lawgator1
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2005
- Messages
- 70,389
- Likes
- 41,403
So let's not be so general. Are you ready to say there's no way Alton Nolen's religious affiliation may not have played a role in what happened?
First....I've forwarded no religious position here. I'm a Wiccan for all you know.
The difference being, the Holy Text of no other faith specifically calls for beheading non-believers, rape as a means of subjugation, or the conversion, submission, or death of members of any other faith. The Muslims actively pursue a non-compete clause regarding other religions.
You can deal with logic if you wish, though as an attorney you should know fact is much more relevant.
Sure. Just like the Christian guy that killed 69 Scandinavian kids a few years back, and went on and on about right wing Christian ideology and Islamaphobia justifying the murders.
Doesn't mean all Christians are apt to gun down 5 dozen kids. It means he's mentally ill, as is this guy. And that both distort their religious views to justify in their own minds doing something awful.
In each case, the religion is not to blame-- its the excuse of a madman.
Sure. Just like the Christian guy that killed 69 Scandinavian kids a few years back, and went on and on about right wing Christian ideology and Islamaphobia justifying the murders.
Doesn't mean all Christians are apt to gun down 5 dozen kids. It means he's mentally ill, as is this guy. And that both distort their religious views to justify in their own minds doing something awful.
In each case, the religion is not to blame-- its the excuse of a madman.
No it wouldn't. In the end the grief I would feel would be for the loss. No different than if she was shot by a recently fired employee who was angry.
Let the old man tell you something he has learned the hard way over the years. Do not never say what you will or will not do in the future. One never knows what one would do until he has walked in those shoes.
Good, I was just hoping to bring it back more toward the middle. Now what if this guy isn't as clearly coo coo as some other guys of note (like the Scandanavian you cite or, say, Jared Loughner) and his beliefs really are a central player?
It's fair to criticize the "they're all the same" approach and get out in front of something (you actually did some of that in the Loughner shooting if you recall) but don't get overly dismissive either.
Yeah so. Maybe he's nut job too, just wanting to put a bullet in someone.
What if he wasn't LE, just a forklift driver? Didn't have a carry permit. Would you prosecute him or call him a hero?
The end result is still the same. All this freaking out over the type of death is ridiculous. So ridiculous that is about to put thousands more US soldiers in harms way. Of course they'll kill with bombs so it's cool
I've never said LEO's shouldn't be armed. I'm sure you can find an example of a non-agency person who used a gun successfully to defend himself or others. But for every one of those I can cite thousands of examples where guns that were initially purchased for that purpose end up killing or maiming innocents, either accidentally, in a rage, or via theft by a third person.
The end result is still the same. All this freaking out over the type of death is ridiculous. So ridiculous that is about to put thousands more US soldiers in harms way. Of course they'll kill with bombs so it's cool