ClearwaterVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2008
- Messages
- 16,115
- Likes
- 17,664
It all began with a traffic stop while Bundy and some of his followers were en route to a community meeting in John Day, about 70 miles away.
Shots were fired after FBI agents, Oregon State troopers and other law enforcement agencies made the stop.
One person, who was the subject of a federal probable cause arrest died. It's unclear who fired first.
FBI/LE has now blocked all the roads going to the area. I wonder why the FBI decided to escalate last night?
FBI/LE has now blocked all the roads going to the area. I wonder why the FBI decided to escalate last night?
A 60 year old man running towards someone is not reason to shoot and kill. If he appeared to be armed, then that's different, otherwise it is murder. That's why all video recordings need to be released. If they don't release any, then they're hiding what actually happened.There's a long history in America of using of civil disobedience to bring attention to political causes and agendas. IMO there's nothing wrong with that. If you demonstrate and break the law you go to jail for a day or two and pay a fine. It's a price you're willing to pay and your cause gets attention. If enough people agree with you change may come.
However when those idiots brought guns to the party the equation changed. It basically became an unlawful armed conflict. I'm sorry someone got killed but the blood is on the hands of the ranchers not the government.
A 60 year old man running towards someone is not reason to shoot and kill. If he appeared to be armed, then that's different, otherwise it is murder. That's why all video recordings need to be released. If they don't release any, then they're hiding what actually happened.
There's a long history in America of using of civil disobedience to bring attention to political causes and agendas. IMO there's nothing wrong with that. If you demonstrate and break the law you go to jail for a day or two and pay a fine. It's a price you're willing to pay and your cause gets attention. If enough people agree with you change may come.
However when those idiots brought guns to the party the equation changed. It basically became an unlawful armed conflict. I'm sorry someone got killed but the blood is on the hands of the ranchers not the government.
There's a claim the guy that was killed had his hands up. Where's the "hands up, don't shoot crowd" on this one?
I was questioning the poster who stated the deceased was running towards the lawmen. Now you say he had his hands up. Where are you getting your information? Nothing has been released that I can find.