malinoisvol
Pick up your Balls and Rattle your Cannons!
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2014
- Messages
- 86,927
- Likes
- 71,394
Not trying to sound like a smart a$$ but the OL did fine when Dobbs came in. They have run zone blocking scheme ever since Jones has set foot on campus, zone blocking doesn't fair well for a drop back passer (Worley). Its meant to open holes in the line to give the QB options if there are no open receivers in his 3-5 second read.
We should be in the hunt and in the mix for SECCG all season. This 8 - 4 ridiculousness is a Stooley hangover. This team should be hardcore this year. The Terminator, Mike DeBord, is going to sort the O-line out. That's all we need.
The only two teams that are a toss-up this year are Bama and Georgia. Georgia picks up both Bama and Barn this year and they will "Georgia" another game.
Get over the Stooley hangover. 8 - 4 is not good enough for Team 119. Our young squad will really come together, and prove more resilient, by the end of the year.
SECCG or bust for Team 119.
Not trying to sound like a smart a$$ but the OL did fine when Dobbs came in. They have run zone blocking scheme ever since Jones has set foot on campus, zone blocking doesn't fair well for a drop back passer (Worley). Its meant to open holes in the line to give the QB options if there are no open receivers in his 3-5 second read.
We should be in the hunt and in the mix for SECCG all season. This 8 - 4 ridiculousness is a Stooley hangover. This team should be hardcore this year. The Terminator, Mike DeBord, is going to sort the O-line out. That's all we need.
The only two teams that are a toss-up this year are Bama and Georgia. Georgia picks up both Bama and Barn this year and they will "Georgia" another game.
Get over the Stooley hangover. 8 - 4 is not good enough for Team 119. Our young squad will really come together, and prove more resilient, by the end of the year.
SECCG or bust for Team 119.
Not yet Eddie
WHY?
What is there to validate this opinion?
In my view, we have the experience and talent in all 3 phases of the game to compete with anyone in our conference.
Compete. That's all you can ever ask for.
With all things being equal or almost equal (ie. competitive)- Why not believe your team can make it to the conference championship?
wut
Pretty sure Mizzou sacked us like 6 times.
Excellent synopsis, and again do feel free to ask anything specific here and we can save you the time of sorting through VN. There is a lot of good information here, you just have to wade through a sea of rumors, negavol posts, and general idiocy.
Side note, you don't need to tell me about Memphis last year. I'm a '13 alum. I was raised on UT football with my dad, and as young as I am have been going to games since the days of Jamal Lewis, Tee Martin, and Manning of course. I did watch a lot of Memphis football though, and that BYU win was one of the best bowl games last year imo.
I know as a fan that's what you hope for but he's taking a step up in competition. Even if the changes are no more than leadership style and playcalling, it is unlikely that there won't be any drop off at all.
It is likely that there will be at least an adjustment period following a guy who was there as long as your last DC.
That's a really tough expectation. You lost by far and away your best playmaker in Murphy. From a fairly anemic O, you lost your top 4 receivers a year after losing your top 3. It is difficult to seeing MU's O getting better while returning only one proven playmaker at a skill position and with the leading WR returning with only 5 catches.
As UT fans learned well in '13, running the ball well without legitimate threats at the WR position in the SEC is a very, very difficult proposition.
What I stated was objective numerical fact. What you stated was subjective speculation and opinion. Neither of us has any idea how injuries will turn out with Tennessee, but either way it doesn't happen in a vacuum. Other teams have injuries and other bad things happen as well....those things are all unknown and the only thing we can really do at this point is talk about where teams stand prior to any of those things happening.....and the fact is, as things stand right now, Tennessee is in as good or better position than any team in the SEC.
Honestly, from my experience... yes. That's a stretch. Give the coaches major credit if they even equal last year's "bad" production. TE mitigates it some but Mizzou's O seems to be pretty dependent on stretching the field vertically and horizontally. Much of that has been heavily dependent on timing and "feel" between the QB and WR's. That's already a challenge with how inconsistent your QB is.... now you have WR's with little to no experience.Is it that big a stretch to assume with 4 returning OL,our starting QB who is mobile and our starting RB that we can't get equal production out of our returning WR? It's not like the bar is sat that high! We have several WR on the roster with more or at least equal physical ability of Sasser,Hunt or White. We also have a nice crop of TE who are athletic ball catchers watch for a increased production from that position.
Chemistry can only be developed so far in practice or 7 on 7. It takes live action against an opponent who does things you do not expect and, frankly, are often more athletic and talented than the DB's they face in practice.Now the QB and his WR just have to develop chemistry,the OL should provide protection and the RB should pose a running threat to allow numbers couple that with Mauk ability to bail us out with his feet and yes I don't see a offensive decline.
PS- Not trying to just be harsh on you but Mizzou's rise has had as much or more to do with UT and UF's simultaneous slump than with Mizzou getting appreciably better. If Mizzou is "just as good" as last year (which you believe they will be but I don't)... then they will probably fall a couple of spots. UT is getting better. Arkansas returns a lot of the pieces that made them better.
On the flip side... and under the "living a charmed existence" column... you appear to be getting MSU after they lost many of the experienced and talented players who made them a better team. While UT seems to be in a pattern of catching West teams at their peak or on the rise, Mizzou seems to be doing just the opposite.