volmaverick
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2012
- Messages
- 6,036
- Likes
- 13
Well it looks like the IRS knew as far back as 2011 that tea party group were being singled out. so what did the Obama administration know and when did they no it?
Apparently during the time period in question 300 applications for 501(c)(4) status were sent these follow up questionnaires. Of those, just 75 involved Tea Party organizations, so let's not pretend like it was just they who were subject to this closer scrutiny.
And that 300 is out of 3,400 such applications. So, of 3,400 applicaitons, just 75 were conservative groups getting the questionnaire, and that's because of an explosion in the growth of such applications during that timeframe.
IRS officials knew of agents
It would be much more disturbing if there were some sort of indication that tea party type groups were being DENIED their applications at a higher rate than others, and if that could be traced to some political motivation.
Yeah you are right, apparently some Jewish groups were targeted as well.
Apparently during the time period in question 300 applications for 501(c)(4) status were sent these follow up questionnaires. Of those, just 75 involved Tea Party organizations, so let's not pretend like it was just they who were subject to this closer scrutiny.
And that 300 is out of 3,400 such applications. So, of 3,400 applicaitons, just 75 were conservative groups getting the questionnaire, and that's because of an explosion in the growth of such applications during that timeframe.
IRS officials knew of agents
It would be much more disturbing if there were some sort of indication that tea party type groups were being DENIED their applications at a higher rate than others, and if that could be traced to some political motivation.
My point is that the claim they ere "targeted" based on a political motivation seems pretty far fetched. Plus, it doesn't seem like there is a claim that it made any difference in getting approved, much less not getting approved for a politically-based reason.
Seems like much ado about nada.
My point is that the claim they ere "targeted" based on a political motivation seems pretty far fetched. Plus, it doesn't seem like there is a claim that it made any difference in getting approved, much less not getting approved for a politically-based reason.
Seems like much ado about nada.
Watch Meet the Press this morning? Dianne Feinstein is actually concerned about this. Pretty much said an investigation is needed. I don't like the tea party, but this sure isn't the way to shut them up.
You're the poster boy for head in the sand liberals everywhere....a sheep among sheep....a clump in the litter box
IRS targeted groups that criticized the government, IG report says
You're the poster boy for head in the sand liberals everywhere....a sheep among sheep....a clump in the litter box
IRS targeted groups that criticized the government, IG report says
Not sure how he can say it's much ado about nada when the IRS actually comes out and admits they've been doing it. The whole situation is effed up, and it is a big deal.
Government effing sucks, and Obama's about worse than Bush.
Watch Meet the Press this morning? Dianne Feinstein is actually concerned about this. Pretty much said an investigation is needed. I don't like the tea party, but this sure isn't the way to shut them up.
Organizations were singled out because they included the words "tea party" or "patriot" in their applications for tax-exempt status, said Lois Lerner, who heads the IRS division that oversees tax-exempt groups.
In some cases, groups were asked for their list of donors, which violates IRS policy in most cases, she said.
"That was wrong. That was absolutely incorrect, it was insensitive and it was inappropriate. That's not how we go about selecting cases for further review," Lerner said at a conference sponsored by the American Bar Association.
"The IRS would like to apologize for that," she added.