Manafort Trial Thread

#651
#651
Septic said:
I can't give you a reason any sane person would make a threat. You seem to have a tighter grasp on reasons for crazy thought, which is why I figured you might have the inside track on who dun it.
Click to expand...

Ok a sane person probably didn’t make the threat. So we agree it was a lefty. Good glad we reached consensus.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Franklin Pierce
#653
#653
Septic said:
It's like KFC except with more Jesus.
Click to expand...

giphy.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: zeppelin128 and NorthDallas40
#656
#656
zeppelin128 said:
Quite the leap there, since details of the threats were not mentioned in the article. You have no clue whatsoever about the nature of the threats. Of course any chance to call for violence against the left and you jump all over it.
Click to expand...

That's not really a great leap of imagination the way the left has been acting the last couple of years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FLVOL_79
#659
#659
lawgator1 said:
Unfortunately it is not all that uncommon for judges to receive threats. They tend to be pranks, just because they have a moment of fame. But, threatening a federal judge is no joke. They catch you, its prison. For. Sure.




Please. After a few days of Fox and Trump chortling and shifting gears from the current mantra of "The Manafort trial has nothing to do with Trump" to a new version of "The Manafort trial was all about Trump," it will fade into nothingness.
Click to expand...

Lol..says the guy whose party base still thinks Russia stole the election from Hillary...almost 2 years later.. This Manafort trial is gonna crush and demoralize your party if he doesnt get the book thrown at him.
 
#665
#665
Franklin Pierce said:
I think they will convict on some charges and exonerate on others.

But why in the hell was the Special Counsel, hired to investigate Trump colllusion with Russians, involved in this?
Click to expand...
Why the hell cant he get a slam dunk conviction on 10 year old known financial crimes.

It’s beyond time for a Mueller Amateur Hour thread.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FLVOL_79 and AirVol
#670
#670
Franklin Pierce said:
I think they will convict on some charges and exonerate on others.

But why in the hell was the Special Counsel, hired to investigate Trump colllusion with Russians, involved in this?
Click to expand...

Because Rosenstein's mandate appointing Mueller as special counsel gave him the authority too.

"any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation" So If he discovers any federal crime that may have been committed within the statute of limitations it is his job to either A. investigate and indict or B. investigate and refer to the proper U.S. Attorney (Example Micheal Cohen's case was referred to the SDNY U.S. Attorney.)

Rosenstein letter appointing Mueller special counsel
 
#671
#671
NorthDallas40 said:
Why the hell cant he get a slam dunk conviction on 10 year old known financial crimes.

It’s beyond time for a Mueller Amateur Hour thread.
Click to expand...

Watergate lasted 4 years, Whitewater 7 years, Mueller is well within the correct amount of time.
 
#672
#672
carlos86 said:
Watergate lasted 4 years, Whitewater 7 years, Mueller is well within the correct amount of time.
Click to expand...

Yeah worn out excuse. Both had actual activities related to POTUS by 18 months in not 10 year old financial crimes by a short timer underling. Keep the dream alive though Carlos.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AirVol
#674
#674
NorthDallas40 said:
Yeah worn out excuse. Both had actual activities related to POTUS by 18 months in not 10 year old financial crimes by a short timer underling. Keep the dream alive though Carlos.
Click to expand...
Might want to brush up on Whitewater and they still didn't have sh!t on the Clintons.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top