govols/cc
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2008
- Messages
- 20,587
- Likes
- 1,366
It's a double edged sword with all of this to be honest. Can we not agree that the NCAA is basically the only avenue a football player ACTUALLY has to get to the NFL? Something seem backwards in making an excellent athlete maintain a certain level of academic accomplishment but not forcing a student on merit scholarship maintain a certain level of physical fitness in order to maintain their academic scholarship.
And you are a ****ing moron for ignoring the similarities between them. I just spelled it out real simple like for you. They are both firmly entrenched profiteering establishments.
Both leverage heavy penalties to their advantage, in order to maintain their cash cow. On those grounds alone, the comparison can be reasonably made...with or without your permission.
There are some striking parallels between them, so it's a relevant comparison on some level.
It is to the student athlete on a full scholarship.
Exactly. And trying to claim that their scholarships is reasonable compensation is about rational as saying that room and boarding was reasonable compensation for slaves, prior to the end of the Civil War.
Compensation should be relative to the sport and amount of income generated. Sports that don't generate enough income, simply don't benefit from those that do. Most of UT's sports are funded by the Football dept. So, they are already getting a free ride. They should feel no sense of entitlement to receive the same compensation that a football player would. Just like every other profession in the world.
You want the big bucks, then you have to go where the big bucks are and try to break into that profession.
football players produce money above and beyond what they are "paid" for a scholarship. The same is not true for an English major
how many guys have made it to the NFL without their college training? they are there to learn a skill just like any other student. id like to see a guy leave high school get a gold membership , workout for a few years then submit his name for the draft.
Raise the admission requirements across the board, minimum ACT of 24.
Then you have true student athletes going to school to earn a degree and help them out
Let the NFL start a minor league football league for the ones that only go to college to get to the NFL. Dont care anything about learning or getting a degree
Problem solved
RU serious? What rock have you been living under? Google Search "ESPN, CBS, contract, SEC".
Each school in the SEC averaged about $18+mill/yr just from their TV contracts alone. That was before it expanded with TAM and UM. It will get much higher now. Even if the football players were to receive a measely 1% of that, it's $180k divided by 85, that is still about $2k. At 10% (of TV revenue alone...not even including merchandise/licensing and ticket sales), that's roughly $21k/yr. That is not asking a lot and should be VERY doable.
Kettle, meet Mr. Pot...by the way, he says it's you who are black. Just schooled you on the math...no charge (for tutor fees).
Maybe you can call Mike Hamilton a liar then, when he himself stated publicly that he gave millions to the rest of the AD on top of what they already give each year, and that the football program basically funds the other programs. Only the Basketball teams were somewhat self-sufficient.
Want to try again, professor?
Because you say so? What do you have to back up your statements with? Garbage...as we will see.
In your profession, you have a multitude of different businesses to work for, and thus have more leverage to leave an untenable (compensation) arrangement.
For a skilled football or basketball athlete, they only have one option (NCAA). And their scholarships are no different than one on an academic scholarship. Lots of funds are donated for athletic scholarships. The difference here is that football and basketball athletes usually generate FAR more revenue than is expended. It is merely this disparity that is brought into question. Let's use your own figures as a good example.
On TV revenue alone, UT generates in excess of $18mill/yr. The scholarship costs you mention isn't even 10% of that figure. This doesn't even factor in all the other forms of revenue generated (Ticket sales/Luxury Suites/Merchandise/Licensing/Radio/Donations/Athletic scholarships provided via donations...from guys like Peyton Manning and other alumni.
You're absolutely ignorant if you think that the Universities aren't well-taken care of...and able to return 10-20% of all revenue back to those who generate it for them.
Dumbest argument ever, the 18 million Ut gets has nothing to do with the players. It doesnt matter if its Suggs or Manning at qb they are going to get the tv revenue check.
If i remember correctly theres maybe 30 or so Athletic departments who make a profit. What do you do with all the other schools? Cancel the athletic dept and how many kids have you screwed out of getting an education. This is the typical all about me attitude..
Dumbest argument ever, the 18 million Ut gets has nothing to do with the players. It doesnt matter if its Suggs or Manning at qb they are going to get the tv revenue check.
If i remember correctly theres maybe 30 or so Athletic departments who make a profit. What do you do with all the other schools? Cancel the athletic dept and how many kids have you screwed out of getting an education. This is the typical all about me attitude..
I guess I don't have the socialist mindset. I don't see being an athlete at a school the equivalent of slavery. I also don't see where what a school makes in it's program has ANYTHING to do with compensating the players any more than they already are. I work for a company. I agreed to a salary to take the job. My company makes a zillion dollars a year and I knew that when I took the job. Now all the sudden, I am saying wait a minute, you need to pay me more because you are profitable in this division (yet the company as a whole is in the red). Once again, if you know the rules and the compensation when you sign the letter, don't complain about it at a later date. It's not like these kids get to a school and go oh crap, I didn't realize that I was only going to get 40 to 50k per year to be here, I want more! Once again, you won't see the NCAA treating a swimmer any different than a football player. EVER! So given that, where is the money going to come from to pay ALL of the student athletes the SAME amount?
Edit: ALSO, if the baseball team is on TV, do the baseball players get that money? If so, is it only the players that played or only the scholarship players or each player on the team? What happens if every sport at a school runs in the red, do they not get paid? What if a sport is in the red one year and the black the next? Do they get paid one year and not the next? Do you pay the stars on the FB team more than the guys that practice EVERY day but never get to play on game day? That have just as much "invested" in the team as the guy that gets to play.
The knee jerk reaction to this issue is always the same. However, no one seems to give it a whole lot of thought and never weighs the consequences. It's very easy to sit back and cast stones at a problem, it's very hard to come up with real solutions to a problem.
Plenty of great players can easily score that minimum 24
I would rather UT put a student on scholarship that wants a degree first, than one that only has the aspirations to leave as soon as they get a chance