CountVolcula
Eternal Vol
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2008
- Messages
- 32,429
- Likes
- 19,790
Well...Sport....it doesn't matter what the Tennis player, or swim team member thinks. IF they generate revenue, they should get a portion of it. IF they do not, then they are entitled to nothing.
Same thing goes for all professions or FOR-PROFIT organiztaions/businesses. If your work makes money, you are rewarded. If it doesn't then you aren't. It's called the free market system of capitalism. The swim team is already funded by the football team. Why should they feel entitled to MORE of what the football player generates?
You forgot the part that I used the University's resources, facilities and ongoing research to create said invention while they are paying me to do so.If you were on an academic scholarship and your inventions were making the university, lets say...$50 million during your 3-4yr stay, you'd have a different perspective on it. You're getting $60k on a scholarship that was already available regardless of what your inventions brought. But now, they have hit a gold mine due to your skill, effort and intellect. You don't think it would be fair to ask for a reasonable percentage of those proceeds?
By the way, they are getting paid
$20,000 a year in tuition and books. Not counting room and board
Divide that by 11 games
They are getting $2000 a game
or $500 every 15 minutes
Takes me almost have a year to make that kind of money
They can play for what they have or pay their own way and not play
RU serious? What rock have you been living under? Google Search "ESPN, CBS, contract, SEC".Link?
Kettle, meet Mr. Pot...by the way, he says it's you who are black. Just schooled you on the math...no charge (for tutor fees).Maybe you can get in that class with Patterson.
Maybe you can call Mike Hamilton a liar then, when he himself stated publicly that he gave millions to the rest of the AD on top of what they already give each year, and that the football program basically funds the other programs. Only the Basketball teams were somewhat self-sufficient.That is simply not true. MANY non-athletes donate every year to their colleges. Major funding comes to these colleges through non-athletic donations EVERY year. I would hazard a guess but there are very few "full rides" given out by the University System. EVERY student has equal opportunity to get the academic scholarships. It's called studying in High School. My kids were in the marching band in HS and played 2 sports per year. They both received all the money that you can get from UT for their GRADES. Academic scholarships from the University System are EQUAL OPPORTUNITY, athletic scholarships on the other hand are awarded.
And that is why you would not be asking for the entirety of the revenue...just a reasonable portion thereof.You forgot the part that I used the University's resources, facilities and ongoing research to create said invention while they are paying me to do so.
Look. And establishment that annually generates billions of dollars in revenue IS NOT an amateur institution. The NCAA tries to conveniently hide behind the facade of the "Amateur" label, while operating like a BIG BUSINESS. Conferences and Universities operate as a business. If they were Amateur, then they wouldn't be charging me big money to license T-Shirts or apparel with their logo on it.You can't operate a capitalist system in a university where the student atheletes are not not employees of the school. And don't kid yourself - lawyers will be lining up to file lawsuit after lawsuit claiming the school is discriminating against some student athletes by not paying them what the football team is paid.
Again, back to your point. Some schools will generate millions more than others due to media markets, etc. Coaches will use the players potential "paycheck" as a recruiting tool, and schools like Texas will be able to pay their players alot more than other schools in their conference. It opens the door for an avalanche of problems........you should be able to see that.
And that is why you would not be asking for the entirety of the revenue...just a reasonable portion thereof.
Same with Pro Football. It's no different than the NFL. The owners have LOTS of expenditures to cover as well...but that doesn't mean the players association should just take whatever the NFL and owners are willing to relinquish.
It has holes because....you say so? It's complicated because...? Just as the NFL players have representation (players union), the Football and Basketball players in the NCAA should have their own body of representation.Another hole in your theory. Who determines what a "reasonable portion" of the revenue the athletes deserve? The athletes? What if it's not what they think is enough? I mean, if they're getting paid by the school, don't they have a right to be represented by an agent? So all of a sudden, it really IS like the NFL. This has so many problems associated with it that it makes you dizzy.
The day they start paying the college players is the day I stop watching. No argument out there can change my mind on this. No one is forcing these athletes to attend a major university. If they want to get paid for working let them join the military. Our armed forces can always use strong, healthy young men to defend our freedoms. Fact is that after a couple years in the military they might come to appreciate a university scholarship.
jmho
While I agree that many of these athletes have a self-entitlement that is undeserved in all aspects, but it's just a sticky situation in that they are forced to attend college in order to peruse a career completely unrelated to academics.
Because you say so? What do you have to back up your statements with? Garbage...as we will see.Everything you just stated is absolute garbage.
In your profession, you have a multitude of different businesses to work for, and thus have more leverage to leave an untenable (compensation) arrangement.If what you said were true, then each and every one of us are slaves to our jobs.
On TV revenue alone, UT generates in excess of $18mill/yr. The scholarship costs you mention isn't even 10% of that figure. This doesn't even factor in all the other forms of revenue generated (Ticket sales/Luxury Suites/Merchandise/Licensing/Radio/Donations/Athletic scholarships provided via donations...from guys like Peyton Manning and other alumni.A university brandishing 85 scholarships for only one sport is a lot of money they lose. Multiply 85 scholarships x ~$20,000 per student's tuition = $1,700,000.
Not to mention travel expenses for each and every player, food and nutrition for each and every player, equipment, apparel etc.
You're absolutely ignorant if you think that the Universities aren't well-taken care of...and able to return 10-20% of all revenue back to those who generate it for them.You're absolutely ignorant if you think that football players aren't well-taken care of.
Because you say so? What do you have to back up your statements with? Garbage...as we will see.
In your profession, you have a multitude of different businesses to work for, and thus have more leverage to leave an untenable (compensation) arrangement.
For a skilled football or basketball athlete, they only have one option (NCAA). And their scholarships are no different than one on an academic scholarship. Lots of funds are donated for athletic scholarships. The difference here is that football and basketball athletes usually generate FAR more revenue than is expended. It is merely this disparity that is brought into question. Let's use your own figures as a good example.
On TV revenue alone, UT generates in excess of $18mill/yr. The scholarship costs you mention isn't even 10% of that figure. This doesn't even factor in all the other forms of revenue generated (Ticket sales/Luxury Suites/Merchandise/Licensing/Radio/Donations/Athletic scholarships provided via donations...from guys like Peyton Manning and other alumni.
You're absolutely ignorant if you think that the Universities aren't well-taken care of...and able to return 10-20% of all revenue back to those who generate it for them.
That's how it's done in the real world. Only so many openings at Apple, Intel, Microsoft, Disney, etc.Imagine this:
Dooley: Son, there are lots of great reasons to come to UT, and we really need a player like yourself to come make an impact on our program.
Recruit: Well, coach, I understand what you're saying, and I like UT and all, but........Alabama generated a little more revenue than UT did last year, so their players are getting a higher cut than UTs......and my family really needs the money,so........
Dooley: But, but, y-y-you could play in front of 100,000 screaming fans, and..
Recruit: Coach, I appreciate what you're doin,....really. But it's just a numbers game.....sorry.
Yes, but what about the ones that do you have a chance at the pros?
What does joining the military have to do with this? Please s'plain to us (without all the tobacco afterspray), General, how that is suppose'en to work...you figur's?The day they start paying the college players is the day I stop watching. No argument out there can change my mind on this. No one is forcing these athletes to attend a major university. If they want to get paid for working let them join the military. Our armed forces can always use strong, healthy young men to defend our freedoms. Fact is that after a couple years in the military they might come to appreciate a university scholarship.
jmho