex-defense minister says IS ‘apologized’ to Israel for November clash

“There was one case recently where Daesh opened fire and apologized,” Ya’alon said, using the terror group’s Arabic nickname.

This was an apparent reference to a clash that took place near the Syrian border last November, in which IDF troops exchanged fire with members of the Islamic State affiliate. After a brief gun battle, the Israeli military attacked the terrorist group with airstrikes and tank fire, killing four of them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pacer92
#345
#345
If the US had been warned by Great Britain and Russia that a terrorist attack was coming, then this happened, Ras and Volgr would be adamant that the US let it happen as some sort false flag scenario. But here they are and it's just crickets and bs now.

 
  • Like
Reactions: PKT_VOL, jp1, davethevol and 3 others
#350
#350
volfanhill said:
If the US had been warned by Great Britain and Russia that a terrorist attack was coming, then this happened, Ras and Volgr would be adamant that the US let it happen as some sort false flag scenario. But here they are and it's just crickets and bs now.

Click to expand...


The US didnt follow proper channels nor did they share actual intel (all of which Russia did before the Boston Marathon attack).

General terror warnings arent worth much, especially when you are at war and Ukraine has been carrying out terror attacks frequently.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top